pebblewriter

Tag: DX

  • The Market’s Latest “Lucky” Bounce

    That’s a relief!  For months, pundits have been arguing whether the Fed needed to hike interest rates three times or four times this year — you know, because of all the growth coming down the pike.

    Fed Über-Dove and “Man Who Thinks Market Integrity is Overrated” Jim Bullard just announced that the correct number is zero.  That’s right.  Everything is perfect just like it is.

    Amazingly, and quite by coincidence, this pronouncement occurred on the exact same day that several stock market indices were in danger of falling below a very important technical level of support: their 200-day moving averages.  As we discussed on Monday, falling below the SMA200 isn’t usually very healthy for markets.

    For visitors and new members, this seems like a good time to take a walk down memory lane.  This isn’t Mr Bullard’s first rodeo.  Nor is it the first time “someone” did something clever to ensure the market’s continued ascent.

    The S&P 500 illustrates the phenomenon quite well, having experienced a number of such fortunate events at crucial times. October 2014 – Bullard!

    Bullard appeared on Bloomberg to explain that another round of QE might be in order. As “luck” would have it, this enabled SPX to reverse right as it reached important Fibonacci support, ending a 9.9% tumble and narrowly averting an official correction.

    Big assist from USDJPY, which soared 16% over the next 7 weeks in spite of the fact that more QE should have weakened the US dollar.  The Yen Carry Trade in all its glory.

    August 2015 – USDJPY!

    This 12.5% correction was set up by USDJPY falling back below a critical Fibonacci level (the .618 at 120.11) in the wake of SPX reaching a key Fibonacci extension (the 1.618 at 2138.)

    We had correctly forecast the top [see: The Last Big Butterfly] but it was unclear whether or not USDJPY could remain above 120.  SPX plummeted when 120 finally fell but, as “luck” would have it, was (temporarily) rescued by USDJPY’s bounce back above it.

    February 2016 – Oil!

    The price of West Texas Intermediate Oil (CL) had fallen 77% between Aug 2013 and Feb 2016.  While this crushed inflation to a manageable level, it made investors in and lenders to energy-related companies pretty nervous.

    As “luck” would have it, CL bottomed out on Feb 11, 2016 — the exact same day that SPX reached that critical Fibonacci support level of 1823.  CL doubled over the next four months, and SPX rebounded sharply.  By accurately forecast the bottom in oil, we could confidently call a bottom for SPX [see: USDJPY Finally Relents.]June 2016 – USDJPY!

    Stocks plunged in the wake of the Brexit vote.  As “luck” would have it, USDJPY — which had used CL’s rally as an opportunity to reset — picked this particular day to bottom out and spiked 8% higher over the following month.

    Futures had sold off by 6.5%, but by the time SPX opened the next morning the recovery was well underway.  It was soon back above its recent highs and the critical 1.618 extension at 1.618.  In other words: new all-time highs.

    November 2016 – Trump*!  Unfortunately for stocks, the US election results weren’t conducive to a rally.  Once Trump’s election became apparent, futures plummeted over 5% in a matter of hours.  SPX had bounced off its SMA200 a few days earlier.  Unless something was done quickly, it would drop through this key support the following morning.As “luck” would have it, USDJPY picked this particular day to bottom out.  It spiked 5% over the next few hours and 18% over the next few weeks — a supersized version of the exercise which had saved stocks post-Brexit.

    And, if that weren’t enough, VIX — the widely accepted indicator of fear and volatility — plummeted even as futures were plunging.  It’s the equivalent of calling your insurance broker to cancel your homeowner’s policy as a hurricane bears down on your beach house.  How very, very “lucky” indeed.Futures recovered almost all of their losses by the time the cash market opened the following morning. VIX went on to shed over 50% of its value and broke down through trend line support (above, the white arrow.)

    Stocks were soon registered new all-time highs. The talking heads called it the “Trump Rally” and attributed the gains to the incoming president’s pro-business orientation and deal-making acumen. But, I think it deserves an asterisk…on account of the incredible “luck” involved [see: Why the Trump Rally is a Fraud.]

    The SPX chart isn’t labeled as such, but the rise from 2138 to 2703 (the next major Fib level) wouldn’t have been possible without continued support from oil and VIX.  After doubling in value, CL proceeded to construct a well-formed rising channel (below, in purple) that was very supportive of stocks.  It oscillated between the channel’s top and bottom like clockwork — until December 2017.  We’ll come back to that.Also during that time, VIX was trying something new.  After years of occasionally bouncing off the bottom of a long-term channel (below, the yellow arrows) it decided to plunge below that channel bottom and spend 80% of its subsequent days in the cellar — reaching new all-time lows in the process.This sent a strong all-clear signal to stocks (or, at least the algos that trigger stock purchases) that the coast was clear. It was completely safe to buy stocks, which they did — producing a rally that accelerated all the way up to the 2.24 extension at 2703.

    December 2017 – Oil!

    At that point, oil’s breakout (remember the purple channel above?) and the onslaught of new, daily lows in VIX combined to give SPX the boost it needed to climb above that resistance.  I mean, how “lucky” can you get?  It popped above 2703 and tacked on another 6.3% for good measure.

    Unfortunately for stocks, though, there was a practical limit to how high CL could go without creating problems.  Someone had forgotten that higher oil prices mean higher inflation.  And, higher inflation means higher interest rates.  And, when you’re $21 trillion in debt and pass a tax bill and budget that greatly widen the deficit considerably…higher interest rates are not exactly lucky [see: Why Higher Interest Rates Are a Problem This Time.]

    Between that realization and a growing disconnect between price and supply & demand, CL had to drop.  When it did, and the (dashed, red) trend line from August 2017 finally broke down, stocks didn’t take it well.SPX plunged almost 12% over the next two weeks, one of the sharpest corrections ever.  Luckily, the SMA200 was there to catch it.  A few days later, CL popped back above its channel top and SPX recovered to back above 2703.

    As the bounce began to fade, we had a surprise message from Bullard that “too many rate hikes could slow the economy.”  It was enough to extend SPX’s bounce for another few weeks.  But, ultimately it slipped back down below 2703 to tag its SMA200 again.  And, again.  And, again.  And, again.

    By then, DJIA and RUT had finally risen to the point where they could tag their SMA200s as well.  SPX bounced at our 2561 target.  Investors were in luck!  Until this morning.

    April 2018 – Bullard!

    Apparently, someone forgot to explain to the Chinese that we were supposed to win the trade war (winning them is easy!)  This morning, we found out that China had the gall to fight back.  When I was woken by an price alert at 3:15 this morning, the futures were off 55 points.  SPX would open back below its SMA200.

    But, the futures didn’t know what they were up against!

    Then came Larry Kudlow, the guy who in May 2008 called the impending Great Financial Crisis a “non-recession recession.”  Some people might have misunderstood; but, obviously he meant it would be much worse than a recession.  (I can’t wait to find the pot of gold!)

    As “luck” would have it, the market was quite pleased with all this positive scuttlebutt.   ES, once down 55 points, closed up 34 points.  SPX and the Dow rose about 1%.  RUT added 1.30%.  And, COMP — which never did tag its SMA200 — popped 1.45%.  Take that, 200-day moving average!

    Bounces are nice, whether driven by oil, the USDJPY or Fed cheerleaders.  This one got SPX back above its SMA200, which is a good start.  Next comes the 2.24 Fib, which SPX has crossed some twenty times in the past two months.  Can it rise back above and stay there this time?

    Oil’s limitations haven’t disappeared.  Managing inflation and interest rate expectations will continue to dominate its price action.  Lately, the market has a very narrow range within which it feels comfortable.

    USJDPY is threatening to break out from a falling flag pattern, but one has to wonder why it hasn’t done so already.  Japan got no love from Trump in the trade war chatter to date.  It’s quite possible they’re done cooperating with currency intervention. VIX, after popping back above the yellow channel bottom in dramatic fashion in February, has fallen back to a trend line (red, dashed) from its January lows.  Every time it pops above the trend line, SPX stumbles.  Every time it drops below it, SPX rips.  Today, it tagged it and reversed lower – hence the day’s gains.  It has plenty of additional downside potential, with the potential to drive stocks back above 2700.  But, again, it hasn’t done so yet.

    It makes one wonder whether SPX will be allowed to put in a lower low in order to make the corrective wave look a little more conventional and give COMP a shot at its SMA200.  We have oodles and oodles of downside targets if SPX’s SMA200 should fail.  That white dot at 2138 in the chart above is there for a reason [see: More Where That Came From.]

    There are countless other factors I haven’t even mentioned: our yield curve model (which tentatively turned bullish today), 10yr note rates, the US dollar’s buoyancy, various momentum indicators, and the continuing sagas of FB, TSLA, AMZN and DB — all of which have played a role in the market’s gyrations (mostly of the bad luck variety.)

    Whatever happens, it’s hard to imagine we could reach new highs without plenty more luck.  Trade safe, and stay tuned.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Does the Yield Curve Matter? A Closer Look

    I called a top in SPX on May 20, 2015 [see: The Last Big Butterfly] because it was about to reach the 1.618 Fib extension at 2138 — our upside target from way back in 2012.  SPX peaked the following day and fell over 300 points before it was all over.

    What I didn’t notice at the time was the bond market. We’ve focused on this from time to time, most recently on Dec 29 [see: Should You Fear the Yield Curve?]  We noted at the time that while the spread between 10Y and 2Y was dropping rapidly, it only represented a warning unless it bottomed out and rose rapidly.  From that post:

    …the above shows that while the potential is there for a recession, this is just an early warning at this time. If the yield curve bottoms out here and rapidly steepens, we’ll have a lot more to worry about.

    Two sessions later, the spread did bottom out, and has been on a tear ever since.  What does this mean?  Let’s look at how things unfolded in the past.

    The spread had been tightening since Dec 31, 2013.  It bottomed in Feb 2015 and began rising again.  In early May, it broke above a trend line (red, dashed) connecting its highs.

    About the same time that SPX was peaking, it backtested that TL and continued higher.  It broke trend (purple, dashed) around Jul 31, a few days before SPX fell off a cliff.  It broke down to new lows (the red, dotted line) in Jan 2016, about the same time that SPX bottomed out.What the yield curve said, then, in simple terms:

    – a breakout from the downtrend marked an equity top (bearish)
    – a breakdown of the subsequent uptrend was really bearish
    – a break to new lows represented a potential bottom (bullish)

    Before I go any further, I want to point out that there were four significant bottoms in 2015-2016.  The first two came close to backtesting the 1.272 Fib at 1823, but didn’t quite make it.  The second two did.Now, let’s look at the same period, but comparing the 10Y (TNX) itself to SPX.  Note that SPX peaked shortly after TNX reached the falling red TL, and began having trouble once TNX broke out.

    SPX fell off its cliff when TNX fell back through the rising purple TL, making bottoms each time TNX did. On Jan 20, 2016, TNX tested its Aug and Sep lows, at which point SPX bottomed at 1812.  A week later, TNX plunged below the previous bottoms and didn’t bounce until it reached the Jan 2015 lows (dashed, purple line.)

    The message delivered by TNX was slightly different from the 10Y2Y:

    – rising up to tag the falling trend line represents a bearish turning point
    – breaking out above it is okay, as long as the uptrend continues
    – a breakdown of the subsequent rebound is really bearish
    – stocks won’t bottom until TNX does

    If we look at the chart below, we can see that the 10Y tracked the 10Y2Y quite closely until it diverged in late 2015 in a failed effort to support stock prices.  It didn’t provide decisive support until it bottomed in Feb 2016 at its Feb 2015 lows.  For a few brief days, the divergence disappeared.Why is this even remotely interesting, you might ask?

    As in 2015, we have also experienced a huge divergence between the 10Y2Y and the 10Y itself.  This is noteworthy in and of itself.But, the comparison gets even more interesting.   As in 2015, we have had an extended slump (14 months vs 17 in 2015), a breakout above the falling red trend line, and a backtest of the trend line.The big differences, so far, are that the spread hasn’t gone on to new highs and that the (presumed) low came as spreads were peaking and only two weeks (versus 8 months) following the peak.

    But, so far, the lessons from 2015 are holding.  The breakout above the falling red TL definitely produced a drop in stocks.  The backtest of the red TL has occurred, but it hasn’t quite reached the purple TL.  As long as it continues bouncing and doesn’t drop back through that TL, stocks should be able to continue rising.  The day it drops back through it, things could get nasty.

    Next, let’s look at the current TNX chart.  We could look at the drop since the Mar 2017 highs, but it was rather short-lived and the subsequent rebound has resembled a moon shot.  Instead, let’s look at the big picture.

    A trend line from the 2008 highs connected with the 2010, 2011 and 2017 highs.  After reversing at each, TNX was accompanied by a large drop in stocks.  TNX’s reversal from its 2013 highs never produced a stock selloff; but, then again, it didn’t quite reach the TL.

    Zooming in a little, we can see that TNX reached this trend line a couple of times in 2017: first, in March, when its reversal accompanied by a mild 78-pt drop in SPX, and again on Dec 20 in a reversal which never gathered any steam.  TNX was back to and punched through the TL on Jan 8.  It reached another TL (gray) drawn through other recent highs on Jan 22 at 26.65.  This was a potential top, meaning the bond folks breathed a sigh of relief.

    On Jan 26, however, it popped up through the gray trend line.  Not so coincidentally, that was the day that SPX peaked.Remember our lessons from TNX in 2015:

    1. reversing off the falling trend line represents a bearish turning point – it didn’t reverse

    2. breaking out above it is okay, as long as the uptrend continues – it did, but as it approached 3%, folks started getting nervous.

    3. a breakdown of the subsequent rebound is really bearish – we got a potential reversal at 29.43, but it has a long ways to go before reaching the rebound trend line, currently at 24.40.

    Interestingly, that TL intersects the falling red TL at about 24.60 on Mar 13, the day that CPI for February is reported.

    And this is where it gets interesting.  If TNX continues to rally, bond folks and equity folks will get nervous (the fiscal fiasco.)

    If it were to fall to the rising purple trend line and backtest the red trend line at 24.60, it might be somewhat bearish unless: (a) it reflects a big drop in inflation (in keeping with my oil and gas forecast) and (b) it rebounds there.

    If it fell below 24.60, the TNX lessons suggest that SPX would be in big trouble.  With a Fed meeting a week later, we can assume Powell et al would be focused on preventing that from happening.  But, as our analog suggests, this preceeds an important inflection point by just a few weeks.

    If TNX falls through 24.60, remember lesson 4…

    4.  stocks won’t bottom until TNX does

     *  *  *

    Now, onto our analog update. In our initial post and follow up from Feb 6-7 [see: Analog Watch], we anticipated SPX would rebound from 2533 (our downside target) to 2765 by Feb 14 and 2812 by Feb 23.  Instead, it bounced from 2532.69 to 2742 on Feb 16 and to 2789 — 23 points short and 4 days late — by Feb 27.

    An adjustment was clearly necessary, given that SPX and ES bottomed on different days.  We’ll try to reconcile the two, along with some economic forecasts which are definitely outside the norm.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • That Escalated Quickly!

    It was just last Tuesday we asked “where’s the bounce?”  SPX had gapped lower and failed to rebound the way it always seems to has for the past year.

    We had watched a trend line dating back to Dec 29 (below, in red) break down, and were wondering about the small, white channel.  From Where’s the Bounce?

    After that, it gets a little messy. ES has an important backtest at 2773, which would be 2730 on SPX — nothing all that important in the vicinity. Below that, however, the white 2.24 at 2703.62 remains very interesting. It would be a hell of a drop from here: 117 points or 4.1%.

    The closer we got to 2703, the more plausible it seemed.  When we reached it today, though, SPX leveled off for only about 10 minutes before plunging lower.  Why?

    There are two primary reasons.  The first, of course, is VIX.  Was there a single session this past year when I didn’t bitch about the degree to which timely beatdowns in VIX were triggering algos to bid up stocks?  Doubtful.

    After VIX broke out of the falling channel on Friday, Our charts suggested it would reach 16.29 and, if/when that broke, 25.65. 

    When 25.65 broke, at approximately 11:48 this morning, it triggered an additional wave of selling from those very same algos which have learned so well to take their clues from VIX’s every twitch.  Live by the sword…

    The second reason was USDJPY and the ubiquitous yen carry trade.  As we noted in our last update [see: Jan 24 Update on USDJPY], the pair reached a channel bottom which represented important support.

    We’ve reached the bottom of the rising white channel which has held on four previous occasions since its origin in late 2012…Bottom line, USDJPY isn’t necessarily done until DXY is done. We had bounces at the .500 and .618, so an overshoot to the .786 at 108.90 or even the .886 at 108.16 is a distinct possibility.

    As it so happens, the white channel bottom didn’t hold.  Despite Kuroda’s desperate jawboning, USDJPY has continued to falter.  It backtested trend line resistance yesterday — all well and good.

    But, instead of catching support as it almost always does, it broke down.  At 11:56, it dropped through a tiny trend line of support.  Seconds later, when that TL broke down……it broke down through a larger TL of support.

    Bottom line, VIX and USDJPY are the two most powerful drivers of algos there are (oil occasionally takes the lead.)  When they were going strong…melt up.  The slightest hint that they’re not…melt down.

    SPX bottomed out yesterday at 2638.17 and closed a good 55 points below the 2.24 Fib.  While it’s always scary to see major Fibonacci support fail, there was an obvious effort to keep the uptrend alive.  Note the SMA100 crosses the bottom of the rising channel which was established with the Feb 11, 2016 lows.  In other words, it’s important.

    Significantly, the channel bottom was defined by the Nov 9, 2016 lows.  If that date sounds familiar, it was the election night in the US.  And, it was the last time a major effort was made to salvage important Fibonacci support. [see: Why the Trump Rally Is a Fraud.]

    It worked spectacularly, resulting in a 38% rally.  All it took was a 17% spike in USDJPY, a 55% rally in oil, and a 63% collapse in VIX.

    How about now?  The algos are primed and conditioned to respond.  I’m sure Jim Bullard still knows his way to Bloomberg’s studios.  Can TPTB manufacture another recovery?  For the answer, we need only to examine two similar, previous meltdowns: the night of the US election in Nov 2016, and August 16, 2007.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Rally That VIX Built

    As discussed yesterday, stocks spent the night building a cushion based on VIX (currently off 5.4%) in preparation for tomorrow’s FOMC announcement.  It started just before the close, yesterday, and has built to a 6-pt gain in the futures.Actually, it’s been less of a rally, lately, and more of an effort to maintain ES at levels above its IH&S Pattern target reached back on Jun1.  Remember the mantra “stay fully invested, because you never know when a sudden rally will appear out of nowhere and you can’t afford to miss it”?  These days, it’s the corrections that pass in a flash, like Friday’s 31-pt plunge which was reversed so quickly that it won’t even register on daily charts.

    But, I digress.  Today’s action is all about putting more distance in between SPX and the Support Below Which it Must Not Go in the wake of the FOMC meeting.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Pulling Out All the Stops

    When unexpected unpleasantness unfurls, you can count on central banks to pull out all the stops. Such is the case with the British election results which, like Brexit, have wreaked havoc on FX markets.

    EURGBP, having broken down from its rising red channel dating back to mid-2015, was well on its way to a perfectly nice backtest at .80ish. Instead, it’s backtesting the broken red channel itself. Hence…the stop pulling.It should start with nice bounces from USDJPY and CL — which, as discussed yesterday, have already reached interim bottoms — and, of course, a sharp plunge by VIX.

    Look for USDJPY to pop through its SMA200 for good measure… …and CL at least hold its own in the midst of strong selling pressure.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • This is a Test

    Yesterday, we got a taste of what happens to United Airlines passengers who are “disruptive and belligerent.”   In what is being described as one of the biggest PR fails in recent memory, United CEO Oscar Munoz defended the action taken to forcefully drag an Asian-American doctor from a flight that United had overbooked.

    No doubt United would have found the volunteers it needed had it upped the compensation it was offering to $1,000, $1,500 or even $2,000.  Instead, it will pay millions to the passenger, and many more millions in lost revenues from prospective passengers who are too horrified to “fly the friendly skies.”

    The stock is likely headed for at least 61.72, a 14% drop from yesterday’s highs — about $3 billion off its market cap.  And, that would be a positive outcome — if it’s able to hold both horizontal support and its SMA200.

    While the event itself was shocking, it’s equally surprising that the CEO of a major airline could be so tone deaf as to email his employees that “I want to commend you for continuing to go above and beyond to ensure we fly right.”

    The most interesting CEO on the world stage, right now, is our own Donald Trump.  He faces much greater challenges than Munoz did: escalating military conflicts with both Syria and North Korea and, by proxy, Russia and China.

    We’ve had a taste of Trump’s leadership skills with respect to the battles over health care, tax reform, and scores of executive orders relating to the environment, energy, etc.  He won some, and he lost some. None of those, however, involved the risk of nuclear war.

    Is it any wonder that investors are a little nervous and stocks have, so far, not shaken off this particular geopolitical risk?

    On Feb 10, SPX broke out of a large, year-old channel that was averaging 17% YoY returns.  It has backtested that channel top seven times in the past several weeks — including a serious plunge below it on Mar 27.

    Today, it’s happening again.  Will it survive this test?  It might just depend on whether or not Trump survives his.

    continued… (more…)

  • Fed Minutes: How Hawkish Are They?

    Markets tend to moves higher on Fed minutes days, even if the news isn’t all that positive.  It’s all about convincing investors that the FOMC has their best interests at heart — that all they’re worried about is making sure that stocks continue to rally.

    Today’s session is slightly complicated, then, by ADP employment which came in much higher than expected: 263K versus 175K.  Theoretically, this puts pressure on the FOMC to raise rates and/or trim their balance sheet faster than anticipated.  But, central banks have many tools at their disposal to ensure that the complication doesn’t become a problem.

    S&P 500 futures are up 6.5 points, but right to Fib resistance.  

    Can the Fed spin a hawkish set of minutes into something positive for stocks?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Gold: Following the Yellow Brick Road

    I’m not a gold bug.  I’ve always thought the price is pretty heavily manipulated (long before it hit the headlines) and I guess I’ve avoided it on principle.  Looking back at my forecasts over the past year or so, that was probably a mistake.

    Since our December 14, 2015 forecast, GC has gained about 19% — not shabby.  However, if one heeded the forecasts offered with each subsequent update, the net return would have been over 80%.

    I’ve said many times, lately, that forecasting stocks has become a lot tougher than forecasting the various drivers of stock prices.  In the case of gold, it is obviously affected by the value of the US dollar, which is an important component of USDJPY — a key driver of equity algos.

    Thus, GC — like USDJPY, WTI and VIX — is one of those things that’s been relatively easy to forecast even though I’ve devoted only the occasional hour or two to its study.  Before we touch on today’s forecast, let’s take a look at the past year’s periodic forecasts.The numbers in the above chart correspond to the posts below.

    1. Dec 14, 2015 (GC: 1060):
      “If DX plunges further, as I expect it will, GC’s 4th bounce could be a doozy: 1150-1180 for starters, and 1286 after that.”  GC reached 1180 by Feb 8, topped out at 1287.80 on Mar 11.
    2. Mar 4, 2016 (GC: 1280):
      “I’d be very cautious in chasing GC at this point…acts like it’s reversing between here and 1286…take the gains…it could easily backtest the .618 at 1207.60.”  GC reached 1286 the next week, then reversed to backtest 1206.
    3. April 8, 2016 (GC: 1240):
      “If [gold] breaks above the purple midline [at 1270] then 1379-1380 is the next logical target…”   Gold reached 1377.50 three months later.
    4. July 7, 2016 (GC: 1361):
      “Our target range from April 8 was 1379-1380.  Yesterday’s 1377.50 was probably close enough.  If it can’t make new highs today, the next stop is the neckline at 1307..”  GC, which peaked at 1377.50 on Jul 6, dropped 5% to 1310 over the next 2 weeks.
    5. Aug 26, 2016 (GC: 1324):
      “…[there’s a] huge IH&S Pattern, the neckline of which is the former high at 1307ish.  If TPTB are serious about discrediting GC anytime soon it’ll involve getting it back below that [1307] support.”  GC tumbled to 1307, testing it three times before breaking down to 1243 on Oct 7.
    6. Oct 7, 2016 (GC: 1254): “…GC tagged its SMA200 and the bottom of a pretty good looking channel earlier — usually good for a bounce.”  GC bottomed the next day at 1243, bounced for a month, reached 1339 on Nov 9.
    7. Nov 14, 2016 (GC: 1227): …GC’s channel finally broke down two days ago and has potential to 1083 — a 12% drop from here.  What better way to finish the year out?  GC plunged 103 (8.4%) over the next month.
    8. Dec 5, 2016 (GC: 1175): If the .618 [1172.40] breaks down, then the next support isn’t until the red TL at 1130, followed by the .886 at 1083.50… GC reached 1130 on Dec 15.
    9. Dec 15, 2016 (GC: 1129): “GC is currently testing an important internal TL of support… a potentially important test…that could produce a bounce to the purple midline [at 1230] or the SMA200 — currently at 1278.”  GC reached the SMA200 at 1264.60 on Feb 27.

    After tagging its 200-day average in February, gold tumbled about 67, back below a key channel midline.  But, it is right back in the swing of things, having nearly reached the SMA200 a second time just yesterday.

    With all the discussion about what the Fed will or won’t do for the rest of the year, what’s next?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Reproach and Retreat

    The first big Republican victory — the repeal and replace of the ACA — has morphed into reproach and retreat.  The net impact: what does this failure portend for the rest of the Trump agenda and, thus, the Trump Rally?

    Regular readers know that I’ve looked askance at this rally from the start [see: Why the “Trump Rally” is a Fraud.]  It was born of a sharp reversal in CL, USDJPY and VIX — the key algo drivers.  Momentum traders jumped on board as it rose.  And, somewhere along the way, mainstream investors convinced themselves that the new and improved outlook justified an 18% rally.

    But, live by the algo, die by the algo.  The yen had to appreciate to compensate for higher oil prices.  Higher US and euroland inflation necessitated a drop in oil and gas.  And, front-running the Fed’s tepid response to spiking inflation was widespread.  With the Trump Rally narrative in doubt, there were simply too many plates to keep spinning.

    Futures are off 22.50 at the moment, leaving us some clues as to what to expect for SPX.  But, the more important side of the equation is where do WTI and the USDJPY dip to?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Horseshoes and Hand Grenades

    There’s an old expression that says “close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades.”  So, we spent most of the day yesterday wondering whether the day’s 2336.45 lows were close enough to our long-held downside target of 2335.34.The tag was marred by premature reversals in oil and VIX.  Did the guys working the algos not get the message?  Or, were they just a little over-eager?  Admittedly, it’s tough to nail a precise value in an index as unwieldy as the S&P 500.  But, they went to all the trouble of engineering a backtest of a key Fib level.  You’d think they’d care…

    continued for members… (more…)