Tag: trend lines

  • DXY: Finally Breaking Out?

    Stocks tumbled yesterday on inflation numbers that call into question the pace of the Fed’s taper and rate increases. Then they rallied overnight on an 11.4% collapse in VIX. The most significant chart on my screens at the moment, though, is the US dollar. DXY has had great difficulty breaking out of a tightly controlled consolidation pattern that dates back to July 2020. It tried this past September, but was smacked down to support stocks’ recovery from that terrifying (sarc) 5.8% slump.Now, it’s making another bid for a breakout — one we’ve been expecting for months (a very lonely stance BTW) — which wouldn’t bode well for stocks. Is this one for real?

    continued for members(more…)

  • PPI Soars, CPI on Deck

    Producer Prices for Final Demand in October jumped 0.6% MoM and 8.6% YoY (6.2% less food, energy and trade.)Futures were little changed… …though the 10Y slipped to a cycle low of 1.43%.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Big Picture: Oct 27, 2021

    Equity markets rarely fail to rally into the end of the year.  But, there have been several noteworthy Q4 exceptions over the years, each of them marked by VIX’s bounce off well-established trend lines.

    Note that SPX’s yellow channel has been rising at a compouned 12.2% per year since the 2009 bottom – historically a very decent rate of return.  With SPX currently testing the channel top as VIX tests the rising purple trend line, SPX is at a critical juncture where it must either correct or break out.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Gold: Anatomy of a Rat’s Nest Chart

    Once in a while, charts are so crystal clear that we can see the future as easily as we can reflect on the past. Gold is not one of those charts. The zigs and zags come fast and furious and rarely correlate with anything happening in the real world. Witness the indifference this so-called inflation hedge has shown toward the highest inflation in 13 years.

    But, the charts have pointed out some excellent trading opportunities along the way – usually by highlighting trend changes (or continuation patterns) that offer strong directional hints.

    I thought it might be interesting to reflect on the use of channels. What do they tell us, and how can we use them to guide our trading?

    By the time we layer in all the trend lines, Fibonacci levels, moving averages, etc. charts can start to take on a rat’s nest look.

    But, if we strip away some of those things, the channels tell a very compelling story. GC’s long-term chart, for instance, starts with a long, pretty well-formed channel. It did a reasonably good job of guiding prices from the late 1990s until 2014.

    When it broke down in late 2014, it was a clear signal that the long-term trend had given up the ghost.

    We can see that the breakdown followed a pretty clear trend lower, marked by the red channel below. When GC rallied out of that falling red channel – a clear buy signal – we were able to construct a less bearish falling purple channel that guided prices for several more years. When GC reached the bottom of that channel, it accurately signaled a good buying opportunity. That signaled was reinforced when, in 2019, GC broke out of it. Once a few parallel highs and lows were established, we had a rising channel once again. But, GC broke out of that rising channel, requiring a more aggressive one. We added the rising purple channel to accommodate it……and expanded the red channel to make room for the new highs.Although it’s a little early to say with any certainty, the rising purple channel is threatening to break down. It obviously sets up a backtest of the rising red channel’s midline (the dashed red line.) If the two of them are breached, it would be a very bearish signal – particularly in light of the drop through the 200-DMA.

    Put it all together, throw in some trend lines and other chart patterns, and we get a pretty clear picture that GC is on the verge of a breakdown. The chart doesn’t necessarily tell us which way it will ultimately go, just that we’re at an important juncture – very useful information indeed.The factors have been busy overnight, seemingly in quarter-end mode to prompt a bullish run for the barn. Will it be enough?continued for members(more…)

  • Why Bonds Are Still Important

    I had an great question yesterday regarding the bond market: “Is it possible the fear of pandemic in spring 2020 affected the behavior of 2yr and 10 yr and then indirectly triggered the crash?”

    Pebblewriter longhaulers will recall that our bond cycle model forecast a severe plunge in interest rates long before anyone was talking about a pandemic. In August 2019, for example, we were already anticipating a drop to near or below zero around December 2020.It’s what the charts suggested, as we posted in April 2018 [see: Bonds – a Buying Opportunity]…

    …and it’s what was necessary in order to keep America’s books balanced.  Annual debt growth was averaging 5%, and debt:GDP had topped 100% for the past five years.

    As we pointed out in July 2019 [see: Why Interest Rates Must Not Rise] the only way to keep debt service from overwhelming other federal expenses had been to crash interest rates.

    The trick was how to force interest rates lower without alarming us economist types. Past maneuvers had involved adjusting Fed policy (not terribly effective for medium and long-term rates) and forcing inflation lower by forcing oil and gas prices lower as occurred in 2014-2016 and late 2018 (detrimental to stock prices.)

    CPI, which had spent most of 2018 above 2%, had declined to a more manageable 1.7% by September 2019. But, the year-end ramp job in oil prices sent CPI up to a troubling 2.3% by December. The 10Y rose from 1.43% in September to 1.95% in December and, as the chart below shows, threatened to break out.  Something, as they say, had to give.

    As the big brains at the Eccles Building were spitballing potential solutions, the most extreme case of deus ex machina imaginable landed in their laps.  COVID-19 did the Fed a solid – albeit one which went way overboard.

    Oil prices, inflation and the 10Y were suddenly in a race to zero (oil won) and the Fed suddenly faced a slightly bigger problem: how to prevent Armageddon. They needed higher oil prices, interest rates and inflation just to talk equity investors (well, algos) off of window ledges.It worked so spectacularly well that they painted themselves back into a corner very similar to the December 2019 one: rapidly rising inflation and interest rates thanks largely to spiking oil and gas prices – exactly what our models predicted would happen. YoY gas price increases and CPI have been so highly correlated that they are now literally on top of one another.

    For the past few thousand years, this would have been a serious problem.  Everybody knows interest rates spike when inflation spikes. Since the Fed essentially took over the bond market, however, they’ve been able to convince bond investors (well, algos) that spiking inflation isn’t a problem and, even if it is, it’s transitory.

    Want proof? Rates have actually declined since April’s 4.2% CPI print and are nearly back to the same level as before the bomb was dropped.If I walked up to you on a cloudless day and insisted that shaking my rain stick will make it pour, you’d probably double over with laughter. If I had a secret accomplice spray water from a garden hose all over us from an undisclosed location, you might begin to wonder if I was right.

    That’s what’s happening with interest rates right now. Except the rain stick is the Fed’s prognostications and the garden hose is actually a low-flying supertanker carrying 20,000 gallons.

    Of course bond investors care about spiking inflation. But, with the Fed pumping billions of dollars into the bond market every day (more on days with alarming economic data) to force interest rates lower, they can claim that said inflation (“did we mention it’s transitory?”) is obviously not a problem.  And the dopes in the financial press eat it up because, by God, they’re soaking wet.

    Instead of rising, interest rates decline, proving to all (especially the algos) that the Fed must know what they’re talking about or — to us more cynical types — that they’ve completely destroyed the bond market’s price discovery mechanism.

    So, did fear of the pandemic affect bond behavior and, thus, cause the crash? Absolutely – though it’s a bit of a chicken and egg situation. Everything unraveled at about the same time in the mother of all negative feedback loops.

    The irony is that it accomplished what the Fed needed to happen in the bond market — though to excess. The Fed can now use the pandemic as their excuse for the most rapid expansion of monetary supply in history– even as spiraling inflation crushes the disadvantaged whom the Fed claims it’s desperate to help.

    Now, on to the markets.  No surprise, but futures managed to ramp higher again overnight – creating the illusion, at least, that the downside case is off the table. It’s not.

    continuing(more…)

  • VIX: Just a Flesh Wound?

    In Friday’s post VIX: Back From the Dead we noted that VIX had recovered from the breakdown below trend dating back to Nov 27. This morning, it’s testing overhead resistance from Jan 4 and, if it’s able to break through, will likely take on resistance from Dec 21 or even Oct 29. Bears might want to hold off on the champagne just a bit longer, though. One of VIX’s favorite tricks is to race up to resistance in the pre-market so it has someplace to reverse lower from.

    The FOMC will issue its latest pearls of wisdom on Wednesday. And, as ES’s chart aptly illustrates, they are loathe to allow a significant decline in the lead-up to these exercises in obfuscation.

    Here’s the chart we posted Friday evening. continued for members(more…)

  • Update on VIX: Mar 10, 2020

    It’s been a while since we took a big picture look at VIX. Since it reached levels not seen since the GFC yesterday, this seemed like as good a time as any.

    VIX is an interesting instrument. Once a reliable measure of volatility in the market, it was used by many to hedge risk.  As equity corrections became an endangered species, however, fewer investors bothered.

    Eventually, VIX became a source of income for those willing to take a chance on selling vol. It might have seemed risky at times, but every one of the six times VIX exceeded 46 since 2010 was followed by a collapse to below 15.  Actually, make that 5 out of six times.On Feb 28, VIX shot up to 49.48, but it only dropped as low as 24.93 before bouncing up to yesterday’s high of 62.12. The price to which it rallied was significant.

    Eagle-eyed members will note it’s been one of the higher targets on our charts for years – but, one we seldom mention as VIX is always smacked down upon reaching a lesser Fib level and a price between 46 and 54.  From the post Market Timing, a Bad Thing? last October.

    The 25.50ish target represents the intersection of the .382 Fib, two red TLs and the midline of the white channel seen below. If 25.50 should ever be broken, things could get very interesting very quickly.

    The 62.12 high was very close to the .618 retracement (58.6) of the drop from 89.53 in 2008 to 8.56 in 2017.

    Now, it was no surprise that VIX stopped rising once ES had dropped to our 2728 target. But, the breakout begs the question: What do the charts say about the even higher targets?

    continued for members(more…)

  • Test Passed, So Far…

    ES spent 6 1/2 hours yesterday anguishing over the trend line/neckline we discussed.  When the Fed minutes came out, it even broke down a bit from the rising channel it had constructed overnight.  The breakdown seemed like it was sticking.  But, just after the close, WTI spiked and VIX dumped. That’s all it took to put ES back into bullish mode, prompting a 21-pt pop which fell apart overnight but is back in place as we approach the open. Meanwhile, VIX has constructed a little TL which could break down any minute and boost the algos if they should need help.  But, what if it holds?  (For the answer, see yesterday’s: This is a Test.)

    Should be a very interesting day.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Will This Time be Different?

    We would almost always expect a big bounce off SPX’s 200-day moving average. Despite yesterday’s dip below the 200-DMA, the index dutifully crept back above it in time for the close.  And, the futures are currently showing an 8-point gain.Yet, if an analog I’ve been watching and our yield curve model are correct, this bounce won’t last. Stocks could be sharply lower by Monday.

    continued for members(more…)

  • The Slope of Nope

    As a chartist, I’m often struck by how similarly the stock market acts at important tops and bottoms.  By “important tops” I’m speaking of those which precede large corrections or even crashes.  So, with apologies to Tim Knight’s excellent Slope of Hope

    In 2000, SPX retraced a Fibonacci 88.6% of its initial drop before falling off a cliff.  If you were to draw a trend line (TL) between the two tops, it would take on the slope of the yellow line below.The 2007 top was completely different: no big retracement, no place for a trend line with a similar shallow a slope to connect, just a setup for a gag featuring a roadrunner and a coyote.

    But, in 2011, we saw the pattern all over again: an 88.6% retracement and a very similar TL.What many didn’t realize at the time was that the TL from 2007 TL was simply making a return appearance.Isn’t it interesting, then, that the slope of the line between the Sep 21, 2018 high and today’s high (and passes through the 88.6% Fib retracement) is exactly the same?The Big Picture…

    Is it possible that all the bad economic and earnings news we’ve had these past few months is just…bad news?