pebblewriter

Tag: DXY

  • Delay of Game

    Nothing much has changed since yesterday.  SPX bounced around in our target zone, coming within a few points of its SMA200 as VIX went nowhere.

    The one notable exception was AAPL, which after tagging our downside target on Jan 3 $from last November [see: AAPL Discovers Gravity] reached our upside target yesterday. We originally charted this upside target on Jan 3 [see: Update on AAPL, Jan 3] and the IH&S pattern reinforced it three weeks later.  Had AAPL not reversed, the additional downside potential was substantial.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Charts I’m Watching: Nov 5, 2018

    Futures are back to flat, having bounced a bit on the Iran sanction news as it provided a modest (so far) bounce for oil and gas prices.The market has a wait and see feel to it this morning, with AAPL breaking down further……but, the algos all but ignoring it, focusing instead on dollar strength (TNX is higher again) and oil’s potential recovery.  AAPL is now off almost 14% and is nearing our channel target [see: All Eyes on AAPL] with the gap close target of 195.96 and SMA200 target (currently 192.44) looking better all the time.

    Members might wish to revisit last week’s post on VIX [see: VIX’s Warning] in which we discussed the bearish implications of the impending 50/200 cross.  This morning, it’s alive and well.continued for members…

    (more…)

  • Coincidences and Consequences

    It’s interesting how Khashoggi’s murder top-ticked oil and gas prices…

    …and, so soon after Trump’s latest demand that OPEC lower oil prices.

    I’m certainly not insinuating that Trump had anything to do with Khashoggi’s murder.

    But, OPEC ignored Trump’s Sep 20 demand.  Two weeks later, oil prices had spiked 10% higher.  Since Oct 3, the day of the murder, WTI has fallen 14.5% and RBOB has fallen 16.7%.

    As Churchill famously said, “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

     *  *  *

    Sometimes it’s quite difficult to anticipate a major market move.  You’ve got hundreds of companies, all with their own earnings, outlooks, and market-moving headlines.  Then, there’s the economic news of the day, both domestic and foreign.  And, of course, there are geopolitical developments such as who’s dismembering or cozying up to whom?

    And, sometimes it’s not so difficult at all. It can be as simple as the VIX chart we’ve discussed all week.  From Time to Panic on Tuesday:

    Note that VIX need only break the purple TL [for SPX to bounce.] If VIX doesn’t break down, this should be the end of the line for this bounce.

    It didn’t bounce.  SPX plunged.  Next?

    Or it can be slightly more complex, but still fairly straightforward — such as is the case with oil and gas.

    As we all know, central bank support (low interest rates, among other accommodations) has been critical to stock prices since 2009.  Low interest rates, of course, rely on low inflation.  And, low inflation relies to a great extent on low oil and gas prices (more accurately, low MoM and YoY increases in those prices.

    From last April in Oil & Gas, Inflation and Interest Rates: A Delicate Balance or Goal Seeking?

    The complicating factor, of course, is that oil and gas prices took over the job of stimulating algos (chief among the 90% of all trading activity which is conducted by machines) to drive stocks higher.

    Most recently, oil, gas and SPX all bottomed on Feb 11, 2016 and oil and gas prices played an integral role in stimulating the subsequent rally.  The most important nudge was in December 2017, when oil and gas prices broke out of an already rising channel.

    To chartists, and to algos, this is a very bullish maneuver.  It also has the effect of driving inflation and interest rates higher. CPI rose from 2.11% in December 2017 to 2.95 in July 2018.  The 10Y rose from 2.31% in December to 3.24% just a few weeks ago.

    The Fed told us they were okay with this, that they were going to let the economy and inflation “run hot.”  I was among the many doubters, citing the damage that higher rates would inflict on our already alarming budget deficit, but darned if they didn’t do it anyway. I suppose that, at the end of the day, a temporary increase in the rate at which the debt and interest expense are expanding was less important than having a higher perch from which to crash rates during the next GFC.

    Stocks ignored the implications for a while, happy to play follow the leader with oil and gas prices.  The day that RBOB popped out of the rising purple channel was the day that SPX popped above its 2.24 Fibonacci extension at 2703 – a level which might otherwise have provided serious overhead resistance.  It can be seen as the horizontal, purple trend line on the chart below. In early February, though, RBOB’s breakout faltered.  No surprise, but SPX followed along, suffering its biggest and sharpest decline in years.  Like magic, RB quickly popped back above the purple channel top – rescuing SPX and helping it back above 2703.

    Note that SPX went on to new all-time highs in September, only after RB backtested the purple channel and bounced higher.

    And this lovely little correction we’re enjoying?  SPX topped the day that RB failed to break out of the falling yellow channel (also the day of Khashoggi’s murder.)  SPX fell through its 200-day moving average on the day that RB plunged back below the purple channel top.  And, SPX plunged below 2703 on the day that RB fell out of the falling yellow channel.

    With the elections less than two weeks away, I’m not expecting a sharp rebound in oil and gas prices any time soon.  So, the algos will have to rely on other tools — such as VIX, which has now shed 12.5% since tagged our 26 target yesterday.

    So far, VIX’s decline has produced a pretty nifty bounce.  Is it enough to offset weakness in oil and gas and a hawkish Fed which has been browbeaten by a “low-interest rate president?”

    continued for members... (more…)

  • It’s a Wonderful Market

    SPX and ES had no trouble reaching our initial downside targets — a backtest of their January highs.  We wondered, however, whether the SMA20s, loitering just below, might come into play.

    Sure enough, ES tagged its SMA20 with ease.  But, emini traders strongly resisted a drop through the SMA20 – bad mojo, don’t you know.

    So, SPX only reached 2867.29, just shy of the SMA20 at 2866.27. And, faster than you can shout “help me Clarence!” SPX bounced the 16 points we anticipated, just like it did on Wednesday.

    It was a near miss..or, was it?  As we discussed on Tuesday…

    One little trick we often see on days when it’s difficult to convince the machines to sell/short down to an obvious bounce point such as the SMA10 is to drive the price merely to where the SMA10 will be tomorrow.  The SMA10 will likely increase by another 5 points tomorrow, so getting within 2-3 points is potentially “good enough.”

    As luck the algos would have it, today’s SMA20 came in at…wait for it…2866.27.  January highs and SMA20 were both tagged.  So, all is well, right?  Not so fast.  Futures are currently off 10 points, banks are tanking, oil and gas are slipping, FB is scurrying toward the basement and TSLA has tumbled 15% since Tuesday’s short call.

    In the distance, sirens.  A mob of nervous investors crowds the door.  Might the Building & Loan actually be in trouble?

    Thanks to overeager algos, the S&P 500 has thus far ignored the threats of tariffs, political turmoil, emerging market meltdowns, rising interest rates and historically high multiples. None of that matters as long as corporations can borrow cheap and repurchase their own shares, VIX can be hammered when necessary, the dollar continues rising and oil/gas prices don’t crash.

    If any of those support mechanisms falters, however…  Well, we’ve seen what can happen.  Keep an eye on 2867.29.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • A Backtest or More?

    Today should shape up as a battle between holding a much-cherished round number (SPX 2900) and backtesting solid support (the January highs.)

    The futures are off about 5, with yesterday’s downside target of 2878.50-2881.95 still looking good — if SPX will relinquish 2900.

    Much will depend on the yen, which is strengthening in the midst of the EM turmoil…

    …and the 10Y, which has been in a holding pattern for months.  It looks ripe for a breakdown, but that would almost certainly invert the curve and usher in more than a backtest.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Currency Complications

    USDJPY reached our target at the SMA100/SMA200 overnight, at least temporarily bringing the pair back below the top of the falling white channel from which it broke out on July 10.  Readers will recall that breakout was instrumental in helping SPX break above its faux IH&S neckline 66 points ago.

    A USDJPY rebound here is all stocks might need to make new highs.  EURUSD, which is backtesting after a major channel breakdown, would certainly support a strengthening of the USD……as would DXY — which is the latest victim of “unpresidented” tweets.

    As central bankers have recently discovered, however, there are complications from continued dollar strength which would suggest that it will take a break here.  Will they heed those warnings, or are new all-time highs in equity markets more important?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Update on Gold: Apr 11, 2018

    In our last major update [see: Jan 26 Update] we noted that gold, 1355 at the time, had reached the same price level at which it had frequently reversed.  Even though we’d had a bullseye at 1377-1380 for over a year, it had stopped short several times.

    GC is sitting just below the neckline of the huge IH&S that could result in a significant breakout.  The fly in the ointment: I don’t think TPTB will let it break out.  So, you should either take profits here in the 1348-1365 range, or at least set your stops at this level.

    As it happened, 1365 (reached the day before) was the cycle high.  Gold tumbled 4.1%, then bounced around between roughly 1308 and 1362 for the next two months.  Our interim posts caught most of the moves:

      * * *

    Feb 8: Analog Details  “[Gold] has dropped 4.1% since reversing where expected in late Jan, and just reached fanline and double channel support [1321.] Could it finally be ready to tag 1377-1380?”  Bottomed that day, rallied to 1364 over the following week (+2.51%.)

    Feb 15: Where to, Next?  “GC might have run out of steam here [1360.] Cautious types should consider taking profits, while the daredevils out there remain focused on 1380.” Topped out the following day at 1364 (+2.95%.)

    Feb 27: Powell’s French Toast   “Gold is getting clobbered…our analog suggests a Mar 1 turning point. The SMA100 should be around 1303 by then and would be a better bounce spot.”  Bottomed on Mar 1 at 1303.60 (+4.15%.)

    Mar 27: Algos to Markets – All Better  “GC, which tagged its 1362 resistance yet again, has retreated once more… It still has a good shot at 1380, but only if/when DXY finally breaks down.” Reached 1369.40 today (+5.05%.)

     * * *

    So, here we are, sitting on a tidy 14.7% gain.  It’s not terrible for 2 1/2 months work, considering gold has only netted a 0.9% gain during that period.  But, I hate to leave money on the table. Is it time to pull the plug on 1377-1380?  Or, are we about to reach or exceed it?

    continued for members…

    The two major factors at work are the ongoing saga of the US dollar and the possibility of a shooting war with Russia in Syria.  I can’t speak to the question of a war other to say anything’s possible, especially with the crew currently running the ship.

    The dollar is another matter.  While it normally rises and falls in sync with interest rates, this relationship reversed at the end of 2017.    At that point, DXY logged another leg lower while TNX spiked. At just shy of 3%, the TNX became a drag on equities — the whole “going broke” thing [see: Why Rising Rates Are a Problem This Time.]  But, as the gyrations in equities picked up again, great care was taken to ensure it didn’t plunge in value.

    I suppose the thinking was that lower rates would weaken the dollar’s appeal.  Or, maybe it was just fear of a yield curve inversion.  In any case, TNX’s purple TL has refused to break down. DXY also refuses to break down.  And, this could go on for quite a while.  It needs to tag the bottom of the rising purple channel.  But, until mid-July rolls around, that would mean dipping below the .618 at 88.423.  So, it’s quite possible TPTB will prop it up for another three months! 

    Remember, Mnuchin publicly stated he wants to support the USD.  And, it goes without saying that he, like every central banker, loathes any serious price appreciation in gold, as it undermines the value of the mighty dollar. One silver lining, EURUSD suggests a shorter timeframe, say Jun 5.  But, even two months would be a long time to wait for another few points.  An escalation in MENA tensions could obviously accelerate things.  But, is it worth taking the risk for 10-15 points?  I think not.  I’d pull the plug or at least enter stops here at 1367.  If it pops above 1380, great.  No argument with going long, again.  DXY could drop to 87 tomorrow, and GC could easily reach 1377-1380 or higher.

    But, if DXY continues sideways, and unless war breaks out in the next day or two, it seems likely that gold’s next move will be lower.  The most obvious support is at the rising white channel bottom and SMA100, currently around 1315.2-1318.  If the channel breaks down again, the SMA200 will reach the purple channel line later this month, probably around 1300.  I’ll update things if we see a material deviation in either direction.

    GLTA.

     

     

  • US Dollar: Capitulation?

    When it comes to trade, there is no free lunch.  A lower US dollar helps US exporters.  But, for the US – a net importer by a huge margin – it raises the price of imports.

    So, it was really interesting to watch Treasury Secretary Mnuchin step in it explain that a lower USD would be “beneficial to our trade imbalances” without mentioning the offsetting, and more troubling, inflation and interest rate repercussions.

    If we didn’t have $21 trillion in debt (multiples of that off-book) in a rising interest rate environment, it probably wouldn’t matter.  But, the CBO’s numbers, which assume 10-yr rates top out just over 3% (half the historical average), argue otherwise.

    Mind you, I’m not complaining.  I’ve been bearish on the USD for a very long time.  In May 2017 [see: May 1 Update on US Dollar] we noted that DXY had broken below a long-term trend line and was susceptible to more downside.

    …if DXY drops through the SMA200 and the yellow TL, then we have some very obvious Fib targets including the .786 at 97.583, the .886 at 96.789 and the purple .618 where it intersects the purple channel midline at 96.465 in July or August.  If the purple midline breaks down, the next major support isn’t until 91 in early September and 87-88 as early as the end of the year.

    We’ve seen plenty of worrisome bumps along the way, with a couple of timely rallies in Q4 to support stocks.  But, our charts have remained bearish even as the Fed, with its ineffectual rate hikes, struggled to argue otherwise [see: Will the FOMC Minutes Save the Dollar?]

    DXY just tagged our 87-88 target, reaching 88.438 moments ago with its eye on the rising purple channel bottom around 87.423.As we discussed in yesterday’s updates on EURUSD and USDJPY, the big question is what now?  The charts offer a compelling answer.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Price Alert: Gold

    Gold is approaching our next upside target from two weeks ago [see: Gold – Following the Yellow Brick Road.]

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Gold: Following the Yellow Brick Road

    I’m not a gold bug.  I’ve always thought the price is pretty heavily manipulated (long before it hit the headlines) and I guess I’ve avoided it on principle.  Looking back at my forecasts over the past year or so, that was probably a mistake.

    Since our December 14, 2015 forecast, GC has gained about 19% — not shabby.  However, if one heeded the forecasts offered with each subsequent update, the net return would have been over 80%.

    I’ve said many times, lately, that forecasting stocks has become a lot tougher than forecasting the various drivers of stock prices.  In the case of gold, it is obviously affected by the value of the US dollar, which is an important component of USDJPY — a key driver of equity algos.

    Thus, GC — like USDJPY, WTI and VIX — is one of those things that’s been relatively easy to forecast even though I’ve devoted only the occasional hour or two to its study.  Before we touch on today’s forecast, let’s take a look at the past year’s periodic forecasts.The numbers in the above chart correspond to the posts below.

    1. Dec 14, 2015 (GC: 1060):
      “If DX plunges further, as I expect it will, GC’s 4th bounce could be a doozy: 1150-1180 for starters, and 1286 after that.”  GC reached 1180 by Feb 8, topped out at 1287.80 on Mar 11.
    2. Mar 4, 2016 (GC: 1280):
      “I’d be very cautious in chasing GC at this point…acts like it’s reversing between here and 1286…take the gains…it could easily backtest the .618 at 1207.60.”  GC reached 1286 the next week, then reversed to backtest 1206.
    3. April 8, 2016 (GC: 1240):
      “If [gold] breaks above the purple midline [at 1270] then 1379-1380 is the next logical target…”   Gold reached 1377.50 three months later.
    4. July 7, 2016 (GC: 1361):
      “Our target range from April 8 was 1379-1380.  Yesterday’s 1377.50 was probably close enough.  If it can’t make new highs today, the next stop is the neckline at 1307..”  GC, which peaked at 1377.50 on Jul 6, dropped 5% to 1310 over the next 2 weeks.
    5. Aug 26, 2016 (GC: 1324):
      “…[there’s a] huge IH&S Pattern, the neckline of which is the former high at 1307ish.  If TPTB are serious about discrediting GC anytime soon it’ll involve getting it back below that [1307] support.”  GC tumbled to 1307, testing it three times before breaking down to 1243 on Oct 7.
    6. Oct 7, 2016 (GC: 1254): “…GC tagged its SMA200 and the bottom of a pretty good looking channel earlier — usually good for a bounce.”  GC bottomed the next day at 1243, bounced for a month, reached 1339 on Nov 9.
    7. Nov 14, 2016 (GC: 1227): …GC’s channel finally broke down two days ago and has potential to 1083 — a 12% drop from here.  What better way to finish the year out?  GC plunged 103 (8.4%) over the next month.
    8. Dec 5, 2016 (GC: 1175): If the .618 [1172.40] breaks down, then the next support isn’t until the red TL at 1130, followed by the .886 at 1083.50… GC reached 1130 on Dec 15.
    9. Dec 15, 2016 (GC: 1129): “GC is currently testing an important internal TL of support… a potentially important test…that could produce a bounce to the purple midline [at 1230] or the SMA200 — currently at 1278.”  GC reached the SMA200 at 1264.60 on Feb 27.

    After tagging its 200-day average in February, gold tumbled about 67, back below a key channel midline.  But, it is right back in the swing of things, having nearly reached the SMA200 a second time just yesterday.

    With all the discussion about what the Fed will or won’t do for the rest of the year, what’s next?

    continued for members… (more…)