Tag: gartley

  • Update on Bonds: Mar 07, 2013

    If rates really are heading back up in the near future, we’d expect to see bonds take a hit (and stocks, too, but that’s a different post.)  Back on Jan 21, we focused on the 10-year treasury (ZN.)

    We observed that ZN had just completed a large Crab Pattern and broken down from a rising wedge, and appeared to be due for a “significant retreat.”

    The chart below shows a big Crab (grey), followed by another Crab (red), a Bat (white) and another Crab (purple.)  Each previous Crab Pattern completion has been followed by a significant retreat, so we might suspect one here with the purple pattern completion.

    Since then, both the purple and white channel lines have broken down, suggesting more downside ahead. The intersection of the white channel bottom and purple channel midline is coming up in early April, and prices have fallen from 132’160 on Jan 21.  But, where’s the “significant retreat?”

    Shifting focus to the 20-year as represented by TLT (just for grins), the charts show continued weakness over the next couple of months — provided TLT can push through some important support.

    The harmonic picture is negative enough – given the potential Gartley or Bat Pattern in play. But, the white and red channels have both recently surrendered a support line.  Backtests are complete, and the next support is down around the .786 at 114.5 — though I suspect the .886 at 112.26 will get the nod.

    Note that it intersects with the falling white channel midline, the falling red channel bottom and the large white rising channel midline — all around late May-June.

    A slight overshoot would tag the .500 at 110.18 on a larger harmonic grid (purple) and establish a Point B for a pattern that might lead prices back down below the white midline.

    The fly in the ointment?  Check out the dashed red trend line cutting across the middle of the chart. It has influenced a few turns, and is just below current prices at around 115.60.

    Stay tuned…

  • Charts I’m Watching: Feb 28, 2013

    Yesterday was a great example of the beauty of Harmonics.  In conjunction with my RSI work and channel work, we were able to rack up 23 points on a day when the big picture is still fairly negative (remember Italy, the sequester, negative GDP, retailers’ horrid guidance?)

    By drawing important Fibonacci lines in the sand, we made the market prove to us it had more upside by crossing those lines. As we’ve discussed many times before, Harmonic Patterns don’t, by themselves, always tell you what the market is going to do in a particular time frame.

    But, they do an excellent job of “if-then” forecasting, such as “if the market reverses at Point A, we can be very confident of reaching Point B.”  Again, combining this information with other fairly reliable patterns, we can capture most of the points most of the time

    The market didn’t fall out of bed overnight, so I’ll take a long position on the open this morning in anticipation of tagging the .786/.886 combo at 1521.11/1521.19 or the .886 at 1525.70.

    Fresh charts in a few…

    UPDATE:  9:45 AM

    The channel placement is still somewhat speculative.  But, again, in a volatile situation like this, the market will show us whether it has more potential or not.

    We are nearing the .786 retracement of the move down from 1530, and the .886 of the move down from 1525.  They’re on top of one another, lending added validity.  So, all else being equal, we can expect a reversal here — especially given the 60-min RSI chart.

    Note we’re taking a 2nd crack at breaking out of the yellow channel at 61 — the range in which most moves fail.  Stay tuned.

    UPDATE:  9:50 AM

    Just tagged our target level, so I’m booking the 5 points from this morning here at 1521.29.

    A strong move back up through 1521 opens up 1526.  The immediate downside target is around 1510 a combination of Fib levels and the next lower purple channel line (the 25%.)  If that doesn’t hold, the bottom of the purple channel is currently down at around 1494.

    BTW, I’ve had a number of questions about the new fund in the works and the changes it might bring for this website.  I think the past few days are an excellent example of why a fund makes a lot of sense.  Yesterday, I was in and out of the market (on these pages) six times for a total of 23 points:

    1. Bought at 1497
    2. sold at 1507 (+10)
    3. bought at 1507
    4. sold at 1514 (+7)
    5. bought at 1514
    6. sold at 1520 (+6)

    Twenty-three points on 1497 is a little over 1.5% — a decent day, especially given that it occurred on a bounce in the midst of a downturn, which are generally tricky.  Twenty or thirty of those in a year would be a great year for most investment advisors.

    Given that it takes a few minutes to identify a situation, a few more to chart it, a few more to make the chart readable for members, and more still to post it online and compose a cogent comment or two, it’s challenging to get that information out to readers fast enough so that you can capture every single point that I do.

    Then there’s the issue of how to trade the information.  I just shorted SPX at 1521 with the expectation of an initial 10-point drop.  Suppose it pops up to 1525 60-seconds later?  Were you stopped out?  Do you hold on?   Wait, now it just dropped 20 points!  You refresh the screen…where’s the update!?

    While you’re anxiously refreshing the webpage, I’m looking at RSI channels (in multiple time frames), various chart patterns, checking the dollar/euro/bonds/VIX, looking for any news just out, etc.  I make a determination and either trade on it or sit pat.

    I then start the process of updating the chart and posting it online with supporting comments.  Best case…3-5 minutes.  Worst case, all hell is breaking loose and it takes 10-15 minutes or more.

    This is why I like the idea of a fund.  For better or worse, it’s the quickest, most efficient way to transfer value from my noggin into your net worth.  Investors can go on with their business meeting/golf game/ski run and leave all the sweating it out to me.

    BTW, I know a fund isn’t for everyone. For the rest of us, the website will continue to provide the exact same kind of information it always has.  But, it will evolve, ideally becoming more efficient with streamlined delivery accompanying the charts for the pebblewriter.com veterans and investment professionals who want to go it alone.

    For example, those who have been around for a while would completely understand a comment like “hit .786/.886 combo at 1521, Gartley/Bat or Butterfly Point B?  Charts later.”   That way, I could cut down on the time it takes to convey the essence of the post.  I’m also looking into ways to post the information on a chat-like platform, which might also eliminate email and log-in problems.

    The trick with investment advisor clients is finding a way to deliver timely information at a reasonable price without giving away the secret sauce to potential competitors.  It will mean substantially higher fees for future subscribers ($2,500 on Mar 4), but won’t affect current members who have taken advantage of the current membership offer.

    Have you locked in your subscription price yet? CLICK HERE

    More shortly

    UPDATE:  12:50 PM

    SPX won’t go down without a fight.  It has retraced almost .886 of its declines from 1521.37, meaning it’s about to reverse at 1520.65 and head lower (a Bat Pattern) or is destined for the 1.618 at 1525.29 — also the .886 retracement of the 1530-1485 decline (1525.70) and the level of the last high on the 25th.

    As noted earlier, a push through 1521 opens up 1526.  SPX has till about 1:30 EST to decide: push up through 1521 or a channel breakdown.

    Note the close proximity of the white channel line, which will always, always offer support… until it doesn’t.

    The RSI picture is mixed at present, so we’ll stay focused on harmonics and channels.  Looking at other indicators, the dollar is hanging in there in its own rising channel.

    It recovered its midline just before equities opened this morning, and broke out of its a channel on its 15-min RSI.  It tagged 82, but hasn’t yet been able to break above — much less reach its short-term target of 82.136-82.281.

    UPDATE:  1:20 PM

    There’s our answer, a breakout above the .786/.886 Fib at 1521.11.

    Playing the long side again, with initial target of 1525.70, trailing stops starting at 1521.

    Charts in a few…

    UPDATE:  2:05 PM

    Getting pretty close, now.  This should also be a tag on the large purple channel midline and the proposed yellow channel top.

    UPDATE:  2:20 PM

    Let’s review the implications to our forecast of tagging 1525.70.  We started into this yesterday, but got interrupted by a pretty wild intra-day ride.

    continued for members(more…)

  • What Recovery?

    source: eurostat.ec.europa.eu

    It was thoughtful of eurostat to include the US in their chart.  Funny, that’s not the chart one would picture based on the MSM’s steady drumbeat of “recovery!”

    Germany, which had previously taken an ambivalent attitude about the soaring euro, might change its tune following its worst GDP print since Q408.  The main culprit?  Exports, which fell 15.4% from November – the worst monthly decline since 2007 – and 5.7% YoY.  Straight from the Bundesbank:

    Housing figures for Q4 should be out soon, but look for a continuation of the slide.

    A falling euro might increase exports, but make oil even more expensive – the same energy/export conundrum in which Japan finds itself.

    UPDATE:  12:20 PM

    SPX continues to move sideways.  The H&S pattern completed yesterday busted, completed again, busted, and is working on completing a third time.  This is a very ugly pattern, with hardly anything normal about it — especially the 3 right shoulders.

    It should have already paid off yesterday with a trip down to 1511ish.  The red channel I drew yesterday is holding nicely so far, but a departure to the downside this morning was quickly erased.  It even fell through the larger red channel midline but rebounded.

    Clearly, the bulls are trying valiantly to defend the 1520 level.  But, can they?

    continued for members(more…)

  • Is It or Isn’t It a Recession?

    ECRI’s Weekly Leading Indicator (WLI) came out Friday at 130.2 — up from 129.6 the week before.  Further, they reported that the index’s annualized growth rate increased from 8.2 the previous week to 8.9% — the highest since May 2010.  I wondered: are they retracting their Sep 2011 recession forecast?  Are things really getting better?

     

    CAN’T WE ALL JUST GET ALONG?

    There’s currently an argument raging between various economists and analysts as to whether the US is still in/dipping back into a recession or is on the mend. ECRI is pretty sure we’re in one, while folks like Doug Short and, of course, the mainstream media think not.

    There’s no question that we’ve seen an uptick in several economic measures. My own thesis is that most of these have been not secular, but cyclical swings.  In other words, I don’t yet see evidence of a sustainable trend change, only natural swings from one side of a channel or wedge to the other.

    Here’s an example I posted last week. Total Confidence has traced out a pretty solid-looking channel, while the Present and Expectations indices have formed expanding wedges (and are nowhere near their upper bounds, especially given the recent downturns.)

    underlying chart from briefing.com

     

    Hardly a day goes by when I don’t second guess myself.  Is all the “good news” just one big, well-coordinated head fake or am I missing something?  I spent much of the weekend studying ECRI’s historical WLI (who says technical analysts don’t live exciting lives!?) and found a lot to think about.  First, a brief primer on Harmonics.

     

    HARMONICS

    Regular readers of pebblewriter.com (heck, even the irregular ones) know all about Harmonics and that the corrections experienced in April 2010, May 2011 and Sep 2012 correspond to the important Fib levels of 61.8%, 78.6% and 88.6%.

    For the uninitiated, measure the drop from SPX 1576 (Oct 2007) to 666 (Mar 2009) and multiply it by a Fibonacci 61.8% and you get 1228.74.  SPX reached 1219.80 in April 2010 (within 10 points) and promptly sold off by 17% over the next three months.

    In May 2011, SPX peaked about 10 points away from the 78.6% Fib level (completing a Gartley Pattern) and plunged 21.6%.  And, in September 2012, SPX reached the 88.6% Fib level (completing a Bat Pattern) and corrected by almost 9%.

    Those of us who follow Harmonics were well aware of each of these downturns well in advance [see: HERE, HERE and HERE] and profited nicely from the market’s plunges.  Those who rely solely on fundamentals or [involuntary shudder] the mainstream media…not so much.

     

    THINGS THAT MAKE YOU GO “COOL!”

    While I had noticed the WLI’s channel-like general decline before, I never noticed that it also complied with the rules of Harmonics.  From its all-time high of 143.73 in Jun 2007, the WLI plunged to a low of 105.40 in Mar 2009.

    Like SPX, it found its footing (thanks to QE1) and started higher.  Its first big pause was in Oct 2009 at the 61.8% Fib level.  It paused again in Jan 2010 near the 70.7% Fib, and eventually reached the 78.6% level in April — completing a Gartley Pattern as SPX had finally retraced 61.8% of its drop.

    One could infer from the mismatched Fib levels that the economy — as measured by ECRI’s leading indicators — was ahead of the market at this point. The WLI had retraced 78.6% of its drop, while SPX had only retraced 61.8%.  In any case, they both suffered from the removal of the QE drip – SPX shedding 17% and WLI 11%.

    When the Fed realized their patient would flatline without more QE, they were back with QE2.  The market took off, reaching the 78.6% Fib in May 2011.  This also completed a Crab Pattern, a 161.8% extension of the amount of the Apr-Jul 2010 slide.

    The WLI, however, retraced only 78.6% of its slide since its 2010 high.  In other words, the market was now officially ahead of the economy.

    Following the expiration of QE2, SPX plunged 21.6% to 1074 through October 2011, while WLI gave up 8.9%.  From there, SPX climbed to 1474 primarily on Fed jawboning and promise of more QE — which it finally delivered the day before the 1474 high.

    The timing was no doubt an effort to send the SPX soaring right through the 88.6% Fib retracement of the 1576 – 666 crash.  I seriously doubt that “two points over” was what they had in mind (the market sold off anyway, correcting a respectable 8.8% to 1343.)

    The WLI, in the meantime, topped out at 127.77 — only an 88.6% retracement of its decline from its previous high in 2011.  Again, the market was outpacing the economy.

     

    IS IT OR ISN’T IT?

    The world of market prognosticators is, as always, divided.  There are those who believe the economy is improving, and the market – as a leading indicator itself – is all the proof we need.  Then, there are those who believe the market is priced well in excess of levels justified by the underlying economy — which remains in or is dipping back into a recession.

    Whether QE has “saved” the economy or not, I don’t know of any respected economist or technician who doubts that it has significantly goosed (i.e. “manipulated”) the markets. And, we should pay attention to the disconnect between the markets and the economy as evidenced by the SPX/WLI comparison.

    The WLI just hit an important Fib level (88.6%) after demonstrating that it does, indeed, pay attention to such things.  This occurred at the same time that the S&P 500 hit several important Fib levels and is thus, by my reckoning at least, poised to correct [see: Satisfaction.]

    We all know the old truism “the market isn’t the economy.” However, another quarter of negative GDP following the tax hikes recently enacted and spending cuts in the works would certainly remind investors that the market and economy are, indeed, joined at the hip.

    I care about the economy because I have children.  The Fed’s unprecedented experiment in QE will quite possibly end very badly for the country, for my children and for yours.  But, there ain’t much We the People can do to influence Fed policy.  They don’t answer to us or our political “leaders.” So, we play the cards we’re dealt.

    As an investor, my goal is to capitalize on whatever the market throws at us — regardless of how manipulated it might be, and regardless of what economists call the current business cycle. If depression or hyper-inflation come along, we’ll hopefully see it coming and be well-positioned.

    Are we still in or dipping back into a recession? Will the current QE4-ever result in another 2009-2011 run, or does the market’s yawn last September signal the end of QE’s effectiveness?  We’ll find out in time.  In the meantime, we have some very good tools at our disposal that have provided excellent returns in a very difficult market.  I’ll continue to call it as I see it, and appreciate having you all along for the journey.

     *   *   *   *   *   *   *   *

  • Now What?

    First, a quick overview…

    The dollar got clobbered overnight, knocking it temporarily out of the white channel that’s guided it since Jan 11.

    But, interestingly, its RSI channel is doing just fine, thank you.

    The EURUSD continues to levitate, but still hasn’t broken the last important interim top put in on Feb 24.  It is also bumping up against two 25% channel lines, so could very well stall out here at the .886.

    There is still ample negative divergence regardless of which channel ultimately wins out.

     

    With the market exceeding the recent 1474 highs, the analog that did so well for us since last April is officially dead.  This begs the question: “now what?”  I see three big issues hanging over the market right now:

      1. earnings season —  AAPL in particular
      2. the US budget/debt ceiling imbroglio
      3. new highs justified?

    Earnings

    GOOG and IBM both gapped up this morning, but the earnings that can really move the market — AAPL — comes after the close.  We’ll take a fresh look at the AAPL chart later today.

    Budget/Debt-Ceiling

    In a few hours, the House will probably pass a measure to postpone the debt ceiling debate until May.  Reid and Obama have both said they’re on board, so this appears to be a done deal.  If House Republicans don’t fall in line, as occurred with “Plan B,” the market will sell off precipitously.

    New Highs

    The market’s strength has caught many off guard, including yours truly.  Many are calling for new all-time highs for SPX. The 2007 high of 1576 is now only 84 points away, so a few good sessions could do it.

    We’ll take a fresh look, focusing on the harmonic and chart pattern picture as well as the establishment agenda.  “What’s that?” you say.  Say all you want about random walks, CAPM, dividend discount models and Dow Theory.  Like any government-managed enterprise, the market is subject to the policy goals and needs of those who attempt to control it.

    Even to my cynical ears, this sounds a bit like rants from the tin-foil hat crowd.  But, consider the news on Egan-Jones yesterday.  This is one of the biggest stories of the month, yet predictably earned only this from WSJ/Marketwatch:

    CNBC was slightly more generous, yet still presented only the SEC’s side of the story.  It’s a story that deserves to be told because it speaks volumes about the degree to which the market is presently being controlled.  And, I’m not just talking about quantitative easing, though I suppose we’d have to consider QE exhibit #1.

    Last summer the market crashed 22%.  It was an analog (replay) of the 2007 top, so we saw it coming in plenty of time to profit quite handsomely.  But, it was a huge wake-up call for The Powers That Be (TPTB) or Plunge Protection Team, Wall Street Cabal — whatever you want to call it.

    With virtually unlimited power and unlimited resources, why couldn’t they prevent something like that from happening?  More importantly, if the top was a replay of the 2007 top, might the rest of 2011 play out like 2008-2009?

    It didn’t, because they learned from the crash of July-August.  First, they tweaked the markets just enough to bust important chart patterns that were playing out.  Second, they tweaked the rules to provide for more time to contain any damage which might otherwise occur (circuit breakers, etc.)  Third, they attacked those who had “caused” the crash.

    S&P CEO Deven Sharma was one of the first victims.  In the wake of the 2007 financial crisis, S&P was rightly pilloried for having pulled its punches — particularly on mortgage and banking related debt.  This was no surprise to anyone who’s ever worked on Wall Street — which pays for these supposedly unbiased views.

    An infamous exchange between two S&P analysts in April 2007 aptly illustrates:

    “BTW, that deal is ridiculous.”

    “I know, right . . . model def(initely) does not capture half the risk.”

    “We should not be rating it.”

    “We rate every deal. It could be structured by cows and we would rate it.”

    Imagine if Hollywood studios funded the reviews of their movies.  Would you care if they received thumbs up or down?  So, in August 2011 S&P found religion and bravely downgraded US debt.  Seventeen days later, Sharma was fired and replaced with the COO of Citibank, the bank whose existence relies on the absence of any future downgrades.

    Egan-Jones beat S&P to the punch, downgrading US debt on July 16.   Two days later, the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations called looking for information on the downgrade.

    On October 12, Egan Jones was formally notified of a Wells Notice — they were being investigated.  On April 24, the SEC filed a cease and desist order against Egan-Jones — the only rating firm not on the take — stating the action was “necessary for the protection of investors and in the public interest.”

    The financial establishment’s interests, sure.  But, to frame this obvious smack down as “in the public interest” is laughable alarming.  Egan-Jones was the one rating firm with the balls to point out the country’s crumbling financial condition and stick to their guns.  Now they’ve been branded as deceitful, dangerous.  George Orwell spoke the truth in 1984:

    “In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”

    That other deep thinker, Jim Morrison, provided a similarly profound observation:

    “Whoever controls the media controls the mind.”

    The extent to which the market has been manipulated is deserving of its own post.  But, this Zerohedge article, forwarded by a member, is a great preview.

    Okay, so I know what you’re thinking: if the market is so heavily manipulated (and, presumably, insulated from downturns) why bother trying to beat it?  Simple.

    1. Chaos theory tells us they won’t have enough fingers to plug every hole in the dike (TPTB have similar “never again” strategy sessions after every crash.)
    2. Even when things do run as programmed, we can still effectively capture enough significant swings in the markets enough of the time to boost returns and, more importantly, try to avoid huge downdrafts.

    Over the very long-term, stocks return 8-10% — depending on the time frame examined.  But, sadly, most of us are limited to 40-60 years of investing.  And, a 60% crash right before starting a business, buying a home or beginning retirement could be devastating.

    So, we’ll keep plugging away, letting the markets tell us where they want to go…while trying to get there first.

    So, the question is “Now What?”  We’ll start by looking at the harmonic picture.  As detailed in our last review of all the previous tops, harmonic patterns are very likely to come into play.  So, we’ll start with the charts, then move on to the agenda question and, last take a look at AAPL.
    Since we’ve exceeded the range at which this rally could be considered a double top, we’re probably going higher still. So, we’ll examine the 1.272 and 1.618 extensions.

    In terms of a trading strategy, I’d be comfortable going long here at 1491.  But, disappointing AAPL earnings could knock the stuffing out of the market.  So, those with weak hearts should probably stay on the sidelines until tomorrow morning.

    The most recent patterns show a few possibilities, some of which are clumped together in fairly narrow ranges.  The largest of the patterns — the yellow grid — shows a 1.272 Butterfly Pattern extension at 1510.19 that intersects with the 2.24 extension of the decline (purple grid) from 1448 – 1343.

    A Butterfly Pattern is a good bet, as the Dec 18 reversal at 1448 pretty much nailed the .786 Fib level Point B (1446.44) which Butterfly Patterns require.

    1510.19 also falls within the confines of the thin red line — the TL connecting the Apr 2 and Sep 14 highs that would probably satisfy the EW requirements of an ending diagonal.  I know you’re out there, my Waver friends.  Please weigh in, as I know only enough EW theory to be dangerous.

    The white pattern is appealing enough, but I would have to consider it secondary in importance to the yellow since it began at a less momentous point X.  Ditto for the grey pattern.

    Although it should be noted that we faced a similar dilemma when choosing between the Point X’s for the Butterfly patterns beginning in 2011 [see: All the Pretty Butterflies.] In the end, it was a point similar to the white pattern 1.0 Fib at 1464.02 that determined the April 2 turn.  It featured a Point B closest to the .786 Fib.

    Zooming out, we can see that the 2011 highs could very well still influence the outcome of the current top.  The chart that includes everything is a little busy…

    …so I’ll clean it up by eliminating the interior retracement levels and switching to weekly.

    The target areas can be more easily seen in this close up.

    Note that the large red pattern, the one whose 1.272 extension helped me accurately forecast the April top, comes into play at its 1.618 extension of 1515 – only a few points away from the 1509-1510 level discussed above.

    This is promising, as patterns that influence markets once (that was an 11% correction, after all!) are more likely to do so again.  And, patterns that the market completely ignores — such as the yellow and white patterns from May and July 2011 — are less likely to suddenly leap into a position of authority.

    And, there’s also a purple 1.618 extension (set up by the 1422 – 1266 decline) at 1518.57.  Again, this is close enough to be considered significant.

    If 1520 is exceeded, then we’ll look at the next higher grouping: 1553-1555.  This “group” is basically the two yellow 1.618’s.  Again, the larger pattern’s 1.272 had no influence on the market.  The smaller pattern’s 1.272 is the one coming up at 1519.

    Summary

    My leading harmonic forecast is for 1509-1515.  I can’t imagine getting this close to 1500 and not snagging it for the trophy case.  And, I like the idea of dancing with the harmonic patterns that brung us.

    My secondary goal is slightly higher at 1553-1555, so there should be opportunities to jump back in and capture most of any upside above 1520 if/when appropriate.  Such a move would likely follow a reversal from 1509-1515 back down to 1474ish and would constitute a fifth wave rather than the ending diagonal suggested above.

    If AAPL’s earnings stink up the joint after the closing bell, going long won’t have looked very smart.  But, judging from the steadily appreciating share values, I’m guessing that a relatively positive result is already being leaked.

    Chart Patterns

    I won’t rehash the stuff already posted in the past couple of weeks.  Just take a look at the rising wedge that would be confirmed by a reversal at 1510 as early as tomorrow.  The target would come at the .886 of the base to apex price range and .618 of the time range (almost too good to be true.)

    We’re currently very close to the .786 of 1498, which tells me there’s a decent chance of a run up to 1500ish into the close.

    UPDATE:  3:45 PM

    AAPL is up almost 9 points at the moment.  A rally past 1426 would take it up out of the falling white channel it’s been in since last August.

    Anything over 515 would take RSI above the white and purple RSI channel midlines.   So, as expected, much is riding on the earnings report and how it’s perceived.

    We’ll watch these RSI channels, though. A return to the top of the yellow (and, especially the white) channel would surely spell a reversal.

    The Agenda

    I think it’s pretty straight-forward — bag an important new high, but without setting the bar so high that expectations can’t be managed.  At 1510, SPX clears 1500 but buys some time before the pressure of “will it exceed 1576?” comes to bear (no pun intended.)

    Then, get through the budget mess (or, more kicking of the can) and see where we are.  If we get a sequester, so be it.  The establishment will be well positioned ahead of time and the correction will be managed.

    After the shock of it wears off and prices have firmed in the 1200-1300’s, time to establish the next leg higher.

    Now, the big question is whether TPTB can engineer such a move without it getting out of hand — as it often does.

    Stay tuned.

  • Charts I’m Watching: Jan 14, 2013

    ORIGINAL POST:

    The dollar is making a stand at the upper end of the target range I charted Friday, but hasn’t yet broken out of the steep falling channel.  While there was a turn at the .618 Fib that would justify a .786 completion (a Gartley), the more obvious Point B was at the .382.

    In a perfect world, this would signal DX has further downside potential to the .886 for a Bat Pattern completion — though, obviously, not every corrective wave has to be a harmonic pattern.

    The EURUSD similarly reached a common turning point at the 1.272 extension of the latest move down from Dec 19 (or Jan 2, take your pick.)

    But, as can be seen, the rally from last week features no potential Point B whatsoever.   It’s hard to call this a Butterfly Pattern in the absence of an actual pattern.

    Furthermore, the tails on the daily candles offer an even more aggressive upper bound for the rising wedge we’ve been charting for the past several weeks.

    Equities are pointing to a soft opening, but nowhere near what one would normally expect with horrid AAPL news on the tape — much less the approaching budget showdown.

    Regular readers are well aware of the importance of the 500 price level for AAPL.  As we’ve discussed many times, the completion of the H&S pattern could have dire consequences for AAPL and the entire market.

    continued for members(more…)

  • Channeling a Top

    We got the reversal we were looking for last Friday, but as detailed in the last forecast there is still some uncertainty as to the ultimate outcome of this latest rally.

    We remain short from 1462, but a stop in the 1466-1468 range would be prudent.  A rally through 1474 changes our forecast, as discussed yesterday.

    The euro bounced off the bottom of the rising wedge we’ve been tracking as expected.  There is negative divergence relative to the Dec 7 low; so, in all likelihood, the larger wedge should break.

    The daily RSI shows the two options quite well — a bounce off the yellow channel line or just a back test of the broken purple channel line.

    The dollar continues to move in tandem with equities.  It rose last week as SPX rallied, and is off today.  But, like EURUSD, there is marked divergence on the daily chart since it broke up through the top of the red price channel and retested the bottom of the white price channel.

    It reversed at the .786 of the B-C (purple) drop.  And, the 1.618 extension of this move is the same level as the .786 of X-A:  83.10ish.  This would set up a tag of the white channel mid-line somewhere around Jan 22-23 (the .886 intersects with the mid-line around Mar 6.)

    I posted quite a bit over the weekend about the SPX forecast, so I won’t rehash it here.  Suffice it to say we need to see some follow-through on the dip this morning in order to get anything going on the downside.

    The 15-min chart shows a potential H&S pattern that targets 1443.  But, SPX will need to reverse before 1468 for it to play out.

    I’ve updated the channels and harmonics for the most recent top.  In general, they confirm the current forecast.  But, there is plenty of wiggle room.

    continued for members

    (more…)

  • Down the Rabbit Hole

    “In another moment down went Alice after it, never once considering how in the world she was to get out again.”
    Lewis Carroll, Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland

    Not quite four months ago, the Fed guaranteed lower interest rates and higher stock prices forever.  At least that was the mainstream media’s take on QE3.  The market shot up about 40 points in a day, then did something rather curious.  It stopped.

    While the rest of the world took advantage of the pause to shift more money in AAPL, those who study harmonics loaded up on shorts in anticipation of the huge Bat Pattern that was completing [see: The World According to Ben.]

    After having reversed at the Fibonacci 61.8% of the 2007 to 2009 crash, SPX had reached the 88.6% level.  Would it be a huge reversal as occurred when the Gartley Pattern completed at the .786 (- 21.6%) or something more modest?

    The fact is, we don’t know yet.  After shedding 131 points (8.9%) from September to November, SPX has retraced 119 points — roughly 88.6% of them.

    This means that SPX has constructed another Bat Pattern over the past 4 months.

    It’s easier to see if we zoom in.

    Like the larger pattern that took place from 2007 to 2012, will this pattern deliver a big reversal or something more modest?  For help, we can examine how SPX reacted the last time it reached a major Fibonacci level — the Gartley Pattern at the .786 in May 2011.

    SPX lost 112 points to 1258.07 before regaining about 88.6% of them to complete a Bat Pattern (the light blue pattern.)  At that point, it did it all over again (the red pattern.)

    In retrospect, the move from 1370 to 1258 was the 1st wave.  The move back up to 1356 was the 2nd, corrective wave.  It was powerful and quick — taking only 14 sessions compared to the 1st wave’s 33.  This fooled a lot of investors into thinking it was a motive wave and was going to establish a new high.

    Note: For those of us following an analog that compared the 2011 top to the 2007 top, it was a fabulously opportune time to start loading up on shorts [see: Why Do Analogs Work?]  Our gains over the next couple of weeks were nothing short of spectacular.

    The same thing happened a second time (the red pattern.)  The wave from 1356 to 1295 took 7 sessions, while the wave back up to 1347 took only 3.  Again, this suggested higher prices, not the powerful reversal that slashed 246 points in only 13 sessions.

    Are there any parallels between the market’s reversal at 1370 and its reversal at 1474?  As regular readers know, I am tracking a new analog [see: A New Old Analog] that suggests there are.  But, there’s a line in the sand at current price levels.

    We can argue all day about whether the pathetic fiscal cliff deal, combined with the latest QE incarnation, should mean higher prices.   But, if the latest Bat Pattern doesn’t hold, and prices ramp up past 1474, I’ll consider the analog broken and start charting upside targets.

    But, it won’t be because the Transportation Index just made a new high.  It simply completed a Crab Pattern (on negative divergence I might add), imbedded in the tail end of a large Bat Pattern that it’s been trying to complete since February.

    And, it won’t be because the Russell 2000 just made a new high — which can also be viewed as a quadruple top (dashed purple TL) that coincides with: (1) a Butterfly Pattern completion (in purple); (2) a Crab Pattern completion (in red); (3) a back-test of a well-formed rising wedge; and, (4) the .786 time fib of the wedge.  All of this, of course, is on negative divergence.

    It would be in spite of a dollar index that just broke out of a channel that dates back to May (red), after testing the bottom of a channel (in white) that dates back to Feb 2011.

    It broke out of and back-tested the latest channel on the hourly chart, too.

    I’ve always wondered what would happen when The Powers That Be threw everything they had at the market and it yawned.  Might that be a rabbit hole from which there is no easy escape?

    Between QE3, ESM, Congressional Kumbaya singing…the market should be hitting new highs.  So, why is it mired at the same point (metaphorically, at least) that preceded the last big correction?

    The market is currently frozen in headlights, wondering whether to respect the latest Bat Pattern or not.  So, I’m going to take the opportunity to review our analog and general forecast.

    To be continued…

  • Charts I’m Watching: Dec 27, 2012

    The dollar broke down from its steepest channel (in white) as I suspected, settling into a consolidation that might flesh out the larger purple channel today or tomorrow before breaking out of the yellow channel it’s been in since Nov 12.  My target remains the .618 at 79.319 on the purple grid.

    I say “might” because the 60-min RSI features a well-defined channel (rising, white) that could legitimately continue to nudge prices upward at a more modest clip now that RSI has lost the purple channel.

    The EURUSD, in the meantime, reversed right at its .618 as expected, but then broke out of its falling channel overnight to extend just beyond the .786 at 1.3275, completing a Gartley Pattern (white.)  With the .618 reversal, it could also be working on a Bat Pattern that completes at the .886 of 1.3290.

    Note, however, that it has already reached the .886 of a pattern drawn from Dec 20 instead of Dec 19 as shown above; so, there is potential for a reversal without any additional upside first.

    A little more negative divergence would help sell me on this being a top for the pair.  Once it does reverse, there is ample downside.  We’ve yet to see a significant sell-off since it broke down from the rising wedge last week.

    In equities, my core position remains short since 1447 on Dec 18, but we concurrently played an expected bounce from the completion of a Crab Pattern yesterday at 1416.43 with stops at 1415.

    UPDATE:  10:30 AM

    SPX just broke down through the bottom of the white channel that’s carried prices higher since the 1343 low.  The next potential support is the .500 Fib of the 1474 to 1343 drop at 1408.93, which intersects with the .382 of the 1343 to 1448 rally at 1408.02.  It’s also the 25% line of the falling channel from Dec 11 (yellow, below.)

    The dollar poked up above the top of the yellow channel and is testing yesterday’s 79.81 high.

    This is also the mid-line of another channel I’ve been watching, shown below in purple — an area of potential resistance for the dollar, support for equities.

    A sustained push through 1408 leaves little in the way of channel or Fib support until 1393.45 (the .382 of 1474-1343, white below) or 1395.68 (the .500 of 1343-1448, purple.)

    But, there’s not much else there to recommend this for a substantial bounce.  We might  get nothing more than a back test of the DX yellow channel, then off to the races.  The concurrent move for SPX might be a backtest of the broken purple channel and white channel midline at around 1420-1422.  But, I’m not inclined to play that bounce.

    There are only 10 sessions left before our target of 1284-1290 on January 11.  That’s roughly 12 points per day, so drops like today’s will be the norm — not the exception.

    The only other potential support I see is the bottom of the white channel, currently at the purple .618 (1383.33) and the red .786 (1381.50.)   Bulls will want to defend 1381.50, as it was a Bat Pattern completion at the next higher Fib level (the .886 at 1472.43) that got the correction started in the first place.

    Remember, 1474 is where we sold our QE3 longs and went short back on Sep 14 [see: The World According to Ben.]  The bullish case would benefit most by painting a drop to the next lowest Fibonacci Level (the .786) as a little correction on the way to new highs.

    If SPX is very oversold at that point, I’ll consider playing a bounce.  But, as of right now, there’s no positive divergence to support catching this falling knife.

    UPDATE:  2:50 PM

    We’re getting a decent bounce here at 1401.80.  Nothing special going on in terms of Fib levels, but some channel action and a nice round number bounce are playing into it.  Worth a short-term long, IMO.

    It’s likely the market is getting a lot of help from AAPL — which is just a breath away from completing its H&S pattern again.  Recall that since we called the top back on Nov 27 [Update on AAPL] it went down and bounced at its neckline as expected — tagging 501.23 on the 17th.

    It was a nice 33-pt bounce, retracing a Fibonacci 38.2% back to a purple channel line.

    Today, AAPL came dangerously close to completing the pattern yet again — putting in a 504.66 low versus the neckline’s 502.90.  In so doing, it completed a little Bat Pattern on the 60-min chart which should get a reaction back up to 512-515 or so.

    After that rally fails, however, we’re left with a Crab Pattern (smallest pattern in red) that points the way to 480.42.  Note that this is in the same vicinity as a .786 (in white) at 480.65 and a Butterfly Pattern completion at 481.59.

    If 480 can’t hold, there is another Crab Pattern completion waiting below at 446-452 (red 261.8, white 161.8 and 88.6.)

    If/when the H&S pattern completes, it targets the June 2011 low of 310.  But, don’t be surprised if we get a very strong backtest — even a breakout — of the neckline first.  There are a lot of players with a lot of money who understand full well what a close below 500 means for this stock and the overall market.

    UPDATE:  3:30 PM

    SPX continues its back test of the recently broken channel lines.  It would have to break up through 1422.58 before the acceleration channel is endangered.

    As of now, it looks like a parallel of previous steep plunges such as that of November 2012…

    …as well as the one in April – June 2011.

    12:40 — getting close…

    UPDATE:  3:45 PM

    That should about do it.  SPX just tagged the upper bound of the white channel…

    …and, DX just completed a back test of the yellow channel.

    I would be very leery of playing the bounce any further than right here at 1421 — the .886 retrace of the drop from yesterday’s 1423.97 and the .618 of the drop from Dec 21’s 1432.78.

     

    More later.

  • Charts I’m Watching: Dec 10, 2012

    The market continues to walk a tightrope between another leg up and a very significant tumble.  We’ve been here many times before in the past year, and it isn’t getting any more fun.  To recap…

    We remain short from 1423 on Dec 3 [see: Without a Net].  This was target A established in our Oct 26 forecast [see: A New Old Analog] and can be seen in the original chart below.

    Note that 1423 was very close to the .618 retracement (1424.41 on the white grid below) of the 1474 – 1343 decline.  Prices reversed there as we expected, shedding 25 points to 1398 in its first wave down (in line with our forecast of 1400.)

    That .618 retracement of the 1474-1343 wave down portends one of three outcomes:

    1. the bearish case:  a corrective wave 2 which sets up a more powerful wave 3 down
    2. the bullish case:  the first of a series of impulsive waves to new highs
    3. the middle case: the “A” subwave in an A-B-C corrective wave that points higher before wave 3 down.

    The first case is pretty clear cut, and has been detailed in prior posts.

    The third is also pretty clear, as the .618 retracement to 1423 could be merely a Point B in a Gartley Pattern to the .786 (1446) or Bat Pattern to the .886 (1459.)

    If SPX blows through 1425, I’m fully prepared to switch sides and take a stab at re-shorting at those higher levels.

    The big imponderable is case #2.  The top question I’ve received over the past week is whether a fiscal cliff deal would result in such a move.  It’s pretty easy to imagine that sort of a market reaction, even though — like last year’s debt ceiling compromise — it would hardly be justified.

    One thing is indisputable:  deal or no deal, we’ll get higher taxes and lower government spending.  Any combination of the two will negatively impact GDP.   By the same token, though, any deal would almost certainly mean a bump in prices.

    UPDATE:  11:50 AM

    Last Friday, SPX came within 48 cents of retracing .886 (1420.82) of its 1423.73-1398.23 decline.  This morning, it sealed the deal, reaching 1421.64 and completing the Bat Pattern.

    In the process, though, it tagged the neckline of the potential Inverted Head & Shoulder pattern we discussed Friday.   The pattern, if it plays out, targets 1507ish.  For the pattern to play out, we’d (at least) want to see a close above the shoulder line at 1420.80.

    But, it’s important to point out that not every IH&S pattern plays out.   Sometimes, it’s just market makers trying to shake things up a little bit.  Here’s one that didn’t play out last year, for example.

    Suppose we went up and tagged the actual .618 at 1424.41 for instance.  It’d be easy to see it as the bullish case playing out, what with a higher high and all.

    continued for members(more…)