Year: 2021

  • PPI Confirms Hot Inflation

    It comes as no surprise that PPI confirmed yesterday’s hot CPI print, coming in at a whopping 6.2%.

    We’ve been beating the inflation drum for so long, it feels a bit anticlimactic to acknowledge that it’s finally here and even slightly greater than we anticipated.

    As regular readers well know, I expected central bankers to preemptively head off the problem of higher inflation and higher interest rates by crashing oil/gas prices as they have many times before.

    I was surprised to see them pass on this approach and roll the dice with inflation. But, it made more sense once it became apparent that they had essentially taken control of the bond market – the one market that had always “told the truth” about economic conditions. No more.

    As strong as yesterday’s equity selloff was, the 10Y barely budged, rising from a high on Tuesday of 1.63% to a high on Wednesday (after CPI was announced) of 1.69%. Today, yields are actually dropping.  An orderly channel like the one below is all you need to confirm that yields are being carefully managed.

     *   *   *

    Speaking of carefully managing things…I can only imagine the panic around the Fed, the Treasury and the White House when the Colonial Pipeline fiasco popped up the other day. Higher oil/gas prices had helped get stocks to their recent highs, but it was time for the market’s caretakers to take their feet off the gas lest inflation be even more alarming.

    A shutdown of the nation’s largest fuel pipeline certainly wasn’t part of the plan – though I wouldn’t be surprised if the hackers had placed some well-timed bets on oil/gas prices in advance. With markets going crazy over inflation, something had to give.

    I had the following conversation on this very topic with a very good friend who happens to be both brilliant and an excellent trader. But, he’s nowhere near as cynical as I am. We chatted just after the close.

    Less than ten minutes later…

    RBOB futures are off nearly 6% from Friday’s highs.

     *   *   *

    With futures having already dipped below the SMA50 to tag a key target earlier this morning, the bounce should continue given the algo action focused on VIX.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Blowout Inflation is Here

    April CPI came in at 4.2%, a rate not seen since August 2008.

    CPI has topped 4.2% only twelve months in the past 30 years, with the bulk of those instances during Jan-Sep 2008 when CPI pushed above 10Y yields.

    The Fed has managed (so far) to keep a lid on yields, providing additional evidence that the bond market remains broken and is no longer a valid source of price discovery.The details indicate the actual number should be higher, even by the BLS’ deceptive standards.  Gasoline, for instance, is listed as having experienced a 49.6% YoY increase…

    …though the actual increase was 62%. Rent has risen 10%, well above the shelter increase of 2.1% cited by the BLS.

    The rise in both CPI and gas prices continued the high positive correlation seen over the past several years.

    The effect on equities has also been muted so far. As with bonds, it has nothing to do with markets “shrugging off” data.

    The bond market’s supposed reaction to the most significant economic data of the past 15 months.

    Cue the Fed doves, who will continue to insist that rapidly rising prices are a good thing. Wouldn’t it be nice if, just once, the MSM would ask them to explain how spiking food, gas, rent and used car prices will benefit the average American – you know, the ones they claim to care so much about?

    By now, it should be obvious that the billlions being thrown at markets is intended to prop up stocks and keep interest rates from breaking out. Remember…when the 10Y broke above and then failed to hold the red TL in Sep 2018, SPX promptly began a 20% correction.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Fed is Playing With Fire

    From the Wall Street Journal, an opinion piece from Christian Broda and Stanley Druckenmiller of Duquesne Family Office, LLC that echoes everything we’ve been writing for the past year. They call it “playing with fire” while I’ve termed it “rolling the dice.” Either way, the Fed/Treasury have created a very dangerous trap from which there is no easy exit.

       *  *  *

    The Fed Is Playing With Fire

    Clinging to an emergency policy after the emergency has passed, Chairman Powell courts asset bubbles.

    With Covid uncertainty receding fast, and several quarters deep into the strongest recovery from any postwar recession, the Federal Reserve’s guidance continues to be the most accommodative on record, by a mile. Keeping emergency settings after the emergency has passed carries bigger risks for the Fed than missing its inflation target by a few decimal points. It’s time for a change.

    The American economy is back to prerecession levels of gross domestic product and the unemployment rate has recovered 70% of the initial pandemic hit in only six months, four times as fast as in a typical recession. Normally at this stage of a recovery, the Fed would be planning its first rate hike. This time the Fed is telling markets that the first hike will happen in 32 months, 2½ years later than normal. In addition, the Fed continues to buy $40 billion a month in mortgages even as housing is clearly running out of supply. And the central bank still isn’t even thinking about ending $120 billion a month of bond purchases.

    Not only is the recovery happening at record speed, excesses of fiscal policy are already visible. Consumers are spending like never before, construction is booming, and labor shortages are ubiquitous, thanks to direct government transfers. Two-thirds of all relief checks were sent after the vaccines were proved effective and the recovery was accelerating. Opportunistic politicians didn’t let the pandemic go to waste. Especially after the Trump years, Congress has decided to satisfy its long list of unmet desires.

    Isn’t the Fed’s independence supposed to act as a counterbalance to these political whims? The emergency conditions are behind us. Inflation is already at historical averages. Serious economists soundly rejected price controls 40 years ago. Yet the Fed regularly distorts the most important price of all—long-term interest rates. This behavior is risky, for both the economy at large and the Fed itself.

    Future fiscal burdens will put the kind of political pressure on the central bank that hasn’t been seen in decades. The federal government has added 30% of GDP in extra fiscal deficits in only two years, right as the baby-boomer retirement wave is beginning to accelerate. The Congressional Budget Office projects that in 20 years almost 30% of all yearly fiscal revenues will have to be used solely to pay back interests on government debt, up from a current level of 8%. More taxes simply won’t be enough to bridge the gap, so pressures to monetize the deficit will inevitably rise over the years. The Fed should be adapting policy today to minimize these risks.

    The risks are no longer hypothetical. For decades Treasurys have been the preferred asset for foreigners looking to hedge global portfolios. It was therefore shocking and unprecedented that in the midst of last year’s stock-market meltdown and while the Cares Act was being debated, foreigners aggressively sold Treasurys. This was dismissed by the Fed as a problem in the plumbing of financial markets. Even after trillions spent to prop up the bond market, foreigners have continued to be net sellers. The Fed chooses to interpret this troubling sign as the result of technicalities rather than doubts about the soundness of current and past policies.

    America’s deep divisions also make the central bank’s independence crucial. Fighting inequality and climate change are very far from the Fed’s central mission. There’s a reason central bankers are supposed to be unpopular. Inflation is often the result of a fragmented society that feels unrepresented by weak political leadership. Eventually, the choice between fiscal discipline—lower taxes or higher spending—and forcing the central bank’s hand becomes an easy one for politicians to make.

    With these risks in mind, and with unambiguous evidence of a strong recovery, the Fed should be doing more than just reanchoring inflation expectations to a slightly higher level. Fed policy has enabled financial-market excesses. Today’s high stock-market valuations, the crypto craze, and the frenzy over special-purpose acquisition companies, or SPACs, are just a few examples of the response to the Fed’s aggressive policies. The central bank should balance rather than fuel asset prices. The pernicious deflationary episodes of the past century started not because inflation was too close to zero but because of the popping of asset bubbles.

    With its narrow focus on inflation expectations, the Fed seems to be fighting the last battle. Just because the Fed hasn’t faced big trade-offs in recent decades doesn’t mean trade-offs aren’t coming or that they no longer exist. Chairman Jerome Powell needs to recognize the likelihood of future political pressures on the Fed and stop enabling fiscal and market excesses. The long-term risks from asset bubbles and fiscal dominance dwarf the short-term risk of putting the brakes on a booming economy in 2022.

    Mr. Broda is a partner at Duquesne Family Office LLC, where Mr. Druckenmiller is chairman and CEO.

      *  *  *

    We began pointing out the coming inflation problem over a year ago, when it was only an oil and gas phenomenon. Since oil and gas are integral to so many other industries – agriculture, transportation, manufacturing, etc. – the inflation problem has evolved from a triple backflip to one involving 3 1/2 twists. The Fed insists it is transitory, meaning it will pass relatively quickly and without incident.

    This is wishful thinking at best and, more accurately, a false narrative geared to keeping bond yields in check and equity markets on the rise.  CPI data is due out tomorrow will be the first aha moment for many investors.

    Futures continued tumbling this morning, giving up all of the Bostic gains and more. While I might differ with Mr. Druckenmiller regarding the “market’s” response to the coming turmoil, I agree wholeheartedly with the fact that there will be turmoil. At this point, it is unavoidable.

    continued for members

    (more…)

  • Three Choices

    Fed President Evans is the latest to double down on the “transitory” depiction of the mounting inflation problem facing the economy. CPI comes out Wednesday, and the Fed has three choices.  Either “adjust” the data to the point where it’s not alarming; leave the alarming data alone, but jump in and save the markets; or, leave the data alone, but let the markets do what they may.For the past several weeks, we’ve seen constant support in the markets – with the latest maneuver being yet another “breakdown” in VIX… …sending futures up to a new all-time high. This marks the second H&S Pattern to be busted in the past month and the third in the last two months. When it comes to saving markets, the Fed really can’t seem to help themselves.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Biggest Jobs Disappointment in Over 20 Years

    Blockbuster jobs data? Not so much. At 266K versus over 1MM consensus, it was the worst miss since 1998.

    The futures initially held the overnight ramp, taking their cues from VIX, which barely budged on the hugely disappointing print. But, VIX also hasn’t (yet) broken down the way it normally would if a full-court press were on to preserve the rally – the kind we saw yesterday when Atlanta Fed President Bostic served up new all-time highs on Dow by insisting that tapering mustn’t even be discussed (lest Death Eaters be summoned!?)

    continued for members(more…)

  • Charts I’m Watching: May 6, 2021

    Futures are flat after tumbling to and holding our backtest target yesterday morning. But, pay no attention to stocks just yet. They should continue to be under pressure, with the real action in oil and gas.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Yellen Goofs, Tells the Truth

    Two quotes by Janet Yellen, only hours apart.  The first clearly emphasizes the very real risk of rapidly rising inflation…

    “It may be that interest rates will have to rise somewhat to make sure that our economy doesn’t overheat, even though the additional spending is relatively small relative to the size of the economy.”

    …while the other clearly walks back the earlier assertion.

    “I don’t think there’s going to be an inflationary problem. But if there is, the Fed will be counted on to address them.”

    The reason for the second comment, of course, was the market’s reaction to the first – a tantrum, if you will.

    Most of us remember when, in 2013, Bernanke spooked the markets with talk of a rollback in bond purchases. Yellen did the same thing a few years later as Fed chair. This one is slightly different, as it highlights the facts which, by now, should be clear to everyone: inflation is a very real danger to the economy and the markets.

    Yellen’s retraction won’t change that.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Big Picture: May 4, 2021

    In a presentation to the CFA Society in July 2019, I showed the following chart which seemed to capture the Fibonacci and channel picture quite well. SPX was nearing the top of a large channel dating back to 1986 as well as the 2.618 Fibonacci extension of its 2007-2009 crash. It was an excellent setup for a correction.

    SPX had reacted at the top of the channel three times in the past two years: an 11.8% drop in Jan-Feb 2018, a 20.2% plunge in Sep-Dec 2018, and a 6.8% slide in Jul-Aug 2019. None of the corrections bounced at traditional support, and all rebounded to slightly higher highs within 3-7 months.

    It made sense, therefore, that SPX would react more significantly upon finally reached the 2.618 extention at 3047.23. The most logical target after reversing would be the next lower fib level at 2703.62 and, if that failed, the 1.618 at 2138.04 (it was never properly backtested.)

    If 2138 failed, then the charts suggested the possibility of a backtest of the October 2007 highs at 1576 when the yellow channel midline reached it in 2022. Instead of reversing, SPX leapfrogged 3047 in November and didn’t look back until February when it plummeted by 35.4%, just missing a backtest (better late than never) of the 1.618 Fib at 2138.At that point the Treasury and the Fed got involved and the rest, as they say, is history.

    With chart patterns and technical analysis, it’s often quite useful to go back and look at past patterns. Much can be learned about why things happened and how past patterns could repeat.

    This morning, for instance, it appears we’re finally going to get a backtest of the most recent Fib level to have been leapfrogged. Better late than never.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Happy 10th Anniversary

    Ten years ago, I posted my first public observations on the state of the stock market. In Collision Looming, I noted a number of chart patterns which indicated a potential top, writing:

    Price target if the longer term wedge plays out is 46 – 100% of the rise [from 666], indicating 320-700 points on the SPX.

    With the S&P 500 at 1370, this meant a drop of at least 23% to a target of 670-1050 – a startling scenario since the market had more than doubled since its 2009 lows and sentiment was quite bullish.

    A few weeks later, I made an even more startling discovery: the S&P 500 was following in the footsteps of the 2007 top – an analog. Daily moves matched it in both timing and magnitude. If the trend were to continue, it would confirm what I had written back on May 2: a very significant selloff.

    I began posting about the analog on June 8 [see: Deja Vu] noting at the time:

    In any case, if SPX bounces as I expect here at 1280, it will have set up a similar channel.  The implication is that we will, indeed, start what looks like a new bullish move to the upside.

    It’s not.  Judging from past results, it’s a major headfake that will retest the former support line (bottom of the rising wedge) before resuming its decline.

    I expect the rebound to stop somewhere short of 1320 before the end of June — ideally Wednesday the 29th… Once we start down, we’ll complete the H&S that’s been forming for six months (the channel bottom is the neckline).

    Bottom line:  we have about two weeks left to plan those masterful bearish trades, but there are still a couple of pennies left in the path of this steamroller.

    I fine tuned the forecast extensively over the following weeks, adjusting the timing and price level of the final peak to July 21 and SPX 1344. On July 20 [see: Merry Christmas!] I wrote:

    In an effort to be as clear as possible… tomorrow is Christmas Eve 2007. If you’ve been following this blog, you know what that means and what to do.  We have maybe 20 points at the most to the upside, with 1340-1344 a reasonable target.

    Following up the next day in Pulling the Trigger:

    1347 might be the last best chance at an excellent short. I expect it to start down in earnest around 10:45 AM Pacific time.

    The rest, as they say, is history.  SPX topped at 1347 shortly thereafter and didn’t stop correcting until it reached 1074 in October – a 22% and 296-point correction which came reasonably close to the original 23% and 320-pt decline the charts indicated five months earlier.

    As the chart below shows, the analog had played out quite well. At least a few followers made a decent return trading on the drop, and a few more were able to protect their portfolios.

    As for me, I was hooked on the power of charting and technical analysis. Many times over the past 10 years, I’ve seen the markets respond exactly as they forecast, irrespective of bullish sentiment, earnings and Fed prognostications. It has been very gratifying.

    At times, though, it can be quite frustrating as actions are taken to counteract or mitigate the moves suggested by charts.  In October 2011, when SPX was in a position to construct another leg down per the 2011 as 2007 analog……we saw a breakout in the USDJPY and resurrection of the yen carry trade which busted the pattern.

    USDJPY began an impressive 68% ascent in October 2011, pouring gasoline on the bullish fire the Fed reignited with Operation Twist the previous month.

    With the success of the yen carry trade, the Fed and other central banks “taught” the increasingly algorithm-driven markets to pay strict attention to certain signals. This was a simpler and far less expensive way of triggering a particular response at a critical time than rolling out another round of QE.  But, there were occasional complications.

    USDJPY’s ascent (devaluation of the Japanese yen) meant that oil (priced in US dollars) prices soared – particularly after Japan’s nuclear reactors were shut down in the wake of Fukushima. With Japanese CPI nearing 4% (inconvenient when you’re trying to keep interest rates at or below 0%), the yen carry trade was running out steam.

    So, as “luck” would have it, oil prices suddenly crashed – at exactly the same time that USDJPY began another leg up.

    A few years later, when plunging oil prices began to worry investors about the strength of the economy, oil would bottom out on Feb 11 – the exact same day as stock prices.

    In addition to USDJPY and oil prices, VIX has become a favorite tool of the market’s protectors. Algos have learned that plunging volatility is a great signal to buy stocks. So, we’ll often see a sharp reversal or breakdown in VIX when stocks have reached critical support such as in the wake of the 2016 presidential election.

    These use of these and other tools have “saved” markets time and time again. They have also protected the reputation of central bankers at the Fed and ECB who, unlike the BoJ, insist that any connection between their actions and the stock market is purely coincidental.

    They have been able to “fine tune” the markets, nudging it hither and yon, promoting the premise of market integrity while saving big bazookas such as asset purchases for those instances when more drastic action is necessary.

    They have also complicated my job. As mentioned above, many bearish signals over the years have been countered or mitigated by central bank actions. The historically dependable Death Cross (where the 50-day moving average declines below the 200-day) for instance, has often as not resulted in an important bottom rather than a breakdown.

    Head & Shoulders patterns are frequently busted by a sudden, unexplained plunge in VIX or pop in USDJPY.  We saw it happen again just the other day in order to prevent a “whopping” 1.8% decline after an apparent trend line breakdown at a key Fibonacci level.

    The increasing frequency of these false alarms augments the effectiveness of central bankers’ tools, as traders are less likely to pile into a short position at the first sign of a downturn. Investors are more content to buy each dip – turning more and more traders into buy-and-hold, longer-term investors.

    While complicating the task of forecasting equity turning points, the use of these tools has actually improved our forecasts in other areas such as currencies and commodities.  For instance, the need to protect important price levels for SPX or DJIA quite often necessitates a dramatic and very predictable move in USDJPY or CL.

    We’ll still get those occasional home run short calls like May 20, 2015 [The Last Big Butterfly], October 3, 2018 [VIX Takes the Plunge], and Feb 20, 2020 [Buckle Up.]  But, the Fed is doing its best to turn traders into investors and to convince investors to never sell.

    Over the past few months, I have been working with a quant friend to fine tune a model which combines powerful quantitative sector rotation signals with chart patterns and technical analysis in order to optimize timing and enhance risk-adjusted returns. The model has generated risk-adjusted returns well in excess of the S&P 500 with very low volatility and minimal trading. I hope to be able to share with members by the end of May.

    In the meantime, I’d like to thank the members of this little club of ours. In the past 10 years, I’ve posted over 3,000 times, entailing over 50,000 charts and 2,500,000 words (think War and Peace times 5) and generating over 10 million page views – all without a single Cialis banner ad.

    Members have come and gone over the years, but I’m thrilled to say that many of the original 30-40 members from July 2011 are still on board.  I’m working harder than ever, usually putting in 12-hour days and still enjoying the challenge of what I feel is one of the best puzzles out there.

    I encourage members to reach out with any ideas re coverage in the coming year. Many of you have alerted me over the years to market conditions or anomalies which have led to interesting insights that benefit all of us. Questions are always welcome.

    Last, I’ve been heartened that a number of members who have drifted away over the years are finding their way back to us. Now through May 10, former members may rejoin at their last subscription price. Contact me for details. And, for those who would like to try out the site, we are again offering a discounted first month at only $99.  Click Here for details and to sign up.

    Cheers,

    Michael

     

     

     

     

  • Still Not Transitory

    At some point – perhaps after six months of hot inflation data – the Fed will be forced to admit that inflation pressure are not transitory. This morning we saw evidence that March personal incomes spiked by 21.1%, the most since 1946. Personal spending for the month shot up 4.2%, the most since last June. And, PCE’s 2.3% is the biggest since 2018.

    S&P futures are calling BS on the whole modest/transitory inflation story – off over 20 points so far.

    And, VIX’s bullish (bearish for stocks) 10/20 cross hasn’t gone away.

    continued for members(more…)