pebblewriter

Tag: oil

  • Coincidences and Consequences

    It’s interesting how Khashoggi’s murder top-ticked oil and gas prices…

    …and, so soon after Trump’s latest demand that OPEC lower oil prices.

    I’m certainly not insinuating that Trump had anything to do with Khashoggi’s murder.

    But, OPEC ignored Trump’s Sep 20 demand.  Two weeks later, oil prices had spiked 10% higher.  Since Oct 3, the day of the murder, WTI has fallen 14.5% and RBOB has fallen 16.7%.

    As Churchill famously said, “never let a good crisis go to waste.”

     *  *  *

    Sometimes it’s quite difficult to anticipate a major market move.  You’ve got hundreds of companies, all with their own earnings, outlooks, and market-moving headlines.  Then, there’s the economic news of the day, both domestic and foreign.  And, of course, there are geopolitical developments such as who’s dismembering or cozying up to whom?

    And, sometimes it’s not so difficult at all. It can be as simple as the VIX chart we’ve discussed all week.  From Time to Panic on Tuesday:

    Note that VIX need only break the purple TL [for SPX to bounce.] If VIX doesn’t break down, this should be the end of the line for this bounce.

    It didn’t bounce.  SPX plunged.  Next?

    Or it can be slightly more complex, but still fairly straightforward — such as is the case with oil and gas.

    As we all know, central bank support (low interest rates, among other accommodations) has been critical to stock prices since 2009.  Low interest rates, of course, rely on low inflation.  And, low inflation relies to a great extent on low oil and gas prices (more accurately, low MoM and YoY increases in those prices.

    From last April in Oil & Gas, Inflation and Interest Rates: A Delicate Balance or Goal Seeking?

    The complicating factor, of course, is that oil and gas prices took over the job of stimulating algos (chief among the 90% of all trading activity which is conducted by machines) to drive stocks higher.

    Most recently, oil, gas and SPX all bottomed on Feb 11, 2016 and oil and gas prices played an integral role in stimulating the subsequent rally.  The most important nudge was in December 2017, when oil and gas prices broke out of an already rising channel.

    To chartists, and to algos, this is a very bullish maneuver.  It also has the effect of driving inflation and interest rates higher. CPI rose from 2.11% in December 2017 to 2.95 in July 2018.  The 10Y rose from 2.31% in December to 3.24% just a few weeks ago.

    The Fed told us they were okay with this, that they were going to let the economy and inflation “run hot.”  I was among the many doubters, citing the damage that higher rates would inflict on our already alarming budget deficit, but darned if they didn’t do it anyway. I suppose that, at the end of the day, a temporary increase in the rate at which the debt and interest expense are expanding was less important than having a higher perch from which to crash rates during the next GFC.

    Stocks ignored the implications for a while, happy to play follow the leader with oil and gas prices.  The day that RBOB popped out of the rising purple channel was the day that SPX popped above its 2.24 Fibonacci extension at 2703 – a level which might otherwise have provided serious overhead resistance.  It can be seen as the horizontal, purple trend line on the chart below. In early February, though, RBOB’s breakout faltered.  No surprise, but SPX followed along, suffering its biggest and sharpest decline in years.  Like magic, RB quickly popped back above the purple channel top – rescuing SPX and helping it back above 2703.

    Note that SPX went on to new all-time highs in September, only after RB backtested the purple channel and bounced higher.

    And this lovely little correction we’re enjoying?  SPX topped the day that RB failed to break out of the falling yellow channel (also the day of Khashoggi’s murder.)  SPX fell through its 200-day moving average on the day that RB plunged back below the purple channel top.  And, SPX plunged below 2703 on the day that RB fell out of the falling yellow channel.

    With the elections less than two weeks away, I’m not expecting a sharp rebound in oil and gas prices any time soon.  So, the algos will have to rely on other tools — such as VIX, which has now shed 12.5% since tagged our 26 target yesterday.

    So far, VIX’s decline has produced a pretty nifty bounce.  Is it enough to offset weakness in oil and gas and a hawkish Fed which has been browbeaten by a “low-interest rate president?”

    continued for members... (more…)

  • Appearances

    Credit: REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

    It is often said that there are two sides to every story and, somewhere in middle, lies the price of oil.  Okay, I paraphrased that just a bit.

    But, isn’t it odd that the day after the Saudis threaten $400/barrel oil, Donald Trump suddenly embraces the ludicrous “rogue killers” theory for the death of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi?

    It appears that after days of vehement denials of any involvement, the Saudis suddenly remembered that Khashoggi was, in fact, assassinated and dismembered in their Turkish embassy (Saudi operative: “Oh, yeah…that guy that we chopped up with a bone saw?  I had forgotten all about that!)

    After a 20-minute conversation, the president who fell in love with Kim Jong-un also came to terms with Saudi King Salman.  Was it love?  To quote the master of the deal, himself, who knows?

    But since Trump is desperate to reverse the rise in gas prices, inflation, and interest rates between now and November 6 (and, to salvage billions in arms sales) don’t be surprised if we get that next leg down in oil prices very soon.  Nobody knew the economy could be so complicated!

    And, while we’re on the topic of government prevarication, the much-delayed September Treasury Statement was finally released yesterday.  Anyone notice something odd about September outlays?  Did we really see a plunge in every expense category?  Or, maybe, someone decided to massage the numbers just a bit to prevent the report of a $1 trillion deficit.  Appearances, again.

     

    Nah…then we’d surely see other efforts to obfuscate the country’s fiscal plight.  For instance, they’d never allow charts like this one from the August report.

    The same chart in September…  (appearances, indeed!)continued for members… (more…)

  • Quad-Witching: Sep 21, 2018

    We’re off to a quiet start so far, with futures up a few points in sympathy to rising oil and gas prices — both up over 1% — and, a bounce in the dollar index.

    OPEC is slated to meet over the weekend, and it’s not unusual to see oil rally in advance of a policy meeting.  It’s also not unusual to see the leader of the free world resort to Twitter to express his dissatisfaction with oil prices which are rising largely as the result of his own policies.

    Speaking of which, Walmart is the latest (and largest) retailer to warn of higher prices as the result of Trump’s proposed tariffs.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Crypto Carnage

    As the currency turmoil continues, it’s interesting to note that cryptocurrencies are having a worse go of it than EMs.

    Meanwhile, futures dipped enough overnight to finally backtest the SMA10.  They’ve since rebounded enough to backtest the broken red channel.  It remains to be seen whether SPX will join in and backtest its SMA10 and whether both can manage a backtest of their January highs.

    On the commodity front, RB finally tagged our next downside target — cratering 4.5% from yesterday’s highs.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • A Backtest or More?

    Today should shape up as a battle between holding a much-cherished round number (SPX 2900) and backtesting solid support (the January highs.)

    The futures are off about 5, with yesterday’s downside target of 2878.50-2881.95 still looking good — if SPX will relinquish 2900.

    Much will depend on the yen, which is strengthening in the midst of the EM turmoil…

    …and the 10Y, which has been in a holding pattern for months.  It looks ripe for a breakdown, but that would almost certainly invert the curve and usher in more than a backtest.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • How Not to Manipulate Stock Prices

    Sometimes you just can’t catch a break.  TSLA shares rose from 22 in 2012 to 387 in 2017 — helping drive Musk’s net worth to well over $20 billion.  But, the shares have since formed a triple top, failing to top 390 and coming perilously close to breaking down.

    This isn’t the first time Musk has faced such a challenge.  The stock spent three years trying to crack 290 – the red trend line below.

    We’ve documented past interventions — which have, by and large, been successful.  Musk’s well-publicized $25 million open market purchase (the white arrow) on June 12-13, for instance, saw the stock gap past the .618 Fib level and a trend line connecting recent highs.

    It was a nice gesture and helped divert attention from the mass layoffs announced the day before.  But, it didn’t take long for investors to realize that while $25 million is a lot of money to most people, it represented only 1% of Musk’s net worth.  And, it increased his holdings of the common stock by a pittance (0.2%.)

    It’s pretty obvious why Musk did it.  After breaking above 290 in April 2017, the stock had fallen back below it in March 2018.  The 200-DMA, rising white channel, and purple trend line all broke down in the process.

    After a miraculous, tweet-aided recovery, Musk got the stock back above the red trend line.  But, he needed it above 390.  It was not meant to be.  Too many missteps, too many worrisome headlines.  The best it could manage was a backtest of the broken white channel and the .886 retracement of its drop from 389 to 244.

    The stock slipped back below the red TL and 200-DMA, eventually bouncing off 290 yet again in late-July on news of a major new factory to be built in Europe.  The company’s earnings call a few days later featured a well-behaved Musk, a revenue (obviously not income) beat, and a promise not to float additional additional shares.

    Musk: We do not — we will not be raising any equity at any point, at least that’s — I have no expectation of doing so, do not plan to do so … And we certainly could raise money, but I think we don’t need to and we — yeah, I think, it’s better to — it is better discipline not to.

    Again, the stock gapped higher — back above the 200-DMA and the yellow trend line.  But, the naysayers weren’t having any of it.

    Despite having produced the promised number of Model 3’s, the company was dogged by reports of quality issues and was losing money on every sale — even though these were the higher end models with potentially larger profit margins.

    This was apparently the point when desperation set in.  As we discussed at the time [see: Is the Pressure Getting to Elon Musk?] it was fairly obvious to any competent chartist that Musk’s going-private tweet — like all the others — was designed to get the stock over the latest hump.

    It didn’t take long for Tesla watchers to question the deal.  The financing was supposedly secured, but no one stepped forward.  The board seemed genuinely alarmed.  Shorts launched lawsuits.  And, the SEC announced an inquiry.

    The latest rally ran out of steam at 387 – just shy of the September 2017 highs.  The stock tumbled back to the red trend line yet again.  It bounced, but that was before Friday night’s (11pm Friday night, following Thursday’s decision) admission that the going-private transaction was dead in the water.  As of this morning, the stock is heading back toward 290.

    Despite my cynicism, I’m rooting for Elon and Tesla.  We obviously need alternatives to carbon-based transportation for many reasons.  But, the stock is at these lofty levels based on the (aging) premise that it’ll soon be self-funding and turn a profit.

    The shorts are right to question this premise.  But, anyone who shorts at these levels, before the stock breaks down below the tangle of support at 290ish is ignoring the obvious — this is a CEO who will do whatever it takes to prop up his stock.

    TSLA might ultimately come crashing down.  But, I would absolutely wait until the purple trend line and horizontal support break down before jumping on board.

    Now, on to the rest of the market.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Currency Complications

    USDJPY reached our target at the SMA100/SMA200 overnight, at least temporarily bringing the pair back below the top of the falling white channel from which it broke out on July 10.  Readers will recall that breakout was instrumental in helping SPX break above its faux IH&S neckline 66 points ago.

    A USDJPY rebound here is all stocks might need to make new highs.  EURUSD, which is backtesting after a major channel breakdown, would certainly support a strengthening of the USD……as would DXY — which is the latest victim of “unpresidented” tweets.

    As central bankers have recently discovered, however, there are complications from continued dollar strength which would suggest that it will take a break here.  Will they heed those warnings, or are new all-time highs in equity markets more important?

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Charts I’m Watching: Aug 20, 2018

    Futures are hanging on to a 4-pt gain, primarily on a continuing decline in VIX.  With Jackson Hole coming up, we could see more volatility — particularly if Fed speakers back off their hiking schedule.

    Speaking of backing off…TSLA is back down to its horizontal and trend line support.  As readers will recall, this is a critical line in the sand.As we concluded last May [see: Can TSLA Avoid a Crash?] a drop through this key level could easily land the stock below 200.  Our chart from back then, before the craziness really got going…

    Apparently JPM has also adopted this view.  And, an increasing number of observers are coming to the same conclusion we did a couple of weeks ago regarding Musk’s emotional state [see: Is the Pressure Getting to Elon Musk?]

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Art of Hat Holding

    One nice thing about patterns is that they give you something to hang your hat on.  When we drew the Inverted Head & Shoulders Pattern on Jul 3 [see: Holiday Headfake] there was nothing in the news to suggest a 100-pt rally in the ensuing week.

    Yet, SPX and ES landed within a point or two or their IH&S targets yesterday all the same.  Likewise, all the news was rosy yesterday — incessant talk of renewed buyout fever and imminent, glowing earnings reports.Yet, completion of the pattern, combined with a channel midline, put a pause on the rally right where expected.  With its SMA200 now a mere 30 points below its 2.24 extension, SPX can backtest any time it likes with plenty of support around 2700.

    In fact, if ES is able to hold the (formerly broken) channel into which it reinserted itself, the damage would be limited to 20-30 points.

    One key: VIX.  So far, it has put the brakes on at a backtest of the recently broken straw-man trend line.  If it can remain below the red TL and the SMA200, and USDJPY keeps ramping, stocks will suffer a mild pullback.  If the coming drops in oil and gas get going, then SPX will do well to hold 2750 and, depending on the PPI/CPI numbers due out today and tomorrow, could test 2700 again.

    If we should dip below the SMA200 and 2.24 extension again, then it’s time to hold on to your hat.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • CPI: The Games Continue

    Everyone who drives knows that gas prices increased more than 3% month-over-month  – the official, seasonally adjusted numbers from the BLS in this morning’s CPI report.  Data put together by non-governmental sources confirms it.But, folks like GasBuddy and AAA aren’t responsible for cost of living adjustments for millions of Americans.  So, unlike the BLS, they have no incentive to fudge the numbers. Maybe they’re also aware that gas stations don’t allow customers to pay the “seasonally-adjusted” price.

    Using the EIA’s (also fudged) numbers, gas prices were up 6.2% for April — more than twice BLS’ goal-seeking 3%.  So, the BLS was able to report 0.2% instead of the 0.3% expected for April CPI.Similar games are played, of course, with respect to shelter (+3.4% YoY,) medical care (+2.2%) and vehicles (-1.6% new, -0.9% used.) I’ll pick on vehicle data this morning, as it illustrates another shortcoming of the BLS approach.

    Consumers buy food and gas every few days, while they tend to hold on to vehicles for several years at a time.  Even if vehicle prices were to drop, that savings wouldn’t flow through to a consumer until they purchase a vehicle.  When they did, of course, they’d be hit with higher interest rates than were in place last month or last year.

    The algos don’t care much about the veracity of the numbers.  Futures are up 8 points ahead of the open — another overnight VIX bashing that has it below the SMA200 and about to test the .886 Fib and channel midline at 13.23ish.  While it’s nice to nail a forecast, it’s distressing to see how easily the algos can be manipulated. The flip side of under-reporting inflation, of course, is the effect it has on currencies and interest rates. With “no” inflation pressure, interest rates have receded from 3% — sapping some of the dollar’s strength. continued for members… (more…)