pebblewriter

Tag: inflation

  • Quad-Witching: Sep 21, 2018

    We’re off to a quiet start so far, with futures up a few points in sympathy to rising oil and gas prices — both up over 1% — and, a bounce in the dollar index.

    OPEC is slated to meet over the weekend, and it’s not unusual to see oil rally in advance of a policy meeting.  It’s also not unusual to see the leader of the free world resort to Twitter to express his dissatisfaction with oil prices which are rising largely as the result of his own policies.

    Speaking of which, Walmart is the latest (and largest) retailer to warn of higher prices as the result of Trump’s proposed tariffs.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Devil’s Playground

    Catch this news flash yesterday?  Trump, ironically at a White House meeting with the National Council for the American Worker:

    You’re gonna see on China, today, right after close of business…we’ll be announcing something, uh, and it will be a lot of money coming into the coffers of the United States of America, a lot of money coming in, but you’ll be seeing what we’re doing uh right after close of business today, the markets closing.  Thank you.

    Note the repeated emphasis on the market’s closing. Was there something about the announcement that required a delay?  To paraphrase…the after-hours markets are the devil’s playground.

    The S&P 500 plunged 22 points from Friday’s highs, then recovered just in time for a well-engineered close: down only 16 points on the day.  More importantly, it closed at 2888.80 – just above yesterday’s 10-DMA at 2888.70 (2888.80 today.)

    After the close, of course, the futures tanked – shedding 14 points before being saved by the usual suspects: VIX, WTI and USDJPY.  Trump’s announcement didn’t come right after the close.  In fact, it didn’t come until after 3 1/2 hours had passed.  Why?That’s how long it took to get the safety net properly positioned.  USDJPY, which had just backtested its IH&S neckline, spiked sharply moments after the announcement.

    VIX, which had just backtested the broken white channel, suddenly reversed and headed lower.

    The overnight action was impressive, with the usual timely plunges when ES faced important tests. How much more of a smackdown will resurrect stocks’ rally?Whether the rebound will hold or not is anyone’s guess.  China has already announced retaliation – which Trump insisted will lead to a $267 billion expansion of US tariffs.

    Futures are under pressure again, and interest rates are threatening to break out on the obvious (to everyone except Trump, apparently) inflation threat that tariffs pose.  Might investors care that the trade wars could, as Jack Ma theorized, last for 20 years?

     

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Art of Hat Holding

    One nice thing about patterns is that they give you something to hang your hat on.  When we drew the Inverted Head & Shoulders Pattern on Jul 3 [see: Holiday Headfake] there was nothing in the news to suggest a 100-pt rally in the ensuing week.

    Yet, SPX and ES landed within a point or two or their IH&S targets yesterday all the same.  Likewise, all the news was rosy yesterday — incessant talk of renewed buyout fever and imminent, glowing earnings reports.Yet, completion of the pattern, combined with a channel midline, put a pause on the rally right where expected.  With its SMA200 now a mere 30 points below its 2.24 extension, SPX can backtest any time it likes with plenty of support around 2700.

    In fact, if ES is able to hold the (formerly broken) channel into which it reinserted itself, the damage would be limited to 20-30 points.

    One key: VIX.  So far, it has put the brakes on at a backtest of the recently broken straw-man trend line.  If it can remain below the red TL and the SMA200, and USDJPY keeps ramping, stocks will suffer a mild pullback.  If the coming drops in oil and gas get going, then SPX will do well to hold 2750 and, depending on the PPI/CPI numbers due out today and tomorrow, could test 2700 again.

    If we should dip below the SMA200 and 2.24 extension again, then it’s time to hold on to your hat.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • CPI: The Games Continue

    Everyone who drives knows that gas prices increased more than 3% month-over-month  – the official, seasonally adjusted numbers from the BLS in this morning’s CPI report.  Data put together by non-governmental sources confirms it.But, folks like GasBuddy and AAA aren’t responsible for cost of living adjustments for millions of Americans.  So, unlike the BLS, they have no incentive to fudge the numbers. Maybe they’re also aware that gas stations don’t allow customers to pay the “seasonally-adjusted” price.

    Using the EIA’s (also fudged) numbers, gas prices were up 6.2% for April — more than twice BLS’ goal-seeking 3%.  So, the BLS was able to report 0.2% instead of the 0.3% expected for April CPI.Similar games are played, of course, with respect to shelter (+3.4% YoY,) medical care (+2.2%) and vehicles (-1.6% new, -0.9% used.) I’ll pick on vehicle data this morning, as it illustrates another shortcoming of the BLS approach.

    Consumers buy food and gas every few days, while they tend to hold on to vehicles for several years at a time.  Even if vehicle prices were to drop, that savings wouldn’t flow through to a consumer until they purchase a vehicle.  When they did, of course, they’d be hit with higher interest rates than were in place last month or last year.

    The algos don’t care much about the veracity of the numbers.  Futures are up 8 points ahead of the open — another overnight VIX bashing that has it below the SMA200 and about to test the .886 Fib and channel midline at 13.23ish.  While it’s nice to nail a forecast, it’s distressing to see how easily the algos can be manipulated. The flip side of under-reporting inflation, of course, is the effect it has on currencies and interest rates. With “no” inflation pressure, interest rates have receded from 3% — sapping some of the dollar’s strength. continued for members… (more…)

  • Update on Gold: Apr 11, 2018

    In our last major update [see: Jan 26 Update] we noted that gold, 1355 at the time, had reached the same price level at which it had frequently reversed.  Even though we’d had a bullseye at 1377-1380 for over a year, it had stopped short several times.

    GC is sitting just below the neckline of the huge IH&S that could result in a significant breakout.  The fly in the ointment: I don’t think TPTB will let it break out.  So, you should either take profits here in the 1348-1365 range, or at least set your stops at this level.

    As it happened, 1365 (reached the day before) was the cycle high.  Gold tumbled 4.1%, then bounced around between roughly 1308 and 1362 for the next two months.  Our interim posts caught most of the moves:

      * * *

    Feb 8: Analog Details  “[Gold] has dropped 4.1% since reversing where expected in late Jan, and just reached fanline and double channel support [1321.] Could it finally be ready to tag 1377-1380?”  Bottomed that day, rallied to 1364 over the following week (+2.51%.)

    Feb 15: Where to, Next?  “GC might have run out of steam here [1360.] Cautious types should consider taking profits, while the daredevils out there remain focused on 1380.” Topped out the following day at 1364 (+2.95%.)

    Feb 27: Powell’s French Toast   “Gold is getting clobbered…our analog suggests a Mar 1 turning point. The SMA100 should be around 1303 by then and would be a better bounce spot.”  Bottomed on Mar 1 at 1303.60 (+4.15%.)

    Mar 27: Algos to Markets – All Better  “GC, which tagged its 1362 resistance yet again, has retreated once more… It still has a good shot at 1380, but only if/when DXY finally breaks down.” Reached 1369.40 today (+5.05%.)

     * * *

    So, here we are, sitting on a tidy 14.7% gain.  It’s not terrible for 2 1/2 months work, considering gold has only netted a 0.9% gain during that period.  But, I hate to leave money on the table. Is it time to pull the plug on 1377-1380?  Or, are we about to reach or exceed it?

    continued for members…

    The two major factors at work are the ongoing saga of the US dollar and the possibility of a shooting war with Russia in Syria.  I can’t speak to the question of a war other to say anything’s possible, especially with the crew currently running the ship.

    The dollar is another matter.  While it normally rises and falls in sync with interest rates, this relationship reversed at the end of 2017.    At that point, DXY logged another leg lower while TNX spiked. At just shy of 3%, the TNX became a drag on equities — the whole “going broke” thing [see: Why Rising Rates Are a Problem This Time.]  But, as the gyrations in equities picked up again, great care was taken to ensure it didn’t plunge in value.

    I suppose the thinking was that lower rates would weaken the dollar’s appeal.  Or, maybe it was just fear of a yield curve inversion.  In any case, TNX’s purple TL has refused to break down. DXY also refuses to break down.  And, this could go on for quite a while.  It needs to tag the bottom of the rising purple channel.  But, until mid-July rolls around, that would mean dipping below the .618 at 88.423.  So, it’s quite possible TPTB will prop it up for another three months! 

    Remember, Mnuchin publicly stated he wants to support the USD.  And, it goes without saying that he, like every central banker, loathes any serious price appreciation in gold, as it undermines the value of the mighty dollar. One silver lining, EURUSD suggests a shorter timeframe, say Jun 5.  But, even two months would be a long time to wait for another few points.  An escalation in MENA tensions could obviously accelerate things.  But, is it worth taking the risk for 10-15 points?  I think not.  I’d pull the plug or at least enter stops here at 1367.  If it pops above 1380, great.  No argument with going long, again.  DXY could drop to 87 tomorrow, and GC could easily reach 1377-1380 or higher.

    But, if DXY continues sideways, and unless war breaks out in the next day or two, it seems likely that gold’s next move will be lower.  The most obvious support is at the rising white channel bottom and SMA100, currently around 1315.2-1318.  If the channel breaks down again, the SMA200 will reach the purple channel line later this month, probably around 1300.  I’ll update things if we see a material deviation in either direction.

    GLTA.

     

     

  • Does the Yield Curve Matter? A Closer Look

    I called a top in SPX on May 20, 2015 [see: The Last Big Butterfly] because it was about to reach the 1.618 Fib extension at 2138 — our upside target from way back in 2012.  SPX peaked the following day and fell over 300 points before it was all over.

    What I didn’t notice at the time was the bond market. We’ve focused on this from time to time, most recently on Dec 29 [see: Should You Fear the Yield Curve?]  We noted at the time that while the spread between 10Y and 2Y was dropping rapidly, it only represented a warning unless it bottomed out and rose rapidly.  From that post:

    …the above shows that while the potential is there for a recession, this is just an early warning at this time. If the yield curve bottoms out here and rapidly steepens, we’ll have a lot more to worry about.

    Two sessions later, the spread did bottom out, and has been on a tear ever since.  What does this mean?  Let’s look at how things unfolded in the past.

    The spread had been tightening since Dec 31, 2013.  It bottomed in Feb 2015 and began rising again.  In early May, it broke above a trend line (red, dashed) connecting its highs.

    About the same time that SPX was peaking, it backtested that TL and continued higher.  It broke trend (purple, dashed) around Jul 31, a few days before SPX fell off a cliff.  It broke down to new lows (the red, dotted line) in Jan 2016, about the same time that SPX bottomed out.What the yield curve said, then, in simple terms:

    – a breakout from the downtrend marked an equity top (bearish)
    – a breakdown of the subsequent uptrend was really bearish
    – a break to new lows represented a potential bottom (bullish)

    Before I go any further, I want to point out that there were four significant bottoms in 2015-2016.  The first two came close to backtesting the 1.272 Fib at 1823, but didn’t quite make it.  The second two did.Now, let’s look at the same period, but comparing the 10Y (TNX) itself to SPX.  Note that SPX peaked shortly after TNX reached the falling red TL, and began having trouble once TNX broke out.

    SPX fell off its cliff when TNX fell back through the rising purple TL, making bottoms each time TNX did. On Jan 20, 2016, TNX tested its Aug and Sep lows, at which point SPX bottomed at 1812.  A week later, TNX plunged below the previous bottoms and didn’t bounce until it reached the Jan 2015 lows (dashed, purple line.)

    The message delivered by TNX was slightly different from the 10Y2Y:

    – rising up to tag the falling trend line represents a bearish turning point
    – breaking out above it is okay, as long as the uptrend continues
    – a breakdown of the subsequent rebound is really bearish
    – stocks won’t bottom until TNX does

    If we look at the chart below, we can see that the 10Y tracked the 10Y2Y quite closely until it diverged in late 2015 in a failed effort to support stock prices.  It didn’t provide decisive support until it bottomed in Feb 2016 at its Feb 2015 lows.  For a few brief days, the divergence disappeared.Why is this even remotely interesting, you might ask?

    As in 2015, we have also experienced a huge divergence between the 10Y2Y and the 10Y itself.  This is noteworthy in and of itself.But, the comparison gets even more interesting.   As in 2015, we have had an extended slump (14 months vs 17 in 2015), a breakout above the falling red trend line, and a backtest of the trend line.The big differences, so far, are that the spread hasn’t gone on to new highs and that the (presumed) low came as spreads were peaking and only two weeks (versus 8 months) following the peak.

    But, so far, the lessons from 2015 are holding.  The breakout above the falling red TL definitely produced a drop in stocks.  The backtest of the red TL has occurred, but it hasn’t quite reached the purple TL.  As long as it continues bouncing and doesn’t drop back through that TL, stocks should be able to continue rising.  The day it drops back through it, things could get nasty.

    Next, let’s look at the current TNX chart.  We could look at the drop since the Mar 2017 highs, but it was rather short-lived and the subsequent rebound has resembled a moon shot.  Instead, let’s look at the big picture.

    A trend line from the 2008 highs connected with the 2010, 2011 and 2017 highs.  After reversing at each, TNX was accompanied by a large drop in stocks.  TNX’s reversal from its 2013 highs never produced a stock selloff; but, then again, it didn’t quite reach the TL.

    Zooming in a little, we can see that TNX reached this trend line a couple of times in 2017: first, in March, when its reversal accompanied by a mild 78-pt drop in SPX, and again on Dec 20 in a reversal which never gathered any steam.  TNX was back to and punched through the TL on Jan 8.  It reached another TL (gray) drawn through other recent highs on Jan 22 at 26.65.  This was a potential top, meaning the bond folks breathed a sigh of relief.

    On Jan 26, however, it popped up through the gray trend line.  Not so coincidentally, that was the day that SPX peaked.Remember our lessons from TNX in 2015:

    1. reversing off the falling trend line represents a bearish turning point – it didn’t reverse

    2. breaking out above it is okay, as long as the uptrend continues – it did, but as it approached 3%, folks started getting nervous.

    3. a breakdown of the subsequent rebound is really bearish – we got a potential reversal at 29.43, but it has a long ways to go before reaching the rebound trend line, currently at 24.40.

    Interestingly, that TL intersects the falling red TL at about 24.60 on Mar 13, the day that CPI for February is reported.

    And this is where it gets interesting.  If TNX continues to rally, bond folks and equity folks will get nervous (the fiscal fiasco.)

    If it were to fall to the rising purple trend line and backtest the red trend line at 24.60, it might be somewhat bearish unless: (a) it reflects a big drop in inflation (in keeping with my oil and gas forecast) and (b) it rebounds there.

    If it fell below 24.60, the TNX lessons suggest that SPX would be in big trouble.  With a Fed meeting a week later, we can assume Powell et al would be focused on preventing that from happening.  But, as our analog suggests, this preceeds an important inflection point by just a few weeks.

    If TNX falls through 24.60, remember lesson 4…

    4.  stocks won’t bottom until TNX does

     *  *  *

    Now, onto our analog update. In our initial post and follow up from Feb 6-7 [see: Analog Watch], we anticipated SPX would rebound from 2533 (our downside target) to 2765 by Feb 14 and 2812 by Feb 23.  Instead, it bounced from 2532.69 to 2742 on Feb 16 and to 2789 — 23 points short and 4 days late — by Feb 27.

    An adjustment was clearly necessary, given that SPX and ES bottomed on different days.  We’ll try to reconcile the two, along with some economic forecasts which are definitely outside the norm.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • US Dollar: Capitulation?

    When it comes to trade, there is no free lunch.  A lower US dollar helps US exporters.  But, for the US – a net importer by a huge margin – it raises the price of imports.

    So, it was really interesting to watch Treasury Secretary Mnuchin step in it explain that a lower USD would be “beneficial to our trade imbalances” without mentioning the offsetting, and more troubling, inflation and interest rate repercussions.

    If we didn’t have $21 trillion in debt (multiples of that off-book) in a rising interest rate environment, it probably wouldn’t matter.  But, the CBO’s numbers, which assume 10-yr rates top out just over 3% (half the historical average), argue otherwise.

    Mind you, I’m not complaining.  I’ve been bearish on the USD for a very long time.  In May 2017 [see: May 1 Update on US Dollar] we noted that DXY had broken below a long-term trend line and was susceptible to more downside.

    …if DXY drops through the SMA200 and the yellow TL, then we have some very obvious Fib targets including the .786 at 97.583, the .886 at 96.789 and the purple .618 where it intersects the purple channel midline at 96.465 in July or August.  If the purple midline breaks down, the next major support isn’t until 91 in early September and 87-88 as early as the end of the year.

    We’ve seen plenty of worrisome bumps along the way, with a couple of timely rallies in Q4 to support stocks.  But, our charts have remained bearish even as the Fed, with its ineffectual rate hikes, struggled to argue otherwise [see: Will the FOMC Minutes Save the Dollar?]

    DXY just tagged our 87-88 target, reaching 88.438 moments ago with its eye on the rising purple channel bottom around 87.423.As we discussed in yesterday’s updates on EURUSD and USDJPY, the big question is what now?  The charts offer a compelling answer.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Gold: Following the Yellow Brick Road

    I’m not a gold bug.  I’ve always thought the price is pretty heavily manipulated (long before it hit the headlines) and I guess I’ve avoided it on principle.  Looking back at my forecasts over the past year or so, that was probably a mistake.

    Since our December 14, 2015 forecast, GC has gained about 19% — not shabby.  However, if one heeded the forecasts offered with each subsequent update, the net return would have been over 80%.

    I’ve said many times, lately, that forecasting stocks has become a lot tougher than forecasting the various drivers of stock prices.  In the case of gold, it is obviously affected by the value of the US dollar, which is an important component of USDJPY — a key driver of equity algos.

    Thus, GC — like USDJPY, WTI and VIX — is one of those things that’s been relatively easy to forecast even though I’ve devoted only the occasional hour or two to its study.  Before we touch on today’s forecast, let’s take a look at the past year’s periodic forecasts.The numbers in the above chart correspond to the posts below.

    1. Dec 14, 2015 (GC: 1060):
      “If DX plunges further, as I expect it will, GC’s 4th bounce could be a doozy: 1150-1180 for starters, and 1286 after that.”  GC reached 1180 by Feb 8, topped out at 1287.80 on Mar 11.
    2. Mar 4, 2016 (GC: 1280):
      “I’d be very cautious in chasing GC at this point…acts like it’s reversing between here and 1286…take the gains…it could easily backtest the .618 at 1207.60.”  GC reached 1286 the next week, then reversed to backtest 1206.
    3. April 8, 2016 (GC: 1240):
      “If [gold] breaks above the purple midline [at 1270] then 1379-1380 is the next logical target…”   Gold reached 1377.50 three months later.
    4. July 7, 2016 (GC: 1361):
      “Our target range from April 8 was 1379-1380.  Yesterday’s 1377.50 was probably close enough.  If it can’t make new highs today, the next stop is the neckline at 1307..”  GC, which peaked at 1377.50 on Jul 6, dropped 5% to 1310 over the next 2 weeks.
    5. Aug 26, 2016 (GC: 1324):
      “…[there’s a] huge IH&S Pattern, the neckline of which is the former high at 1307ish.  If TPTB are serious about discrediting GC anytime soon it’ll involve getting it back below that [1307] support.”  GC tumbled to 1307, testing it three times before breaking down to 1243 on Oct 7.
    6. Oct 7, 2016 (GC: 1254): “…GC tagged its SMA200 and the bottom of a pretty good looking channel earlier — usually good for a bounce.”  GC bottomed the next day at 1243, bounced for a month, reached 1339 on Nov 9.
    7. Nov 14, 2016 (GC: 1227): …GC’s channel finally broke down two days ago and has potential to 1083 — a 12% drop from here.  What better way to finish the year out?  GC plunged 103 (8.4%) over the next month.
    8. Dec 5, 2016 (GC: 1175): If the .618 [1172.40] breaks down, then the next support isn’t until the red TL at 1130, followed by the .886 at 1083.50… GC reached 1130 on Dec 15.
    9. Dec 15, 2016 (GC: 1129): “GC is currently testing an important internal TL of support… a potentially important test…that could produce a bounce to the purple midline [at 1230] or the SMA200 — currently at 1278.”  GC reached the SMA200 at 1264.60 on Feb 27.

    After tagging its 200-day average in February, gold tumbled about 67, back below a key channel midline.  But, it is right back in the swing of things, having nearly reached the SMA200 a second time just yesterday.

    With all the discussion about what the Fed will or won’t do for the rest of the year, what’s next?

    continued for members… (more…)