pebblewriter

Tag: USDJPY

  • Just Two Charts

    Two charts best define the day we had yesterday.

    First, VIX tagged our next highest target: the intersection of the .786 Fibonacci retracement and the trend line connecting two previous highs.

    The other one was the SPX arithmetic (as opposed to log) chart, which stopped on a dime at the channel bottom.The bleeding continued well past the Fed’s ineffectual $1.5 trillion injection and had to wait until the low-volume aftermarket to be staunched. At that point, central bankers went to work – pumping oil and gas, the dollar, interest rates and currencies in order to restore confidence whip up the algos. It worked…at least so far.

    I’ll have a separate post up later regarding COVID-19, including my latest projections for the US.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Storm Finally Arrives

    After weeks of gathering clouds, the storm we’ve been watching has finally arrived. S&P futures are lock limit down just a few points above our next downside target.

    Not surprisingly, all of our other targets across currencies, commodities and fixed income have either tagged or exceeded our next downside targets, with more to go once the cash market opens.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Burning Down the House

    Once upon a time, a few boys whose families owned the biggest lemon groves in town got together and opened up a lemonade stand. It was a very hot summer, so they sold an enormous amount of ice-cold lemonade. Since they controlled the supply of lemons, they were able to quickly raise prices from 10 cents per glass to as much as $1.50. Their customers didn’t mind as they could afford 1.50, it was excellent lemonade, and there were no alternatives. They like it so much, in fact, they invested $2 trillion in shares of the stand.

    One day a freak storm hit town, and the temperature dropped from 95 to 25 degrees in a matter of hours. The weatherman said it could last for months. Not many people were interested in ice-cold lemonade, even though the boys frantically dropped their prices. They even tried cutting back on the amount of lemonade they made. For some reason, this had no effect on sales, and prices continued to drop. A few boys split away from the group and tried selling cheaper lemonade on their own, but this further depressed prices. Soon, the lemonade stand went out of business. The end.

    And that, boys and girls, is how OPEC came to be in their current predicament.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Decision Time, Again

    We start this morning’s post with a peek at the Russell 2000 as it perfectly illustrates the dilemma facing the broader markets this morning.

    Up until September 2017, RUT followed a well-defined rising channel shown below in yellow.  Like all channels, it was defined by the tops and bottoms along the way. The only problem: The channel was rising only about 5% per year – hardly enough to get excited about. By late 2016, it had become obvious that algos had more influence than discretionary, fundamentally-oriented investors. The algos were, in turn, influenced by certain factors which central banks and their proxies could usually control quite easily.  By wagging the tail (the factors) the whole dog (the market) would usually fall in line.

    In September 2017, after RUT had been bumping up against the top of the rising yellow channel for over 9 months, the factors went to work and RUT  broke out of the yellow channel and rose 21% over the next year. The slope of the new rising white channel was good for about 20% per year.

    Everything was going well until September 2018 when RUT topped out at 1742 and plunged 27% in only three months. To make matters worse, the new rising white channel broke down and RUT fell back below the top of the yellow channel from which it had broken out.

    It spent the better part of the next year trying to break out of the yellow channel again – failing seven times until Dec 4, 2019, when it finally shot above the channel top and remained there. There was a scare last month when, on Jan 31, it successfully backtested the channel top and bounced 5.5%.

    Given yesterday’s carnage, though, it has fallen back to the top of the yellow channel where it faces that same important test all over again.  If it holds, all is well and investors can go back to mindless trend following.

    Even if it doesn’t, the SMA200 is now up to 1574, a modest 3.3% below yesterday’s close. But dropping through 1616ish would mean breaking down below the horizontal support (which served as overhead resistance between Oct 2018 and Dec 2019.) It could accelerate losses and complicate the rescue mission.RUT is typical of many of the indices and individual equities I chart every day. The Dow, for instance, faces a similar test at 27,700.And, SPX and ES completed important backtests (the purple channel top below) in the process of tagging our next downside targets yesterday.Given the way the factors are behaving this morning, there is a good possibility that we’ll see additional backtest targets such as DJIA 27,700 tested today. But, that would mean taking a chance on the algos’ ability to rescue stocks from some very risky waters.

    Stay tuned.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • When Will News Begin to Matter Again?

    Apparently AAPL slashing guidance is inconsequential and Bill Gates, who is predicting 10 million deaths, is some sort of conspiracy theorist – because the market continues to ignore the coronavirus story. Perhaps somewhere down the line the investing world will come to realize what we’ve known for years: stocks have become increasingly easy to manipulate.

    Lately, it has been VIX’s constant smackdowns below various measures of support and the perennial games played with currencies which have directed algos to buy every dip.  With oil and EURUSD having reached important downside targets, the formula might change somewhat. But, at what point will the game be obvious to all?

    Futures are off about 15 points, not even 1/2% after a slew of dreadful headlines over the weekend.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Wuhan Coronavirus: Still Here

    In a stunning demonstration of the extent to which algos control the market, ES soared 56.50 points after the World Health Organization declared the Wuhan coronavirus a public health emergency of international concern.

    While it’s true the press conference felt more like a China tourism promo, the declaration in no way reduced the risk the virus poses. Nor did it reduce the potential economic risk or stock market downside.

    ES came to its senses after the close, reversing at its SMA10 and dropping back through its SMA20. If today weren’t the last day in January, a month clinging to a positive return for posterity’s sake, we would have seen the next leg down already.Meanwhile, we have scads of economic data coming out at 8:30 and earnings galore to digest.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Just When You Thought it was Safe…

    The downside scenario triggered when S&P futures reached our upside target on Jan 22…

    …is playing out very nicely indeed.

    Credit VIX, which uncharacteristically didn’t collapse last night……and CL which, having come close to our 51.62 target on Sunday, is taking another gander.Needless to say, our downside targets remain unchanged.

    BTW, Boston folks, I’ll be downtown today and Friday. Drop me a line if you’d like to meet up.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • FOMC Day: Jan 29, 2020

    Futures are higher this morning on what is expected to be a non-event FOMC announcement and press conference. I suspect attention will again return to currencies, as the US dollar’s surge over the past month, combined with the big drop we had anticipated in oil and gas, will serve to tamp down inflation fears.  Of course, there’s a fine line between falling inflation fears and growing deflation fears.The bond market continues to reinforce the bearish case for stocks.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • The Snoozefest Continues

    All the bullish factors which have kept stocks aloft the past two sessions are still going at it.  Hence, the futures’ snoozefest even as Trump is about to be impeached.The only potential fly in the ointment remains oil and gas, which have reached an important decision point.

    continued for members… (more…)

  • Inflation Games

    Inflation drives interest rates. Though the Fed probably wishes it didn’t, it’s an inconvenient truth.  There are much tighter correlations, but consider the strong positive correlation between CPI and 10Y notes.

    This matters, of course, because with $22 trillion in debt, the US faces the same problem as the ECB and Japan: High interest rates on rising debt levels (the blue bars below) would lead to insolvency.  The slight increase in average interest rates (the black line) between 2018 and 2019, for instance, sent interest expense (the red line) soaring.

    There are only two ways to keep interest expense from consuming untenable slices of the budget: cut back on spending or bring interest rates back down and keep them down. Since the government isn’t likely to cut spending any time soon, this means focusing on interest rates.

    Japan and the ECB have coped with runaway debt by manipulating rates below zero — negative interest rates where you pay the government money to borrow from you. Though not there yet, the US is on the same path, seen most notably lately in the repo market through Not-QE.

    The government plays lots of games with inflation.  There are many different definitions, some of which include or exclude different expenses such as food, gas prices and rent. Although just as flawed as any, I like good old-fashioned CPI as it includes food and gas prices — things that affect the budget of almost every American and is factored into many important calculations such as cost of living increases.

    CPI can be influenced in some very predictable ways, some of which are subject to manipulation such as oil and gas prices.  Without harping on geopolitical considerations [see: Coincidences and Consequences] all over again, it’s obvious that the Fed’s effort to keep interest rates low is dependent on keeping inflation under control which, in turn, is dependent on keeping the annual change in gas prices under control.  How so?

    CPI (which, remember, is a measure of the rate of change in prices) has averaged +1.74% through October 2019, while YoY changes in the price of gas have averaged -6.79%. Months such as January and February, when CPI registered 1.55% and 1.52%, corresponded with the largest YoY drops in gas prices: -13.05% and -10.65%.  In April, the only positive YoY change in gas prices (+1.58%) produced the highest CPI measure of the year: 2.0%.

    The chart below illustrates the relationship so far in 2019 which simple regression analysis reveals is:

    CPI = (0.0263 x YoY change in gas prices) + 0.01918.

    In November, the rate of change in gas prices was only -3.16%. All else being equal, this suggests CPI will come in around 1.84% – a modest uptick. However, the first reading in December (unless gas prices fall) would indicate a 9.8% YoY increase in gas prices and a CPI reading of +2.18% or greater.

    That, folks, is why the Fed is considering formal changes to the way it evaluates inflation as (not) detailed in the official gobbledygook offered last month. It also explains the various comments made by Fed officials – first suggesting that inflation should target a range rather than a specific level (i.e. 2.0%) and more recently suggesting that inflation should be allowed to “run hot.”

    As the Financial Times reported:

    The Federal Reserve is considering introducing a rule that would let inflation run above its 2 per cent target, a potentially significant shift in its interest rate policy.

    The Fed’s year-long review of its monetary policy tools is due to conclude next year and, according to interviews with current and former policymakers, the central bank is considering a promise that when it misses its inflation target, it will then temporarily raise that target, to make up for lost inflation…

    If the Fed adopts this so-called “make-up strategy”, it would mark the biggest shift in how it carries out its interest rate policy since it began to target 2 per cent inflation in 2012.

    Most economists would probably suggest that the Fed has been working hard over the years to get inflation up to 2%. I strongly disagree and believe the Fed has used the constant shortfalls as the primary rationale for accommodative monetary policy – the purpose of which is to keep interest rates low and support equity prices.

    This latest prevarication is intended to provide cover for the fact that oil and gas prices have been propped up in the lead up to the Aramco IPO.  Now that the IPO is in the rear view, we’ll find out whether central banks can really stomach 2.2% CPI or gas prices are about to tumble a good 6-8%.

    If the past is any indication, the Fed won’t take a chance on CPI over 2.0% and we’ll see oil and gas prices drop substantially over the next couple of weeks. The White House wouldn’t complain, especially if it helps keep interest rates low.

    If I’m wrong, and inflation heads back above 2% (remember, the next tariff is scheduled to arrive on Monday) then we face bigger problems in January (when December CPI is reported.) I’ll post oil and gas price targets below the break.

    Meanwhile, it’s Tuesday and futures were off substantially overnight, so of course there’s news on the trade front – particularly in light of the impeachment goings on.  S&P futures have spiked 25 points off their overnight lows, but have yet to break out of the falling white channel that leads to a 3.5% correction.

    continued for members… (more…)