Futures regained most of yesterday’s losses on the back of a VIX smackdown and a sharp ramp in USDJPY. Still, ES is hovering just below its SMA10.
For those playing BA, note that it has finally joined AAPL in backtesting its SMA200 – clearing the way for the next leg down as long as it remains below 363.41.
continued for members…
(more…)
We started posting about TSLA a little over a year ago when it dipped below important horizontal support [see: Can Tesla Avoid a Crash?]
We’ve updated the charts multiple times since then, working to stay ahead of Musk’s obvious attempts to manipulate the stock. The harmonic picture has been tricky due to the presence of two Point X’s which produces two different grids – the purple and the white.
TSLA dipped below the white .618 in March (and multiple times afterwards) bolstering the argument for the purple grid. But at times it has appeared that the white grid aligned nicely with channel lines such as this chart from last September which officially triggered a short call at 289 [see: Crypto Carnage] which was reiterated at 291 on April 3 [See: Can TSLA Survive This Crash?] and targeted 202.29.
The Better Late Than Never Department has notified me that TSLA just crashed into 202.29, nearing the completion of this particular leg of its journey.
Given that OPEX is in the rear view mirror and the futures are about to break below support again, we have to wonder whether TSLA is done.
continued for members… (more…)
Most of the rallies since our top call on Apr 30 have been followed by sharp sell-offs during the after-hours. This obviously makes it very difficult for trend followers who don’t trade in futures. But, it also smacks of insider/specialist positioning — sucking in those playing a rebound who are then stuck the following morning or the Monday following OPEX in a losing position. 
It reminds me of that great scene in Trading Places where Louis Winthorpe III (Dan Akroyd) and Billy Ray Valentine (Eddie Murphy) snooker the Duke brothers in the orange juice pit.
While yesterday’s action was apparently a headfake, it remains to be seen whether or not it represented a meaningful breakout. Again, it’s doubly hard to tell on OPEX.
continued for members… (more…)
After 2 1/2 weeks of a steady, orderly decline, stocks are poised to break out this morning. Is it another head fake, or does it represent an actual shift in direction?
Fortunately, the algo factors offer some important clues. The critical price level to watch is ES 2844.
continued for members… (more…)
Is this really, as Trump maintains, the “greatest economy ever?” Hardly. Sure, changes in the way that inflation and employment data are calculated/defined have allowed the government to report generally positive results. But, one needn’t dig far beneath the surface to realize that they not only don’t represent the real economy; they’re downright deceptive.
Because inflation data is baked into so much other economic data, it renders the whole lot of it suspect — not to mention inconvenient. Because inflation is vastly understated, some of the barometers that argue for dovish monetary policy are sending false messages. And, because unemployment is vastly understated, some of the barometers that argue for hawkish policy are sending false messages.
April advanced retail sales figures came in ugly.
The rest of the recent data wasn’t much better.
The market isn’t taking it well. S&P 500 futures are extending their losses and closing in on our key SMA200 target from Apr 30 [see: FOMC Endgame.]
continued for members… (more…)
As we wait for the broader indices to do a little fine tuning, it’s worth taking a quick look at some of the more bearish developments that probably weren’t part of the script.
First, AAPL broke down below its SMA200 yesterday to tag our 182.85 target. This, in addition to the channel breakdown, leaves it in a very precarious position. Only a single channel line stands in between it and another big drop. The only bounce which could save it at this point would be all the way back up past 193.
Then there’s BA, whichh tagged our 337.46 target yesterday. This tested a very important trend line from Feb 11 2016 which, if broken, would open the door to a critically important test at 325.
There other individual stocks worth watching. But, these are the two which deserve special scrutiny.
continued for members… (more…)
Though it is getting a little monotonous, I’ll never get tired of saying that we’re about to tag our next downside target.
The past two weeks of downside have been a great recruiting tool for chart patterns and this website in particular.
A note to prospective members…we’re currently offering auto-renew monthly subscriptions at half-off the first month. To sign up, CLICK HERE.
continued for members… (more…)
SPX needed about 22 points downside to reach the support of its SMA50, a rising channel bottom, and a falling channel bottom. ES, which finally reached our 2655 target from last week [see FOMC: Endgame] is currently off 30 points.
At this rate, SPX will breach its support on the open, especially if USDJPY doesn’t bounce here at its new lows.
Is it time for bulls to get nervous?
continued for members… (more…)
A little over a week ago, SPX pushed to new all-time highs. I had a hard time getting excited about the upside. From the Apr 29 update:
SPX has been melting up so long that I don’t think bears will rush for the exits if it tops 2940.91. In fact, we might see some selling come in if it’s taken as a marginal new high on a truncated 5th wave. Still, a move above the Sep highs is technically bullish. Trend followers will be compelled to go/stay long with the former highs as their stop. Personally, I would be very cautious in chasing it, keeping an eye out for rejection and shorting it if it drops back through 2940.
After giving up 100 points since the top, ES is again closing in on our next downside target — the intersection of two channel bottoms and the SMA50. 
Is this the end of the slide, or is there more to go?
This has been a very well-managed slide, with ES tagging the top and bottom of a clearly-defined channel nine times since then. While the talking heads sometimes get excited, the damage could have been much worse.
Consider BA, which is arguably in the fight of its life. Back on Mar 11, I charted the potential outcomes of the fallout from its MCAS disaster. The most obvious targets were the .500 Fib which would close a large gap at 369ish, the SMA200 at 358, and the .618 Fib at 351.12.
BA closed the gap easily enough, reaching 365.55 later that day. But, it took almost two months for it to finally tag the SMA200 — which it did yesterday. In fact, it even closed below the SMA200, suggesting that the .618 is also likely.
Since BA has a large and active share repurchase plan, I can venture a guess at who was keeping the stock afloat in the midst of some very unsettling headlines.
continued for members… (more…)
