pebblewriter

Tag: stocks

  • The Market’s Latest “Lucky” Bounce

    That’s a relief!  For months, pundits have been arguing whether the Fed needed to hike interest rates three times or four times this year — you know, because of all the growth coming down the pike.

    Fed Über-Dove and “Man Who Thinks Market Integrity is Overrated” Jim Bullard just announced that the correct number is zero.  That’s right.  Everything is perfect just like it is.

    Amazingly, and quite by coincidence, this pronouncement occurred on the exact same day that several stock market indices were in danger of falling below a very important technical level of support: their 200-day moving averages.  As we discussed on Monday, falling below the SMA200 isn’t usually very healthy for markets.

    For visitors and new members, this seems like a good time to take a walk down memory lane.  This isn’t Mr Bullard’s first rodeo.  Nor is it the first time “someone” did something clever to ensure the market’s continued ascent.

    The S&P 500 illustrates the phenomenon quite well, having experienced a number of such fortunate events at crucial times. October 2014 – Bullard!

    Bullard appeared on Bloomberg to explain that another round of QE might be in order. As “luck” would have it, this enabled SPX to reverse right as it reached important Fibonacci support, ending a 9.9% tumble and narrowly averting an official correction.

    Big assist from USDJPY, which soared 16% over the next 7 weeks in spite of the fact that more QE should have weakened the US dollar.  The Yen Carry Trade in all its glory.

    August 2015 – USDJPY!

    This 12.5% correction was set up by USDJPY falling back below a critical Fibonacci level (the .618 at 120.11) in the wake of SPX reaching a key Fibonacci extension (the 1.618 at 2138.)

    We had correctly forecast the top [see: The Last Big Butterfly] but it was unclear whether or not USDJPY could remain above 120.  SPX plummeted when 120 finally fell but, as “luck” would have it, was (temporarily) rescued by USDJPY’s bounce back above it.

    February 2016 – Oil!

    The price of West Texas Intermediate Oil (CL) had fallen 77% between Aug 2013 and Feb 2016.  While this crushed inflation to a manageable level, it made investors in and lenders to energy-related companies pretty nervous.

    As “luck” would have it, CL bottomed out on Feb 11, 2016 — the exact same day that SPX reached that critical Fibonacci support level of 1823.  CL doubled over the next four months, and SPX rebounded sharply.  By accurately forecast the bottom in oil, we could confidently call a bottom for SPX [see: USDJPY Finally Relents.]June 2016 – USDJPY!

    Stocks plunged in the wake of the Brexit vote.  As “luck” would have it, USDJPY — which had used CL’s rally as an opportunity to reset — picked this particular day to bottom out and spiked 8% higher over the following month.

    Futures had sold off by 6.5%, but by the time SPX opened the next morning the recovery was well underway.  It was soon back above its recent highs and the critical 1.618 extension at 1.618.  In other words: new all-time highs.

    November 2016 – Trump*!  Unfortunately for stocks, the US election results weren’t conducive to a rally.  Once Trump’s election became apparent, futures plummeted over 5% in a matter of hours.  SPX had bounced off its SMA200 a few days earlier.  Unless something was done quickly, it would drop through this key support the following morning.As “luck” would have it, USDJPY picked this particular day to bottom out.  It spiked 5% over the next few hours and 18% over the next few weeks — a supersized version of the exercise which had saved stocks post-Brexit.

    And, if that weren’t enough, VIX — the widely accepted indicator of fear and volatility — plummeted even as futures were plunging.  It’s the equivalent of calling your insurance broker to cancel your homeowner’s policy as a hurricane bears down on your beach house.  How very, very “lucky” indeed.Futures recovered almost all of their losses by the time the cash market opened the following morning. VIX went on to shed over 50% of its value and broke down through trend line support (above, the white arrow.)

    Stocks were soon registered new all-time highs. The talking heads called it the “Trump Rally” and attributed the gains to the incoming president’s pro-business orientation and deal-making acumen. But, I think it deserves an asterisk…on account of the incredible “luck” involved [see: Why the Trump Rally is a Fraud.]

    The SPX chart isn’t labeled as such, but the rise from 2138 to 2703 (the next major Fib level) wouldn’t have been possible without continued support from oil and VIX.  After doubling in value, CL proceeded to construct a well-formed rising channel (below, in purple) that was very supportive of stocks.  It oscillated between the channel’s top and bottom like clockwork — until December 2017.  We’ll come back to that.Also during that time, VIX was trying something new.  After years of occasionally bouncing off the bottom of a long-term channel (below, the yellow arrows) it decided to plunge below that channel bottom and spend 80% of its subsequent days in the cellar — reaching new all-time lows in the process.This sent a strong all-clear signal to stocks (or, at least the algos that trigger stock purchases) that the coast was clear. It was completely safe to buy stocks, which they did — producing a rally that accelerated all the way up to the 2.24 extension at 2703.

    December 2017 – Oil!

    At that point, oil’s breakout (remember the purple channel above?) and the onslaught of new, daily lows in VIX combined to give SPX the boost it needed to climb above that resistance.  I mean, how “lucky” can you get?  It popped above 2703 and tacked on another 6.3% for good measure.

    Unfortunately for stocks, though, there was a practical limit to how high CL could go without creating problems.  Someone had forgotten that higher oil prices mean higher inflation.  And, higher inflation means higher interest rates.  And, when you’re $21 trillion in debt and pass a tax bill and budget that greatly widen the deficit considerably…higher interest rates are not exactly lucky [see: Why Higher Interest Rates Are a Problem This Time.]

    Between that realization and a growing disconnect between price and supply & demand, CL had to drop.  When it did, and the (dashed, red) trend line from August 2017 finally broke down, stocks didn’t take it well.SPX plunged almost 12% over the next two weeks, one of the sharpest corrections ever.  Luckily, the SMA200 was there to catch it.  A few days later, CL popped back above its channel top and SPX recovered to back above 2703.

    As the bounce began to fade, we had a surprise message from Bullard that “too many rate hikes could slow the economy.”  It was enough to extend SPX’s bounce for another few weeks.  But, ultimately it slipped back down below 2703 to tag its SMA200 again.  And, again.  And, again.  And, again.

    By then, DJIA and RUT had finally risen to the point where they could tag their SMA200s as well.  SPX bounced at our 2561 target.  Investors were in luck!  Until this morning.

    April 2018 – Bullard!

    Apparently, someone forgot to explain to the Chinese that we were supposed to win the trade war (winning them is easy!)  This morning, we found out that China had the gall to fight back.  When I was woken by an price alert at 3:15 this morning, the futures were off 55 points.  SPX would open back below its SMA200.

    But, the futures didn’t know what they were up against!

    Then came Larry Kudlow, the guy who in May 2008 called the impending Great Financial Crisis a “non-recession recession.”  Some people might have misunderstood; but, obviously he meant it would be much worse than a recession.  (I can’t wait to find the pot of gold!)

    As “luck” would have it, the market was quite pleased with all this positive scuttlebutt.   ES, once down 55 points, closed up 34 points.  SPX and the Dow rose about 1%.  RUT added 1.30%.  And, COMP — which never did tag its SMA200 — popped 1.45%.  Take that, 200-day moving average!

    Bounces are nice, whether driven by oil, the USDJPY or Fed cheerleaders.  This one got SPX back above its SMA200, which is a good start.  Next comes the 2.24 Fib, which SPX has crossed some twenty times in the past two months.  Can it rise back above and stay there this time?

    Oil’s limitations haven’t disappeared.  Managing inflation and interest rate expectations will continue to dominate its price action.  Lately, the market has a very narrow range within which it feels comfortable.

    USJDPY is threatening to break out from a falling flag pattern, but one has to wonder why it hasn’t done so already.  Japan got no love from Trump in the trade war chatter to date.  It’s quite possible they’re done cooperating with currency intervention. VIX, after popping back above the yellow channel bottom in dramatic fashion in February, has fallen back to a trend line (red, dashed) from its January lows.  Every time it pops above the trend line, SPX stumbles.  Every time it drops below it, SPX rips.  Today, it tagged it and reversed lower – hence the day’s gains.  It has plenty of additional downside potential, with the potential to drive stocks back above 2700.  But, again, it hasn’t done so yet.

    It makes one wonder whether SPX will be allowed to put in a lower low in order to make the corrective wave look a little more conventional and give COMP a shot at its SMA200.  We have oodles and oodles of downside targets if SPX’s SMA200 should fail.  That white dot at 2138 in the chart above is there for a reason [see: More Where That Came From.]

    There are countless other factors I haven’t even mentioned: our yield curve model (which tentatively turned bullish today), 10yr note rates, the US dollar’s buoyancy, various momentum indicators, and the continuing sagas of FB, TSLA, AMZN and DB — all of which have played a role in the market’s gyrations (mostly of the bad luck variety.)

    Whatever happens, it’s hard to imagine we could reach new highs without plenty more luck.  Trade safe, and stay tuned.

     

     

     

     

     

  • Update on COMP: Mar 20, 2018

    Facebook is only 5.5% of the Nasdaq Composite (COMP), but yesterday’s plunge [see: Facebook Flops] was a good reminder to update our outlook.

    In our last update [see: Nov 6, 2017 Update] we identified 7619.37 as our next upside target.

    At this point, it’s pushing into the top quadrant of the rising white channel where it will soon reach the top of the rising purple channel — currently at 7260.

    It probably won’t stop there, though, as the 1.618 and the rising white channel intersect at 7619.37 at the end of the year. It’s too convenient a target to ignore. And, I fully expect it to reach it unless we get a nasty surprise on the geopolitical front.

    As it happened, COMP’s tag of 7619 was delayed by the February correction. It topped out last week and has since retreated 352 points — about 4.5%.  Since COMP reached its important 1.618 Fibonacci extension and the top of a well-formed channel, it’s fair to ask whether there’s more downside ahead.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • RUT: How it Got Here, Where it’s Going

    About a month ago, as part of the series of charts inspired by our latest analog [see: Analog Details Feb 7, 2018] I hazarded a forecast for RUT that called for a rebound to the rising white channel (which had recently broken down) by Feb 14, a retracement on Mar 1, and a subsequent rally back into the rising white channel. The only serious uncertainty at the time was whether ES’ tag of its SMA200 was sufficient — or whether SPX would need to follow suit.

    In any case, SPX did go on to tag its own SMA200 the following day, meaning RUT posted a slightly lower low before rebounding.  It reached the white channel on Feb 14 as expected, but continued leaking higher for several days before putting in a low as scheduled on Mar 1.Since then, it has nonchalantly rejoined the rising white channel as though nothing was ever wrong.  It has done this many times in the past, of course.  So, that’s not terribly noteworthy.

    What is interesting is that the Feb 9 plunge facilitated an important backtest that should help determine whether it has further upside ahead.  What’s fascinating is the extent to which nearly every one of RUT’s twists and turns has been driven by algos.

    The precision of these moves leaves little doubt that they’re by design.  No random walk, here.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Why Rising Rates Are a Problem This Time

    A sharp drop in interest rates has traditionally been a negative for stocks.  The chart below shows that most significant declines in 10-year yields over the years were associated with steep drops in the S&P 500.  Usually, equity losses precipitated the drops in yield.  As stock declines accelerate, money flows into bonds — raising prices and depressing yields.  The crashes of 2000-2003 and 2007-2009 are striking examples.  So are the corrections of 2010, 2011, 2015 and 2016.

    There were several exceptions, when stocks were supported through carry trades and other algo-stroking forces: the 15% rise in SPX between Dec 2013 and Feb 2015, the minor 6.1% drop between Mar and Jul 2016, and the 2.5% rise between Mar and Sep 2017.

    But, significantly, not a single equity correction occurred without a concurrent and significant drop in yields.  This begs the question, then, of whether increases in yields are positive for stocks.

    In 2008, yields bottomed almost 2 months before stocks did in 2009.  But, in the 2000-2003 crash, yields bottomed 9 months after stocks.  Most other yield rallies from significant bottoms also lagged stocks: 4 months in Oct 2010, 9 months in Jul 2012, 3 months in Jan 2015, 5 months in Jul 2016.

    It would seem at least some bond buyers take a “show me” approach, waiting until the coast is clear in equities before shifting money back into bonds.  This analysis ignores the considerable influence that Fed purchases had on bond yields — an influence which the Fed maintains will diminish over the next few years.

    So, what are we to make of the latest spike in yields which began on Sep 7, 2017?  The 10Y rose from 2.03% to 2.94% through Feb 21.  SPX rallied along with it, up almost 17% by Jan 26 — then promptly did a gut wrenching 11.8% nosedive in only 2 weeks.

    Fortunately for the bulls, it got a strong bounce off its 200-day moving average and subsequently bounced to its 61.8% retracement. But, pundits seem fixated on the 10Y with rates nudging up against 3%.  Does it matter?

    In a word, yes.  Even though 3% is still well below historical yields, the level of debt has risen dramatically over the years.  The chart below shows the annual interest expense (the orange line) and the US’ rapidly growing pile of debt. Superimposed over each is the average interest rate (the black line) paid on that debt.

    Even though interest rates have flatlined since 2013, the expense of servicing the rapidly expanding debt has risen sharply — recently breaking out to all-time highs.

    Clearly, if rates were to normalize the interest expense would be unmanageable.  How unmanageable, you ask?

    Between 2000 and 2007, the average interest rate was 4.84%.  On the current $20.6 trillion balance, that would mean an annual interest expense of roughly $1 trillion.  And, we haven’t even begun to talk about the effect on consumer debt, the mortgage market, debt issued to fund corporate buybacks, etc.

    Obviously, an increase in the 10Y yield doesn’t immediately reprice the entire pile of debt.  But, it’s a clear step in the wrong direction.  And, investors are right to be concerned.  I imagine the Fed is also quite concerned — which is why I put a target of 2.85% on the 10Y back on Jan 10 [see: China – It’s Not Me, It’s You.]

    Not only did it represent channel and Fib resistance, but it seemed like a good tipping point for what I expected to be rising concern (one can hope) about our shaky fiscal situation.  TNX overshot it a little, which has been fairly common over the years (Feb 2011, Sep and Dec 2013, etc.)

    Those previous overshoots typically helped stocks get past resistance.  It might work this time, too.  But, judging from the mood out there, I don’t believe stocks will be led higher by higher interest yields this time.  And, I have trouble believing the Fed isn’t working to put a lid on long rates – yield curve be damned.

     *  *  *

    Related Posts:

    Where To Next?
    The End is (Probably) Near
    CPI: The Charade Continues
    Update on Bonds: Jan 29, 2018

     

  • Pulling Out All the Stops

    When unexpected unpleasantness unfurls, you can count on central banks to pull out all the stops. Such is the case with the British election results which, like Brexit, have wreaked havoc on FX markets.

    EURGBP, having broken down from its rising red channel dating back to mid-2015, was well on its way to a perfectly nice backtest at .80ish. Instead, it’s backtesting the broken red channel itself. Hence…the stop pulling.It should start with nice bounces from USDJPY and CL — which, as discussed yesterday, have already reached interim bottoms — and, of course, a sharp plunge by VIX.

    Look for USDJPY to pop through its SMA200 for good measure… …and CL at least hold its own in the midst of strong selling pressure.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Price Alert: Gold

    Gold is approaching our next upside target from two weeks ago [see: Gold – Following the Yellow Brick Road.]

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Gold: Following the Yellow Brick Road

    I’m not a gold bug.  I’ve always thought the price is pretty heavily manipulated (long before it hit the headlines) and I guess I’ve avoided it on principle.  Looking back at my forecasts over the past year or so, that was probably a mistake.

    Since our December 14, 2015 forecast, GC has gained about 19% — not shabby.  However, if one heeded the forecasts offered with each subsequent update, the net return would have been over 80%.

    I’ve said many times, lately, that forecasting stocks has become a lot tougher than forecasting the various drivers of stock prices.  In the case of gold, it is obviously affected by the value of the US dollar, which is an important component of USDJPY — a key driver of equity algos.

    Thus, GC — like USDJPY, WTI and VIX — is one of those things that’s been relatively easy to forecast even though I’ve devoted only the occasional hour or two to its study.  Before we touch on today’s forecast, let’s take a look at the past year’s periodic forecasts.The numbers in the above chart correspond to the posts below.

    1. Dec 14, 2015 (GC: 1060):
      “If DX plunges further, as I expect it will, GC’s 4th bounce could be a doozy: 1150-1180 for starters, and 1286 after that.”  GC reached 1180 by Feb 8, topped out at 1287.80 on Mar 11.
    2. Mar 4, 2016 (GC: 1280):
      “I’d be very cautious in chasing GC at this point…acts like it’s reversing between here and 1286…take the gains…it could easily backtest the .618 at 1207.60.”  GC reached 1286 the next week, then reversed to backtest 1206.
    3. April 8, 2016 (GC: 1240):
      “If [gold] breaks above the purple midline [at 1270] then 1379-1380 is the next logical target…”   Gold reached 1377.50 three months later.
    4. July 7, 2016 (GC: 1361):
      “Our target range from April 8 was 1379-1380.  Yesterday’s 1377.50 was probably close enough.  If it can’t make new highs today, the next stop is the neckline at 1307..”  GC, which peaked at 1377.50 on Jul 6, dropped 5% to 1310 over the next 2 weeks.
    5. Aug 26, 2016 (GC: 1324):
      “…[there’s a] huge IH&S Pattern, the neckline of which is the former high at 1307ish.  If TPTB are serious about discrediting GC anytime soon it’ll involve getting it back below that [1307] support.”  GC tumbled to 1307, testing it three times before breaking down to 1243 on Oct 7.
    6. Oct 7, 2016 (GC: 1254): “…GC tagged its SMA200 and the bottom of a pretty good looking channel earlier — usually good for a bounce.”  GC bottomed the next day at 1243, bounced for a month, reached 1339 on Nov 9.
    7. Nov 14, 2016 (GC: 1227): …GC’s channel finally broke down two days ago and has potential to 1083 — a 12% drop from here.  What better way to finish the year out?  GC plunged 103 (8.4%) over the next month.
    8. Dec 5, 2016 (GC: 1175): If the .618 [1172.40] breaks down, then the next support isn’t until the red TL at 1130, followed by the .886 at 1083.50… GC reached 1130 on Dec 15.
    9. Dec 15, 2016 (GC: 1129): “GC is currently testing an important internal TL of support… a potentially important test…that could produce a bounce to the purple midline [at 1230] or the SMA200 — currently at 1278.”  GC reached the SMA200 at 1264.60 on Feb 27.

    After tagging its 200-day average in February, gold tumbled about 67, back below a key channel midline.  But, it is right back in the swing of things, having nearly reached the SMA200 a second time just yesterday.

    With all the discussion about what the Fed will or won’t do for the rest of the year, what’s next?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Betwixt and Between

    SPX and ES managed to hold key trend lines and channels yesterday, bouncing from just short of our downside targets to exactly where we expected.  All it took was an 18.3% hammering of VIX — no problem for the Masters of the Universe (real subtle, guys!)

    But, there was no breakout.  There wasn’t even an overnight ramp job.

    This somewhat validates our theory about the oil and USDJPY two-step, meaning we should be looking for a big, sudden move in the currency markets as soon as today.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • One Way or Another

    After allowing a six-session slump (that saw SPX nail our downside target), The Powers That Be can be forgiven for insisting on an overnight ramp job.Last night, it was USDJPY pushing through horizontal resistance, VIX getting clobbered through three separate moving averages, and oil continuing a nice bounce off our 48.63 target.  It should be enough to get SPX up over its SMA10 on the opening bell.

    Since the bounce is mostly about oil’s “recovery,” we’ll focus today on what to expect over the next few weeks.

    Oh, and for those of you who clicked on this post expecting to get their Debbie Harry fix, HERE YOU GO.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Next Steps

    We’ve been watching a triangle form for over a month, wondering whether/when it would break out or break down. Yesterday, we got our answer.

    After coming within .40 of our 2170-2173 target on Monday, the triangle broke down — despite vigorous intraday ramping in USDJPY and CL.  Tuesday’s initial downside target at 2150 was taken out without any difficulty.

    New market-health-indicator Deutsche Bank, which reached our 13.98 target (+18.7%) from our bottom call on Sep 27, is wavering.  Having briefly pushed through resistance, it’s now clinging to support.2016-10-12-db-60-0600What’s next for stocks?

    continued for members… (more…)