Posts

  • Breaking It Down

    We’ve been bearish on oil for ages, shorting back in October 2018 and playing most of the bounces and downdrafts along the way. So, we weren’t terribly surprised when May WTI futures dropped to zero, having suggested that very possibility when CL was testing its channel bottom just last week.

    A drop through 19.27 would be reason enough to revert to short with 17.12 and 10.65 the only support between here and zero.

    The drop to -40, however, was pretty shocking. The other huge surprise is that the Fed didn’t step in and “fix” things.

    Futures held up remarkably well under the circumstances, though we’re seeing more fallout this morning, with ES currently off about 2%.This sets up an important test for ES and potentially SPX – the 2.24 Fibonacci extensions at ES 2728 and SPX 2703. More importantly, it could quite possibly trigger widespread selling as the 10-day moving averages (SPX 2775.12) and channel bottoms are breached – the two we identified as potential sell signals two weeks ago:

    As we discussed last week, SPX’s SMA10 has crossed above its SMA20 – a bullish cross… For those inclined to follow the Fed’s lead, the safe strategy is to keep your stops reasonably close and to watch out for a drop back through the SMA10 and/or channel bottom. Either one is a signal for traders to sell and for buy-and-hold types to rein in risk.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Crude Carnage

    May WTI futures are off almost 35% since Friday’s close.  This drops it below the 17.12 target we first identified in March 2019 when, at 59.32, CL had completed a rising wedge and tagged multiple channel lines.

    Members might recall the 17.12 target was originally set for April 2023 in keeping with a March 2019 cycle study [see: Macro Factor Cycles and Regime Shifts.] The chart patterns and Fib levels fit nicely with the concept of a recurring 2600-day cycle for significant lows.We’ve reiterated the 17.12 target many times, including last December as CL finished on a high note after plunging 45% in the wake of Jamal Khashoggi’s Oct 2018 murder (when the US achieved maximum leverage over the Saudis – see: Coincidences and Consequences.) The last significant bounce accommodated both the Aramco IPO and the year-end equity ramp.

    Oil has been a favorite tool of not only the Saudis but also central bankers and politicians.  In fact, understanding the relationship between oil/gas and inflation, interest rates and equity valuations has made it possible to accurately forecast most of its major moves over the years.

    At times, this has meant ignoring the frequently misleading supply/demand data, OPEC deliberations, and presidential tweets and focusing instead on where central bankers needed oil/gas to go in order to achieve a particular inflation and interest rate goals.

    As interest rates rose over the past few years, for instance, it became obvious that inflation would need to moderate to relieve the building budgetary pressure.

    One major theme on which we’ve focused since calling the top on interest rates in October 2018 [see: Suddenly Interest Rates Matter] has been the relationship between CPI and the YoY delta in gas prices. By “managing” the price of RBOB, CPI and, thus, interest rates could be managed higher or lower as needed.This was a very reliable theme for most of 2018, 2019, and early 2020 – when the focus shifted to oil’s strong correlation to stock prices.

    Oil has long been a major factor in triggering algos to bid up stocks. So, when oil’s major channel from 2016 broke down in February, we knew stocks were in deep trouble.

    With CL dropping through its 2001 lows and approaching its 1998 lows, what might we expect from oil and what are the implications for stocks? As we discussed last week:

    A drop through 19.27 would be reason enough to revert to short with 17.12 and 10.65 the only support between here and zero.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Hope Springs Eternal

    On “news” of a potentially beneficial therapeutic and the promise of reopening parts of the economy in the days ahead, the S&P futures have shot up above the 50-day moving average. We shouldn’t be surprised.

    This, in fact, has been the way this recovery has worked from the very beginning. Every single moving average has been topped via a gap higher on something or another, with the biggest gap higher accomplishing the 10/20 cross on April 6.

    It’s a gambit which has worked beautifully so far. While pundits debate which letter of the alphabet this rebound will most resemble, SPX has regained its 50% retracement in 13 sessions versus the 17 it took during the V-shaped recovery in Dec 2018-Jan 2019 – when the world wasn’t gripped by a pandemic and a stunning drop in GDP.

    Unfortunately, that is our lot. And, as the futures start to slip coming up on the open, the gap higher method is going to fall a little short.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Futures Rally on Abysmal Economic Data

    So far, the futures are ignoring another round of abysmal economic data:

    Instead of plunging, ES is up nearly 20 points as the algos are more concerned with VIX’s breakdown.Nothing new here, of course…but can it last past the open?  Not if yesterday’s close by DJIA and COMP are any indication.  The Dow passed up an opportunity to break out above its 2.24 extension……and COMP pulled back and closed below its SMA200. Not exactly the behavior of a market intent on higher highs…  Meanwhile, global COVID-19 cases reached 2mm yesterday – up from 1mm on April 2.  The US now accounts for over 30% of all cases and moved up from 44th to 43rd in testing per capital in the world.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Art of the Deal

    I’m guessing this isn’t the result President Trump was hoping for when arm-twisting (or was it horse trading?) Russia and Saudi Arabia into the “beautiful deal” he continues to tout.

    Apparently, he forgot to convince pretty much every analyst and trader out there that a 10 million bpd cut could offset the 25 million bpd in excess production.Not even the algos are buying the line that this stinker will stabilize prices. Even before this morning’s abysmal Retail Sales and Empire Manufacturing data, futures were off a bundle. Thanks to yesterday’s nonsensical ramp, however, the drop was from a much higher level and the latest H&S Pattern was busted. Cue the talk about opening the country on May 1.

    continued for members(more…)

  • A Broken Record

    We’ve seen another overnight meltup – the 7th in a row… …as VIX continues to be hammered in the after-hours……more than offsetting the losses in oil, which was kind enough to wait until after the close to break trend……and the ongoing leakage in USDJPY.

    This means another busted H&S Pattern – the 4th in the past week – and higher highs in SPX and ES. The bigger themes continue to be a yield curve completely under Fed control and ceaseless pronouncements of “reopening” the country, which boil down to how many deaths are acceptable.

    None of that will be reflected in the daily market data, which will simply reflect a continuing rally in the face of the worst economic outlook since the Great Depression.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Oil “Market”

    If you blinked, you might have missed oil’s correction off Friday’s highs. The much vaunted deal between Russia and Saudi Arabia was a flop. As we’ve maintained for the past several weeks:

    …supply now exceeds demand by at least 25 million bpd. So, even the 10-15 million cut suggested by Trump would do nothing to erase the massive oversupply but would merely slow the rate at which the excess is building.

    This doesn’t mean, however, that oil prices won’t continue to be manipulated.  For years, we’ve seen nonsensical moves which defy most predictions based on supply and demand. This one is no different.

    Otherwise, you’d never expect to see CL bounce precisely at the bottom of a channel from its Mar 30 lows.Could it be related to Trump’s tweet (right as the market opened) that the 10mm bpd cut OPEC already announced was supposed to be 20mm?

    From OPEC’s press release on Friday:

    In view of the current fundamentals and the consensus market perspectives, the Participating Countries agreed to…adjust downwards their overall crude oil production by 10.0 mb/d, starting on 1 May 2020, for an initial period of two months that concludes on 30 June 2020.

    Following the two month reduction (from inflated levels, mind you) the amount of the cut actually declines to 8mm bpd for the remainder of the year, then to 6mm bpd for the next 16 months.  Even at 20mm, there is still as much as 15mm bpd too much oil being produced every single day. Trump’s tweet just doesn’t reflect reality…”to put it mildly.”

    As we watch stock futures ramp higher into the open for the sixth session in a row, is it any wonder that oil is as manipulated as it is?

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Big Picture: Apr 9, 2020

    Where did March go?  If you’re anything like me, it was a blur.  I was in the process of recovering from knee replacement surgery when the crash began [being under the influence of some very strong pain killers was probably the best way to weather the storm.]

    On February 3, the day before I went under the knife, I pulled together a forecast on everything I chart: stocks, bonds, currency pairs, commodities, etc.  I try to update the Current Forecast page at least every month. But, between the pain and the global pandemic which threatened to trap my daughter in Rome, I was a little preoccupied.

    I had been fairly bearish when penning that Feb 3 forecast and was still lucid enough in the following weeks to warn of the coming storm, writing on Feb 18 in When Will News Begin to Matter Again

    …be very careful in chasing this breakout. It is built on a very weak algo-driven foundation which, given the coming moves in CL, DXY, USDJPY and TNX, cannot stand. When it cracks, it could be quite violent.

    …and, again on Feb 20 in Buckle Up:

    …the major downside support levels such as the yellow 2.618 at 3047 – which was never backtested – and 2.24 at 2703 will soon disappear from the path of the existing rising channels… All I know is that when important support breaks down, it’s time to short – especially when the usual central bank tricks aren’t working.

    As it turned out, Feb 20 was the all-time high. A month later, SPX had fallen further and faster than ever before. Needless to say, the targets mentioned in the forecast were reached and exceeded in almost every case – more than reversing the excesses of the breakout above SPX 3047.

    My favorite downside targets over the past six months have been ES 2155 and SPX 2138.  ES came close, dropping within 19 points of its target on Mar 23 before all hell broke loose.

    The Fed began an extraordinary response which was expanded again by $2.3 trillion at 8:30:01 this morning.  Not coincidentally, it was announced seconds after jobless claims of 6.6 million (also not coincidentally, which tied the worst ever prior continuing claims number) were announced.

    Futures responded as planned — taking us another step past the line where price discovery used to be. The Fed might as well have named it the Prop Up the Market Program, as it lends new import to the expression “don’t fight the Fed.”

    Oh, and just in case the market doesn’t understand the Fed’s intentions, Jerome Powell will give another presser at 10AM.

    Just for fun, here’s a quick peek at where things stood on February 3…

    Short RB:  2/3/20 – Shorted near target on 4/24, back to long on 6/5, shorted again at backtest targets on 7/11 and back to long on 9/5. Back to short on 9/16 and back to long on 10/3. Shorted on 11/4 with tight stops, target of 1.35. Broke down on 11/19, but buy triggered on 11/20. Back to short on 11/22, long on Dec 4 and short on Dec 27.  Targets are 1.44, 1.41 and 1.349.

    Short CL:  2/3/20 – Shorted near target on 4/24, back to long at target on 6/5, shorted at backtest target on 7/11, breakouts on 9/16 and .886 target on Jan 8. Targets delayed by Aramco IPO in Dec and Al Asad spike in January.  54.55 target reached on Jan 24, breakdown yielded targets of 51.62 (reached Jan 31), 49.46, 47.55 and 46.

    Neutral DXY:  2/3/20 – We were long from 88.253 on Feb 16, 2018.  Came close enough to our 97.873 target on Nov 12 and again on Dec 14 where we shorted at 97.  Multiple breakdowns have bounced back, leaving DXY in trading range between 97-99 since Aug 2019. Essentially jerking algos around with signalling rises and dips. Don’t see it as a viable trading vehicle until at least March 2020, when inflation pressures should ease and make a decline possible.

    Short USDJPY: 2/3/20 – Has been consolidating since June 2016, making lower highs and lows in the 104.74 area.  Highs have followed a falling channel top, with the latest tag of our upside target on Jan 17. Since then, USDJPY has accommodated stocks’ weakness, with even lower downside targets of 107.94 and 107.64.a 107.64.  The range remains tight (only 3 points, 107-110ish) so – like DXY – it has offered very modest trading opportunities.

    Short EURUSD: 2/3/20 – Has been in a gently falling channel since July 2018, seems destined to remain in it for the foreseeable future. Recently backtested the latest rising corrective channel it broke down from. A nice drop to 1.0592 is possible, but the ECB is being careful to avoid big drops. Next downside target is 1.0813.

    Short SPX/ES: 2/3/20 – formed an inverted H&S Pattern from Jan 2018, breaking out in Oct 2019 and racing higher in an acceleration channel to 1.618 Fib at SPX 3306.51/ ES 3336.49, at which point we started looking for a backtest of the acceleration channel/SMA50 around 3200 and, if that fails, the IH&S around SPX 3100. Major support below that include SPX’s 2.618 at 3047 and the 2.24 at 2703. If SPX should break out of its current correction, the IH&S targets 3673.

    Long Gold:  2/3/20 – went back to long on rise through yellow TL at 1195 in August 2018. Completed IH&S, reaching 1370 target (again) in June 2019, then channel top in Aug 2019 and again on Jan 8, 2020. Backtested rising channel midline target on Nov 12, 2019 and back to red channel top where it is threatening a breakout. If it doesn’t, it has downside risk to 1490ish, 1424 and 1380. If it does, upside targets include IH&S target at 1308 and .786 Fib at 1735.70.

    Long VIX:  2/3/20 – Went long in Jan 2020 after survived test of TL from Nov 2017. Has run into resistance at successively lower points on a falling TL from Aug 5, finally breaking out on Jan 27, 2020. Upside targets now include the TL from Dec 24, 2018, favoring 23.38.  A breakout above it would open up 25.50 and 33.33.

    Short COMP: 2/3/20 – Spent Apr 2 through Oct 25, 2019 trying to break out of falling channels and make new highs. Oct Oct 25 2019, finally broke out for good, testing 1.618 at 9334.14 on Jan 16, 2020. Anything below 9334 opens the door to 8953, 8661 and potentially 8133. But, stops are warranted as COMP has ignored reality time and time again.

    Long Bonds: 2/3/20 – ZN reached our downside target of 117’135 on Oct 8, 2018, has since bounced to our successively higher targets, reaching the .886 at 132’100 on Sep 3, 2019.  Almost backtested the SMA200 on Dec 19, has since broken out, back to near its Sep high. Targeting 133’070, followed by 134’075 and 135’155.

    Shorted TNX in Oct 2018 and have seen it tag successively lower targets until reaching 15.54 on Aug 15, 2019.  Long, drawn out series of bounces until Jan 21, 2020 when it broke down again. Reached 1.636 target on Jan 27, 15.54 on Jan 30 and is approaching 14.91 target. If it breaks lower, targets include 14.46 and 14.29. Longer-term, see the 10Y reaching 8.16 around May 2020 and approaching 0.0 in Jun-October 2020.

    We’ll continue with a roundup of where we are two months later.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Update on Gold: Apr 8, 2020

    In our last formal update on gold in January [see: Jan 2 Update on Gold] with GC trading at 1529, I noted that although DXY had held up well, gold should benefit from loose Fed policy – but could see a backtest of its SMA200 based on the oil/gas meltdown we expected.

    I am partial, though, to the Fed putting the damper on inflation in January (reported in Feb) and setting up a backtest of the SMA200 or even the neckline which would set up another leg up to 1710-1735 in Oct 2021 or Jan 2022. Note that this would tie in nicely with the idea of an oil/gas meltdown in 2023.

    We certainly got all those things, but the timing was just a tad off.

    Long time members will remember I’ve been writing about gold’s potential Inverted Head & Shoulders Pattern for years. This post from September 2017 comes to mind.

    As I stated in that last update, I think TPTB will do whatever it takes to keep that giant IH&S targeting 1721 from playing out. The only thing I can see outweighing their efforts would be a true black swan event such as open warfare on the Korean Peninsula.

    Sure enough, every time GC got close to that neckline (the dashed yellow line above), it was smacked down by as much as 18%. It has happened 9 times since July 2016.  It was nice for trading purposes, but frustrating to the many gold bugs out there.

    While rising oil and gas prices were helpful to Aramco’s share offering in 2019, they disrupted the delicate balance between inflation and interest rates and sent a clear signal that it was finally time for GC to break out — which it finally did last June.

    Since then, it’s been a matter of waiting for the rising price channel to reach our upside targets. It might have been a long wait if not for the coronavirus. We managed to avoid war with North Korea, but this smaller, deadlier enemy was plenty Black Swan enough for the Fed.

    A few trillion in QE later, GC has reached our 1735 target — well ahead of schedule and after a very dramatic SMA200 backtest.

    Is the run over, or is there more to come?

    continued for members(more…)

  • A Stall, or More?

    A few days ago, we looked at the outsized influence of oil on algorithms.  It’s one of the big three: oil, VIX and USDJPY. This morning, it’s USDJPY’s turn.

    Futures, which were down 17 points late last night, are suddenly up 35 points as we approach the opening bell. It happened in the absence of any particular news and without any particular support level having been reached. It was just USDJPY which, on its way to backtest its SMA200, made a sudden reversal well short of it and went up to test the same overhead TL which has stopped it multiple times since Monday. This time, though, as futures were having a hard time exceeding the overnight highs, it popped through that TL – a breakout that the algos couldn’t ignore.Will it be enough to outweigh yesterday’s disappointing reversal of fortune precipitated by oil’s sudden fall from grace?

    Meanwhile, the “slowdown” in COVID-19 cases and deaths in the US took a turn for the worse yesterday…

     

    … as new evidence emerges of the administration’s failure to heed pandemic warnings from Peter Navarro from as early as January 29 even as President Trump and key administration officials were downplaying the risk. Copies of the full memos can be found here.

    January 29 memo to the National Security Council, chaired by President Trump:

    The February 23 memo addressed directly to the President:

    ABC reports that US Intelligence officials’ warnings about the virus were first aired in November 2019 and began appearing in the President’s daily briefings in early January.

    I suspect this won’t play well in Peoria.

    continued for members(more…)