• projecting significant write-downs of public sector liabilities, which amount to 27% of GDP
• total debt 173% of GDP
• rapid growth in off-balance sheet and non-bank loans
• 60%+ surge in property prices since YE 2006, yet many new projects unoccupied
• authorities’ efforts to cool property speculation might induce sharp correction
• real estate correction = more pressure on local govts, which rely heavily on land sale revenue
• Chinese bank stocks have fallen from 2.8 X book value in late 2010 to 1.6 X
• Property developers funding costs have shot up as high as 16% in offshore market
• Growth in sovereign CDS and renminbi put options reflects growing investor concern

source: CBO

Which, of course, just made me more curious.  All 6 of the remaining references to the article (which contained more than the title) simply linked back to the blog, but a few showed a snippet of the article that’s been withdrawn.

While the International Monetary Fund forecasts torrid 9.5% growth this year in China, the IMF is clearly getting a little more worried that China’s boom could turn to bust.  In the IMF’s Global Financial Stability Report, released on Wednesday morning [oops], economist Andre Meier assessed the risk of a banking crisis in China and is less than reassuring.  A huge expansion of credit in China since 2008 helped that country prosper despite the global financial crisis.  But that lending spree may produce “significant write downs” on debts by local governments, the IMF report says, citing private sector analysis.

If you go to the IMF’s website and search for Global Financial Stability Report, you’re told that it was just updated.  However, when you try to look inside the report, only Chapters 2 and 3 are available.  They’re interesting reading, but don’t touch on the China matters discussed in the excerpt above.

There’s a transcript and video of the press conference wherein the report is presented.  But, Chapter 1,  the one discussing China, isn’t presented.  Instead, there’s this cryptic note:

Way back on July 24, there was a lot of noise about NDX, and in particular AAPL, making new highs.  Some considered this a sure sign that the broader market would soon play catch-up and make new highs of its own.  In A Tale of Two Tops, I detailed why this wouldn’t happen.

A glance at the chart below tells the 2007 story.  NDX followed the same general pattern as SPX, but failed to spike as much in July.  Only in October did reluctant investors finally forget the past, bidding it up at a much faster clip than SPX.  Between its July and October peaks, for instance, SPX gained 20 points (1.2%).  In the same period, NDX gained 179 points (8.6%).

When SPX reached its all-time high on October 11, it was tired.  Twenty points in 3 months is a lot of effort for little reward.  But NDX, playing catch up, still had plenty of momentum — gaining another 108 points before finally peaking two weeks later on October 31 after making three higher highs in a row.

Many investors no doubt wondered, as NDX hit 2239 on Oct 31, whether SPX would join it in making a higher high.  It was only 27 points away from completing a massive Inverse Head & Shoulders pattern that might have sent it up 190 points.  Instead, SPX made its first lower high at 1553 (spitting distance from its first topping pattern high of 1556 on 7/19).  It would go on to make successive lower highs, eventually completing a traditional H&S; pattern and tumbling 58%.

In retrospect, NDX’s peak — coming two weeks after SPX’s — was a great indicator of bearish capitulation.   Understandably reluctant investors, by finally turning euphoric, marked the top in a way that would make Prechter proud.  The divergence between NDX’s higher high and SPX’s lower high was a great warning sign.

We then looked at the 2011 comparisons between NDX and SPX.   The divergence between three successive highs (NDX) and a potential H&S; (SPX) was striking.   It was one of several factors that convinced me that the top had been made two weeks prior [see: Merry Christmas and Pulling the Trigger] and that we’d already started down.

Big deal.  We already had the 250-pt plunge on SPX and 400-pt annihilation of NDX.  Ancient history.  Isn’t it?  (Regular readers know that all such questions are rhetorical, serving only as dramatic props;  irregular readers are on their own.)

I’ve blogged ad nauseum about the similarities between 2007 and 2011, as well as some very striking similarities between Feb-May 2011 and the past five weeks.

So… here’s another little chart worth considering.

TPTB would have us believe that Fed governors and Troiksters have things well in hand.   That in spite of impending defaults, trillions in debt, unending unemployment and plunging home prices, these will be the best of times for bulls.

Take a quick look at this rising wedge, completing a possible Butterfly pattern at the 1.272 Fib level (also possibly a Crab, which would have potential to the 1.618 at 2364.) 

If we back out a bit, it looks even better as a bearish Gartley that nailed its .786 Fib today.

In my opinion, this new high by NDX, combined with the all-time high for AAPL and significant weakness/divergence with SPX, is yet another clear sign of bearish capitulation.   Spring of hope or Winter of despair?   Stay tuned.

UPDATE:  3:50 PM

SPX bouncing on the non-news of Greece, etc.  Should be limited to the .786 of Friday’s Bat pattern at around 1210.50.

ORIGINAL POST:  2:45 PM

Friday’s Bat patterns are playing out nicely, with SPX down to within .45 of its .618 Fib level before getting a good bounce at the 10-day moving average.

A Bat pattern target is normally .618 of the DA retrace, meaning just below 1170.  The pattern .382 level at 1168.14 correlates nicely with the larger (since May 2 high) .236 Fib retrace at 1166.  I’m thinking it’s a reasonable level at which to rebound to the channel line one last time a la July 21.

Don’t expect a straight line, though, as Fed mania and stick save Euro zone conference calls will provide plenty of upside impetus.  A good target for today’s rebound:  the .382 Fib level (from the May 2 high) at 1205.1.

BTW, I normally don’t pay much attention to individual stocks, but a bellwether like AAPL is hard to ignore.  Recall it recently completed a Gartley pattern at 392.08.  Here’s the chart I posted on Aug 31.

Along with the Gartley on SPX, a neckline backtest on COMP and SMA 200 on NDX, it helped convince me to call 1230 the interim high.

We got a nice reversal almost immediately, retracing 26 points (.618) in the following three days.  Now, it’s back with a vengeance, hitting an all-time high of 411.82 just minutes ago.

Of course, in the process, it completed another bearish Crab pattern.  Crabapples, if you will.

It’s actually overshot the 1.618 ideal D point of 407.90.   So, the pattern could be busted.  Or, it could be it just got a little ahead of itself.

But, looking at the long term picture, there’s a rising wedge that’s clearly coming to a head.  If so, AAPL could end up spoiling the whole barrel.

More after the close.

ADDENDUM:  3:30 PM

Take a peek at the divergence on AAPL’s weekly chart.  Does the RSI have the juice to break through the TL?

UPDATE:  Sunday night

A quick update on our 2011 v 2007/8 comparison chart:

Here’s a close-up.  On Feb 27, 2008,SPX had climbed 120 points off the bottom (24 days) and was 8 points away from establishing a new higher high.  Instead, it fell 131 points over the next 13 trading days.

As of this past Friday, we have climbed 120 points off the bottom (27 days) and are 10 points away from establishing a new higher high.   If this doesn’t mean anything to you, go back up and read the last paragraph again.

A 130 point drop from here, BTW, would take us to 1090.  All we need is 1145, however, to complete the head and shoulders pattern discussed below with a 1040-1050 target.

And my last chart for the weekend — the comparison between the past 5 weeks and the overall 2011 topping pattern.   Eerily similar.

Some believe that Greece and EUR problems are baked into current prices, that we’ve seen the bottom.  I say the problems are just beginning to get much worse.   I think the only thing baked into prices is the belief that the Fed can wave its magic wand and bring back the bull.   I believe there will be a lot of disappointment in the weeks ahead.

I think the huge rally engineered over the past 5 weeks was a do or die effort by market makers to salvage their books after massive losses sustained in the 250-point plunge.  They got through OPEX alive, and will position themselves better in the coming leg down. 

ONE LAST COMPARISON…

Sorry,  couldn’t resist this one.  Maybe it’s nothing, but the bearish Bat pattern we completed Friday reminded me of similar patterns I’d seen on dates I consider equivalent.  The pattern shapes vary, but they all end with a .886 Fib retracement.  You decide.

Bat completed 9/16/2011

Bat completed Feb 26, 2008

Bat completed July 21, 2011

FRIDAY – EOD:

Long, long week for us bears.  But, the day went well.  And, next week should be a lot more fun.

As someone recently told me, you can’t make this stuff up (no matter how often I try.)   For instance, check out the 2 standard deviation regression channel from the Aug 9 low.

The 2nd line from the top is the +1 std dev line.  It landed at 1220 today.  As in…the high of the day.  This would be easy to ignore if not for the fact that such a channel guided the Feb – Jul 2011 top.  A final touch at the +1 std dev line on July 7 marked the beginning of the end.

 

 

UPDATE:  2:45 PM

A quick look at the big picture.  Check out the Big Red Line.  Looks like a backtest, no?

A closer look:

UPDATE:  12:50 PM

Very interesting Butterfly completing on Nasdaq 100 (NDX.)

The 5 year daily chart shows it’s backtesting a three-year trendline. 

UPDATE:  12:40 PM

SPX just a couple bucks from an intra-day Gartley completing.  The .786 is just over 1216.

UPDATE:  12:00 PM

ORIGINAL POST:  10:15 AM

SPX completed a Bat pattern at the .886 Fib level.  It’s not terribly well-formed, with point B being too high and C too low.  But, the .886 Fib retrace is right on the money.  It roughly corresponds to the +1 regression channel line (dates back to Aug 8) as well as Trend Line B that saved the bears’ bacon back on Aug 31 and Sep 1.

This rally has gone 30 points past the highest level I thought it was capable of; so, I call this the top with a great deal of trepidation.  However, similar reversal patterns are setting up across the market.

 

UPDATE:  EOD

I’ve redrawn the channel to include today’s market action.  The existing line (w/ shadows) would have accommodated yesterday’s rise, but not today’s.  Channels can and do shift all the time, but this one caught me off guard.

I believe the MCO indicator I discussed last night is still in play. The indicator has risen above +100, which is typically a reversal signal.

Also, a fan line that didn’t even earn a label the last time I drew these appears to have come to the bears’ rescue.  I’ll label it X for now.

I’m distressed (and poorer) at having called the top a few days early.  This same thing happened at the end of the Feb – July topping pattern.  On Jun 24, when seemingly everyone was calling for a flash crash, I called for a rally from 1267 to 1330 within the next 5 trading days.  It happened in 4.  I happily took my short position, only to see the market rally another 40 points before peaking.

In that case, too, the market rallied to the +1 regression channel line instead of the midline as I had been expecting (based on the 2007 analog.)  We are within a point or two of the midline right now.

If you’ve read my stuff for very long, you know that I’m usually early.  I’m not sure why.  But, I’ll spend this weekend thinking about the comparisons between this miss and the one from July 7.

Last, DX is only .17 from its 200-day moving average.  The .382 Fib level is only .19 below that.  I see absolutely no possibility that we won’t get a huge bounce off one of those important support levels.

In closing, we are going down.  OPEX (actually, quad-witching) might delay things a day or two.  But it will be soon, and it will make your head spin.

ORIGINAL POST:  2:20 PM

Apparently, the channel I’ve been expecting to hold this advance wasn’t up to the task.  I’m nominating a different candidate (the purple dashed line instead of the yellow.)

Compare it to the lines I drew on last night’s post for COMP. 

Here’s how it’s done so far today:

We’ll discuss more later.  Right now, I’m analyzing this Euro mess.

On a day when Marketwatch warns…

We first started this back on December 12, 2007.  From the NY Fed’s research publication Current Issues in Economics and Finance, Apr 23, 2010:

We took Euros and Swiss Francs and Japanese Yen and NZ Dollars that no one wanted and gave them US Dollars in exchange.  These central banks could loan these valuable greenbacks to their financial institutions who would (theoretically) lend them out to (theoretically) worthy borrowers — keeping liquidity alive and jumpstarting the economy.  It would also (theoretically) put a floor under the foreign currencies’ values and keep them viable in the global finance marketplace. 

Back then, financing had dried up because several large banks, investment banks and a hedge fund in insurance company clothing (AIG) had failed or were in the process of failing.  They were failing because of a newly developed but widely circulated idea that loans ought to be backed by adequate collateral.  Those that weren’t probably weren’t worth all that much.

Today, financing in the Euro zone has dried up because the Euro zone, itself, is in the process of failing.  Some foreign and Euro-based investors are convinced that making loans there is throwing good money after bad.  As I blogged a few days ago:

Deposits by financial institutions in Germany off 12% since Jan ’10, 24% since Sep ’08.  France, oddly, not as bad at 6% and 14%.  Italy off 1% in retail dep’s (serious money’s already gone), 13% ($100B) by financial insitutions.  In other words, banks don’t trust each other.

Fitch says US Money Market funds cut lending to Euro banks 20% in last 3 months (Germany-42%, French-18%, Spain and Italy 97%.)  At $1.5 Trillion, MMF’s are a vital source of funding. 

The ECB can’t make up for all that, but it’s trying.  Italy – EUR 85B in three months; Greek and Ireland – EUR 100B each in August; Portugal – EUR 46B in July; Spain – EUR 52B in July.  Total lending so far = 7X Euro zone central banks’ combined capital.

Total exposure in loans from other Euro countries to PIGS: $1.7 Trillion.  Lots more in guarantees and derivatives.  

Total swaps outstanding under the 2007 program peaked at $580 billion in December 2008.  At the time, this represented about 25% of the Fed’s total assets.  The program was officially terminated in February, 2010.  As the April 23 Fed article points out, market conditions had improved and financial strains had abated.

Two weeks later, on May 9, the Fed announced…

Apparently the system wasn’t quite ready to stop sucking the liquidity teat.  The ECB immediately drew down $5.5B, bumping that to $500B in both August and October 2010 and finally zeroing it out in March 2011.

All was fine until last month, when the Swiss National Bank unexpectedly drew down $200B.  It was followed the next week (Aug 24) by the ECB and another $500B.

Then, today’s news, and a 20-point SPX rally.  Is this really that great a development?  Let’s look at how both the dollar and the stock market performed following previous manipulations.

                                                                         SPX              DX

                       December 12, 2007                 1512              75.92
                       low/high next 3 days               1445              77.49
                       low/high next 35 days             1270              77.85

                        May 9, 2010                            1164              83.07
                        low/high next 3 day                1156              85.57
                        low/high next 30 days             1011              88.91

                        Aug 24, 2011                          1208              73.72
                        low/high next 3 day                1121              74.55
                        low/high next 35 days             1121              78.30
                                  (so far)

Bottom line, each intervention did diddly squat for stock investors.  Today’s rally isn’t justified. 

But, more importantly, we need to consider the more serious implications.  The Euro zone is obviously on life support.  The entire scheme is hanging by a thread, and we’ve been brought in to stitch it back together.  We, who just last month were in danger of defaulting on our own debt.

The Fed’s balance sheet, only $885 billion in Dec 2007, has ballooned to nearly $3 trillion.  And, every time we bail out another entity, whether it be Bank of America, General Motors or the ECB, we minimize the effect markets have on lending and borrowing and saving.  We impose a rationale which, in the long run, not only delays the inevitable but exponentially raises the stakes.

And, what happens when one of these sterling borrowers goes under?  The Fed article goes to great lengths to explain that we’re not taking crappy foreign loans as collateral.  No, we’re simply taking the currency backed by lenders who make the crappy foreign loans — loans that no lender in his right mind would make.  So much better, no?

The Fed Reserve article (published when the Fed thought the worst was behind us) details what happened the last time we did this. 

The McClellan Oscillator has been around for a while.  As Stockcharts.com says, it puts momentum in the AD line.  I first noticed a particular pattern while looking at the 2007 comparisons to 2011 in SPX.

In short, when the indicator bounces sharply higher after a distinct low, draw a trend line that connects the low to the subsequent dips.  When it breaks that trend line, there’s a pretty good chance we’re putting in a high.

It works best when the starting point is relatively low, say -200, the number of touches is 3 or more,  the shape of the indicator is very convex relative to the trend line, and the indicator makes it to +200 or so.

When each of these conditions is met, I’ve yet to see an instance where it didn’t result in a pretty healthy drop.

Here are a few examples from the past five years using COMP.

Dec 07

Nov & Dec 09

Jun 10

And, the latest examples…  Note the most recent case corresponds to the Aug 31 interim high.  The previous one belongs to the Jul 8 high, which I view as the beginning of the end of the latest bull market.

In both cases, the market high was quickly followed by another slightly lower high that registers as a (post-trend line break) lower peak on the MCO indicator.  It typically comes in at around 100.

Jul and Sep 2011

In many previous cases, it’s this second, lower high which marks the start of the most dramatic phase of the downturn.  It was certainly true in 2007 and in Jul 2011.

I’ve thrown a few other goodies in that last chart.  I’ve drawn in another way of looking at the downward sloping channel.  Beginning with the pattern high, it intersects with a horizontal support line which also happens to be the broken neckline for the gigantic head & shoulders pattern that just played out.

Here’s the view from 20,000 feet.  Note that the three upward sloping TL’s are actually fan lines originating at the Mar 09 lows.  The old adage with fan lines is “three strikes and you’re out” which means, the next drop below a fan line will be the most memorable.

Fan Lines

So, where does SPX stand with all this?

Should be a memorable next few days.