Tag: inflation

  • PPI’s Big Beat

    PPI was expected to tick 0.3% (0.1% core) higher in July. Instead, headline PPI soared 0.6% and core popped a stunning 0.5% – the highest since October 2018.

    The impact on stocks has been muted so far, as the market is still giddy over the potential release of what is essentially a Phase 1 vaccine out of Russia. The impact on bonds, however, has been significant. 10Y yields have broken out of a long, slow decline.

    When you’re piling on debt (with record-setting duration) the way the US is, higher interest rates are not good news.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Frontrunning the Fed

    Ultra low interest rates don’t do much for traditional banking earnings, but they’re pretty fantastic for highly leveraged banks such as Goldman that are only too happy to front run the tsunami of Fed liquidity injections.

    Between GS and more positive vaccine news (Moderna) the futures have pushed to higher highs, settling the question as to which of the deep retracements is the ultimate upside target.  Note that the yellow channel midline served as a springboard yet again… …as did VIX’s daily drop to/through trend line support.continued for members(more…)

  • PPI Disappoints

    The producer price index missed this morning, coming in at -0.2% versus consensus and prior read of +0.4%. Core also missed at -0.3% versus consensus of +0.1%. Although the market has certainly staged a V-shaped recovery, someone forgot to check with the economy.

    Not to worry, because Gilead was quickly out with a press release reiterating the virtues of Remdesivir. The algos like this kind of stuff, especially when faced with otherwise depressing headlines.

    More importantly, VIX took a well-timed dive to just below its 10-DMA. The algos love this kind of stuff, and suddenly futures are back in the green.

    Don’t get too excited. It won’t last.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Inflation Craters

    Headline CPI fell 0.8% MoM – the biggest drop since 2008…

    …thanks primarily to plunging energy prices.

    Core CPI fell 0.4% MoM, the biggest drop since it began being tracked in 1961.

    The details show strong upticks in food and medical care but weakness almost everywhere else.Like almost all economic data lately, the algos have chosen to ignore inflation, as VIX dropped another 7.7% from its overnight highs. For the moment, nothing else seems to matter much.

    VIX has fallen from 47.77 to 26.37, a 45% decline, since ES backtested its 2.24 Fib extension on April 21. SPX has climbed a total of 8% during that time – with the great majority of its gains on overnight ramp jobs driven by plunges in VIX.

    Today, the algos are also watching the bond market quite closely, as the Fed is slated to dip its toe into corporate bonds – including junk bonds – for the first time.What could go wrong?

    continued for members(more…)

  • Crude Carnage

    May WTI futures are off almost 35% since Friday’s close.  This drops it below the 17.12 target we first identified in March 2019 when, at 59.32, CL had completed a rising wedge and tagged multiple channel lines.

    Members might recall the 17.12 target was originally set for April 2023 in keeping with a March 2019 cycle study [see: Macro Factor Cycles and Regime Shifts.] The chart patterns and Fib levels fit nicely with the concept of a recurring 2600-day cycle for significant lows.We’ve reiterated the 17.12 target many times, including last December as CL finished on a high note after plunging 45% in the wake of Jamal Khashoggi’s Oct 2018 murder (when the US achieved maximum leverage over the Saudis – see: Coincidences and Consequences.) The last significant bounce accommodated both the Aramco IPO and the year-end equity ramp.

    Oil has been a favorite tool of not only the Saudis but also central bankers and politicians.  In fact, understanding the relationship between oil/gas and inflation, interest rates and equity valuations has made it possible to accurately forecast most of its major moves over the years.

    At times, this has meant ignoring the frequently misleading supply/demand data, OPEC deliberations, and presidential tweets and focusing instead on where central bankers needed oil/gas to go in order to achieve a particular inflation and interest rate goals.

    As interest rates rose over the past few years, for instance, it became obvious that inflation would need to moderate to relieve the building budgetary pressure.

    One major theme on which we’ve focused since calling the top on interest rates in October 2018 [see: Suddenly Interest Rates Matter] has been the relationship between CPI and the YoY delta in gas prices. By “managing” the price of RBOB, CPI and, thus, interest rates could be managed higher or lower as needed.This was a very reliable theme for most of 2018, 2019, and early 2020 – when the focus shifted to oil’s strong correlation to stock prices.

    Oil has long been a major factor in triggering algos to bid up stocks. So, when oil’s major channel from 2016 broke down in February, we knew stocks were in deep trouble.

    With CL dropping through its 2001 lows and approaching its 1998 lows, what might we expect from oil and what are the implications for stocks? As we discussed last week:

    A drop through 19.27 would be reason enough to revert to short with 17.12 and 10.65 the only support between here and zero.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Update on Gold: Apr 8, 2020

    In our last formal update on gold in January [see: Jan 2 Update on Gold] with GC trading at 1529, I noted that although DXY had held up well, gold should benefit from loose Fed policy – but could see a backtest of its SMA200 based on the oil/gas meltdown we expected.

    I am partial, though, to the Fed putting the damper on inflation in January (reported in Feb) and setting up a backtest of the SMA200 or even the neckline which would set up another leg up to 1710-1735 in Oct 2021 or Jan 2022. Note that this would tie in nicely with the idea of an oil/gas meltdown in 2023.

    We certainly got all those things, but the timing was just a tad off.

    Long time members will remember I’ve been writing about gold’s potential Inverted Head & Shoulders Pattern for years. This post from September 2017 comes to mind.

    As I stated in that last update, I think TPTB will do whatever it takes to keep that giant IH&S targeting 1721 from playing out. The only thing I can see outweighing their efforts would be a true black swan event such as open warfare on the Korean Peninsula.

    Sure enough, every time GC got close to that neckline (the dashed yellow line above), it was smacked down by as much as 18%. It has happened 9 times since July 2016.  It was nice for trading purposes, but frustrating to the many gold bugs out there.

    While rising oil and gas prices were helpful to Aramco’s share offering in 2019, they disrupted the delicate balance between inflation and interest rates and sent a clear signal that it was finally time for GC to break out — which it finally did last June.

    Since then, it’s been a matter of waiting for the rising price channel to reach our upside targets. It might have been a long wait if not for the coronavirus. We managed to avoid war with North Korea, but this smaller, deadlier enemy was plenty Black Swan enough for the Fed.

    A few trillion in QE later, GC has reached our 1735 target — well ahead of schedule and after a very dramatic SMA200 backtest.

    Is the run over, or is there more to come?

    continued for members(more…)

  • Update on Oil: Apr 6, 2020

    Many seasoned investors are surprised to see how positively correlated stock returns have been to oil prices. Energy stocks make up 8% of the overall market, so you’d expect them to have some influence. But, thanks to the increasing prominence of algorithms and quantitative trading, the impact has grown well beyond what 8% should contribute – with most of the market’s significant highs and lows perfectly aligned with oil’s over the years.A 2017 study by JP Morgan estimated that only 10% of trading volume is by discretionary investors who focus on fundamentals. This means that 90% of all volume is driven by passive and quantitative techniques including everything from index funds and ETFs to high-frequency trading and corporate buybacks.

    The tail that wags the quantitative dog is algorithmic trading, where hundreds or even thousands of factors are constantly monitored and provide instant input for trading decisions.  While these factors include big picture economic data such as interest rates, inflation or employment figures, the Big Three that consistently drive big moves on a daily basis are VIX, the USDJPY and the price of oil – specifically WTI futures [CL.]

    Oil is the only one of the Big Three which has an almost immediate and substantial impact on the US economy. So, when prices are manipulated higher or lower, we see a change in inflation data, interest rates and, of course, stock prices.

    This is why we were able to call the top on October 3, 2018:

    CL and RB…not only reached overhead resistance by our measure, but must deal with inflation that’s too high, bearish API data, another round of Trump tweeting, and a large build in EIA inventory. I think the time has finally come to revert to short…

    CPI had recently reached almost 3%, dragging interest rates higher as well. The 10-YR reached 3.25% on Oct 5, threatening to break out of a channel dating back over 20 years at a time when debt was exploding higher.

    Trump had been jawboning and tweeting his desire for lower oil prices. But, his entreaties had fallen on deaf ears until Oct 3, when journalist Jamal Khashoggi was brutally murdered and dismembered by agents of Saudi Arabia for criticizing Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (MBS.)

    As details emerged and MBS’ complicity became evident, Saudi Arabia suddenly needed friends in high places. Trump was happy to oblige, but had one condition: oil prices needed to decline immediately – which they did.  CL plunged 45%  over the next 11 weeks.The YoY drop in oil and gas prices was immediately reflected in inflation. CPI dropped from 2.52% in October to 2.18% in November and a low of 1.52% by February 2019.

    The 10-YR dropped from 3.25% in October 2018 to 2.36% by March 2019.  Prices at the pump plunged as well, and Americans rejoiced at more affordable commuting costs.

    Remember, oil is one of the Big Three drivers of stock prices. So stocks plunged as well – shedding about 20% by December, when Treasury Secretary Mnuchin convened the Plunge Protection Team to prop up the market – enabling stocks to reach new highs while CL merely enjoyed an extended bounce.Saudi Arabia needed the bounce every bit as much as did stocks. The troubled Aramco share offering had been delayed time and again, and higher oil prices made a larger raise possible. The plunge resumed within a few weeks of the IPO.Then came the slowdown.  Demand had already been ebbing and prices had been settling lower for weeks. But, after a very brief bounce, oil prices plunged when COVID-19 came onto the scene. Suddenly, fundamentals mattered again.

    Prices plunged to the bottom of a falling channel from 2008 over 3 years ahead of schedule per the cycle study we first posted in March 2019 [see: Macro Cycles and Regime Shifts.]This added fuel to the fire for stocks, which already had plenty of reason to plunge as global economic activity screeched to a halt.  Algos, which might normally have been employed to prop up stocks, were pressuring them lower.  At the same time, the USDJPY was falling as the Japanese yen rallied and VIX spiked higher on greatly increased volatility.

    Note that long-term trends in gasoline prices were also in danger of breaking down.

    Perhaps more alarming to Team Trump, the Dow had fallen to levels not seen since the 2016 election. The energy industry is vitally important to the US, with millions of jobs and billions in loans dependent on prices stabilizing. It’s no surprise that the federal government would support it as it has many other industries which have been decimated by the global pandemic. Many majors oppose price supports, perhaps hoping to scoop up highly-leveraged players at a bargain price when they failed.

    However, instead of making low or no-interest loans available to tide the industry over as it has with every other affected industry, Trump has focused on artificially inflating prices — first with a series of Tweets and lately with a threat to impose tariffs on imported oil.

    As a result, oil has spiked over 50% higher in a mere 4 sessions…

    …facilitating a 24% bounce in the Dow.

    While some are thrilled with the outcome, there are winners and losers. The biggest losers are those who can least afford it: consumers. Higher oil and gas prices are a regressive tax on those consumers who must still drive (disproportionately those less affluent) or buy heating oil or natural gas to keep their families warm during the waning days of cold weather.

    It’s important to recognize that Trump’s insistence on higher oil prices might be partly about saving oil industry jobs, but it’s really about saving the stock market which has learned to take its cues from oil prices.

    If Trump’s “friend” Mohammad Bin Salman — a “man of the people” — still owes any chits from 2018, oil prices could be well supported going forward. But, of course, it will require the assistance of Trump’s other friend, Vladimir Putin, whose willingness to cut back production involves slightly different priorities.

    With COVID-19 deaths in the US topping 10,000, Putin’s response will be important in crafting the next headline-stealing development. But, most studies I’ve seen indicate that supply now exceeds demand by at least 25 million bpd. So, even the 10-15 million cut suggested by Trump would do nothing to erase the massive oversupply but would merely slow the rate at which the excess is building.

    Rumor has it that Russia will play ball as long as every other oil producing nation is willing to share the pain – including US shale producers, many of were already on life support before COVID-19 (and expect a decent return on their political donations.)

    If I sell you 100 barrels at $30 instead of 200 at $15, have I made any more money?  Will I now be able to pay back that overdue loan?  Will the market reward my stock? Unfortunately, it only works if the pain is borne by the other guys — which will likely boil down to good, old-fashioned horse trading.  Trump’s opening ante is throwing down-and-out Americans under the bus. We’ll see if it’s enough.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Burning Down the House

    Once upon a time, a few boys whose families owned the biggest lemon groves in town got together and opened up a lemonade stand. It was a very hot summer, so they sold an enormous amount of ice-cold lemonade. Since they controlled the supply of lemons, they were able to quickly raise prices from 10 cents per glass to as much as $1.50. Their customers didn’t mind as they could afford 1.50, it was excellent lemonade, and there were no alternatives. They like it so much, in fact, they invested $2 trillion in shares of the stand.

    One day a freak storm hit town, and the temperature dropped from 95 to 25 degrees in a matter of hours. The weatherman said it could last for months. Not many people were interested in ice-cold lemonade, even though the boys frantically dropped their prices. They even tried cutting back on the amount of lemonade they made. For some reason, this had no effect on sales, and prices continued to drop. A few boys split away from the group and tried selling cheaper lemonade on their own, but this further depressed prices. Soon, the lemonade stand went out of business. The end.

    And that, boys and girls, is how OPEC came to be in their current predicament.

    continued for members(more…)

  • More Where That Came From

    We’ve been bearish on oil for quite a while, shorting it at 75.57 on October 3, 2018 after Jamal Khashoggi was dismembered and at each of the 3 subsequent peaks since then: just before the JCPOA breakup, the Abqaiq attack and the Aramco IPO — which should have been a peak, but resulted in a headfake “breakout” climaxing in the Al Asad attack.

    Last night, CL dipped to within 0.41 and RB within 0.187 of our next downside targets. As members know, these are critical support levels. A breakdown would be devastating to oil and gas and present stocks with very strong headwinds.Futures, now at 3260, are headed straight for our next downside target at 3200.Yes, the coronavirus is potentially a very big deal. But, this decline in oil and gas was baked into the markets over a year ago and is a strong endorsement for our inflation model.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Oil Spikes on Iran War Worries

    WTI futures spiked nearly 5% overnight in the wake of a US drone strike on Baghdad Airport which killed Iranian military commander Qasem Soleimani.  It is a dangerous escalation in the US conflict with Iran which broadened when Trump alarmed US allies by pulling out of the Iran nuclear deal last May.

    We argued at the time, as did many, that Trump’s actions put the US on the path to a potential shooting war. The assassination of Soleimani clearly amplifies the risks. So far, oil prices have pushed only slightly above the levels reached after the nuclear deal pullout and the Saudi Aramco plant was attacked in September.  But, this is obviously a more serious geopolitical development. From an economic standpoint, a sharp rise in the price of oil further complicates the already thorny inflation problem facing markets – setting up a showdown between Fed hawks and doves in January.

    continued for members(more…)