Peak Oil: A Follow-Up

Oil just tagged our next downside target at 44.10.  It’s been almost four weeks since we called the top on CL [see: Welcome to Peak Oil.]  CL has since fallen over 14%.  And, while it’s been a great short, its influence on SPX has been almost as impressive: a 4% drop (the thin purple line below.)2016-11-04-cl-v-spx-0600Unfortunately for equities, oil’s drop isn’t finished — not by a long shot.

continued for members

For starters, there’s a SMA200 down below at 43.31.  And, that doesn’t even begin to resolve the inflation problem.  2016-11-04-cl-daily-0600As we detailed in Watching and Waiting, the follow up to Peak Oil, CL must get back down below 30 in order not to have a big impact on headline inflation figures.  Using a back of the envelope calculation, if a 14% drop in CL produces a 4% drop in SPX, then another 32% drop in CL could produce a 190-pt drop in SPX.

But, is that likely?  It depends.  SPX and ES are both likely to tag their own SMA200s this morning.  If the slide that began on Aug 15 is to be arrested, this is the obvious support.  From yesterday’s close:2016-11-03-spx-daily-1258

Everybody and their mother will be looking for a bounce here.  As we discussed yesterday, it’s also the 1.618 extension of the small, purple harmonic pattern.  But, to assume it’s the bottom, one would have to ignore the other, more prominent harmonic patterns, not to mention a large channel dating back to 2009. 2016-11-04-spx-weekly-0652Its bottom is currently at 1965, which is only slightly higher than the purple .618 at 1956.68.2016-11-04-spx-daily-0715

Note, however, that the yellow channel charter above is only half of the channel from 2009 that actually connects the 666 lows.  Its bottom is currently closer to 1675, though they could limit it to another (5th) tag of 1823 by dragging it out until October 2017.

2016-11-04-spx-expanded-0652

BTW, ES is coming up on its SMA200 at 2077.72 and SPX’s is 2082.29.  Both should need to tag theirs in order for the interim bottom to take.  Of course, with everyone planning on buying the dip, it’ll probably take an act of congress (more likely, CL dropping below its SMA200) to effect the tags.

What could drive SPX that much lower?  The biggest risk, IMO, is a departure from easy money policy.  The second biggest risk is a disappearance of carry trade vehicles.

According to Trump, the Fed has created a “false economy” and an “artificial stock market.”  He has said Janet Yellen “should be ashamed of herself.”  Suffice it to say, there would likely be a shake up in the Fed’s policies if Trump were elected.

Another possibility, though even more remote, is that the Fed starts taking inflation seriously and begins normalizing interest rates.  What goes up due to easy money, must come down — or, so the theory goes.

As far as carry trades go…if CL drops out of the running, the most obvious candidate to take over again is the USDJPY.  Recall that it broke out of the falling channel it’s been in since Oct 2015 back on Oct 4.  2016-11-04-usdjpy-daily-0755But, lately, the yen’s been strengthening on the apparent lack of interest by the BoJ in expanding its QQE.  It looks more likely to backtest the red channel, or at least the white Flag Pattern bottom at 100.7 than it does push up to new highs.

However, NKD is going to be testing support again, soon.  After recently reversing at the .886 at 17499 as expected, it has a 5-6% buffer before the rising white channel bottom is in danger.2016-11-04-nkd-daily-0840

Here’s the bigger picture:2016-11-04-nkd-v-usdjpy-0844

Bottom line, there’s room to the downside — as evidenced by DX’s chart.2016-11-04-dx-daily-0600But, it won’t be long before the BoJ starts getting nervous enough to rev up the printing presses again.

UPDATE:  12:33 PM

SPX just tagged its SMA5 200.  If it’s going to tag the SMA200, this is the place for it to turn. If you’re not still holding short from earlier this week, 2098.48 is your entry point — with tight stops.2016-11-04-spx-5-0931

For those keeping an eye on DB, there’s a clear path to 12.85 – 13.05 today.2016-11-04-db-5-1152

UPDATE:  2:55 PM

Finally breaking down?  We still have a shot at 2082.29 by 3:34PM…2016-11-04-spx-5-1155UPDATE:  3:31 PM

Almost there.  As always, hold short over the weekend only if you can hedge or handle the gap risk.  Otherwise, we’ll see how low we can ride it before the bell.

2016-11-04-spx-5-1231

Comments

10 responses to “Peak Oil: A Follow-Up”

  1. Vadim Avatar
    Vadim

    Take profit today, or stay short through the weekend? To me, it looks like there is much more downside and little potential for a bounce on Monday.. but I could be missing something..

  2. Wade Avatar
    Wade

    As we move towards the weekend, I am giving a lean to holding over the weekend. With SPX not tagging 2082 today to set a bottom, what are your thoughts it happens early next week?

    1. pebblewriter Avatar

      The day’s not over just yet… But, if it doesn’t tag the SMA200 today, the odds favor a tag next week. There’s no guarantee, of course, as we’ve had several near misses over the years.

      1. Wade Avatar
        Wade

        Of course. Thanks for the great week! You’re the man!

      2. Vadim Avatar
        Vadim

        Thanks, that pretty much answers my question too. And great call on 2098.48 short!

  3. Vadim Avatar
    Vadim

    Why did oil pop so suddenly??

    1. aaronishii Avatar
      aaronishii

      Saudis threatened to pump more oil. Rumor by they that cannot be named claiming Saudis denied threat getting cl and thus spx to pop. Saudis deny the denial and cl drops, spx fading but desired effect achieved.

      1. Vadim Avatar
        Vadim

        Ah, usual “oil rumor” circus.

  4. TommyYiu Avatar
    TommyYiu

    PW, regarding your points in CL, I have a question. Early this year, CL dropped to $26 and SPX suffered heavily as a result.

    TPTB would take note on that effect. Why would TPTB allow a repeat of oil crash like that? (your post: “if a 14% drop in CL produces a 4% drop in SPX, then another 32% drop in CL could produce a 190-pt drop in SPX.”)

    Thank you!

    1. pebblewriter Avatar

      If they don’t, they end up with inflation on their hands, which would require higher interest rates — which would have the same effect on stocks as letting CL drop. Damned if they do, damned if they don’t — unless they can find a substitute.