One Down, Two to Go

It’s been a while since we had a membership promotion.  We’ll make this one quick and easy.  The first 5 folks who sign up for an annual membership at the discounted price of $1,200 will receive get a $600 rebate off the first year’s membership.  Net cost in year one: $600, just $50/month. 

I’ll update the membership page after the close.  If the rebate still shows available, then the deal is still on.  Don’t delay, as this deal is for a limited time.  Tomorrow, the rebate will be reduced to $500; then, $400 on Friday, etc.  CLICK HERE to sign up.

*  *  *  *  *

SPX should reach our 2065 target on this morning’s opening.  All it took was some soothing words from ChairDove Yellen and, of course, a well-timed 3.5% rally in CL.  It’s breaking out of the falling channel it’s been in since Mar 17, but that’s not important.  And, it probably won’t even last.  It doesn’t even need to.

2016-03-30 CL 60 0615Because, before it does, SPX will have been shoehorned past major overhead resistance.  I had to go back to Feb 22 to find my first mention of it.  From Cornered Bankers Resort to Ramping:

Once the SMA50 is topped, the upside case shifts to the purple .618/SMA100 combo at 1999, followed by the white channel top and purple .786 at 2050 in late March.  An alternate target is the .786 of the drop from 2134 to 2010 at 2065.  Either is legitimate, but 2065 means SPX will have broken out of the white channel – which is, of course, the path central planners have in mind.

2016-02-22 SPX daily 0615

There are only two more of these obstacles to go before SPX can hope to reach all-time highs.  Could fundamentals get in the way?  Absolutely.  But, not if the central planners play their cards right.

continued for membersSPX will depart the falling white channel that has guided the lows exceptionally well for the past year.  The highs…not so much.

2016-03-30 SPX daily 0600 chnlsThe yellow .786 at 2065.25 is the key level to hold — and, SPX should easily reach it today.  Once the white channel is a thing of the past (and, assuming it survives a backtest or whatever backlash might await it) then the falling purple channel is the next obstacle.

The yellow .886 at 2097.71 intersects with the purple channel top in the next two weeks.  And, after that, 2135 awaits.

Note that USDJPY bottomed out at the red channel midline and is in the midst of a strong rebound.2016-03-30 USDJPY 60 0615UPDATE:  9:32 AM

There’s the yellow .786.  We could get a backtest of the broken white channel for those looking for a short-term trade.  But, USDJPY and CL are showing no signs of falling off just yet, so I’d be leery of shorting.  If you do, very tight stops are in order.  And, as always, watch CL like a hawk.2016-03-30 SPX 5 0632The white 1.618 is up above at 2077.68, and it intersects with the red channel top.  There’s at least a 50:50 chance that SPX heads up and tags it before pausing much.

UPDATE:  9:40 AM

SPX has pushed past the .786 and is waiting for the MAs to catch up.  CL is also pausing here.   SPX might level off or backtest the .786, but I think it’ll try to defend it.  A potential turning point: when ES reaches its .786 at 2063.  It should equate to about SPX 2071.50.2016-03-30 CL 5 0639 2016-03-30 SPX 5 06392016-03-30 ES 5 0639UPDATE:  9:51 AM

ES just reached its .786, so I’d take a short position here as a ST trade back to 2066.  Tight stops are advised, as it might well wait for the SMAs to arrive first.2016-03-30 SPX 5 0651 2016-03-30 CL 5 0651 2016-03-30 ES 5 0651UPDATE:  9:06 AM

They’re being very cautious with that .786 Fib.  Whiel CL tagged and backed off its SMA10, USDJPY has found support from its.  2016-03-30 USDJPY 5 0805 2016-03-30 CL 5 0808UPDATE:  11:34 AM

That’s probably close enough.  I’d cover the short here and go long.  CL has backtesting a TL from yesterday’s lows and the SMA5 200, so we should get a bounce here.  My only hesitation is ES, which looks like it’s not quite done.  The SMA5 200 beckons at 2054ish.  Also, CL could be aiming lower as well.  The red TL at 38.4 is the next major support.

2016-03-30 SPX 5 0833 2016-03-30 CL 5 0833UPDATE:  12:17 PM

Coming up on an important level as ES/SPX backtest broken TLs and CL is trying to break out of the white channel again.  Mind your stops.

If SPX should drop back through the rising SMA5 50 now at 2063.52, then a white channel top backtest is possible (2053ish.)  I suspect the goal is to get an actual SMA5 200 tag for ES at 2054.5.0, but we’ll see.

2016-03-30 CL 5 0916 2016-03-30 ES 5 0916 2016-03-30 SPX 5 0916UPDATE:  12:39 PM

Here’s the test: ES, the white channel (from Feb 11) midline and SMA5 200, CL its SMA20, USDJPY its TL from this morning, and SPX kinda hanging in the wind.  If it doesn’t rebound from here, time to short.2016-03-30 USDJPY 5 0938 2016-03-30 CL 5 0938 2016-03-30 SPX 5 0938 2016-03-30 ES 5 0938UPDATE:  1:06 PM

This could easily be a head fake, but ES and USDJPY are breaking down.  And, CL just dropped through the SMA20.  So, I’m obliged to follow their lead and short here for 2052.71 — the white channel backtest at the white .886.  It would also close this morning’s gap and set a nice trap for bears who are playing the earlier reversal from the yellow .786 at 2065.25. 2016-03-30 SPX 5 10052016-03-30 ES 5 1007 2016-03-30 USDJPY 5 1007 2016-03-30 CL 5 1007UPDATE:  2:51 PM

While this is probably a head fake to wash out weak shorts, I’m nervous about it getting away from us.

SPX is again paying more attention to a CL bounce than the USDJPY dip.  CL’s SMA5 50 will arrive at the red channel line backtest around 3:00 — probably the turning point if there’s going to be one.  Wouldn’t be surprised if they’re just trying to delay a backtest of 2052 until a gap down tomorrow morning, forcing a “short overnight” decision.

2016-03-30 USDJPY 5 1151 2016-03-30 CL 5 1151 2016-03-30 SPX 5 1150UPDATE:  3:02 PM

Okay, I give up.  Looks like ES is determined to close at its VWAP at 2058ish.  Back to cash, though I’d gladly go short if CL would reverse or USDJPY would plunge more forcefully.2016-03-30 SPX 5 12012016-03-30 USDJPY 5 1201 2016-03-30 CL 5 1201 2016-03-30 ES 5 1201UPDATE:  3:42 PM

It’s almost certainly a head fake as far as the next 20 minutes, but I’d want to be short on any sustained drop through 2065.25.  If they hold these prices into the close, I expect a gap down to tag 2052 or 2056 in the morning. But, as always, shorting overnight only makes sense if you can hedge or keep a close eye on it.2016-03-30 SPX 5 12412016-03-30 USDJPY 5 1241 2016-03-30 CL 5 1241UPDATE:  3:55 PM

Looks like it’s not going to break down during trading hours.  But, again, I’d short here if you can handle the overnight risk.2016-03-30 SPX 5 1255

Comments

6 responses to “One Down, Two to Go”

  1. Brian Avatar
    Brian

    sorry if this is a newbie question… but which study does the CL SMA20 come from? I see the dashed white line on the chart, but what time frame is the SMA20 study on?

    1. pebblewriter Avatar

      no worries. When I chart in time frames other than daily, I usually indicate the daily SMAs with a dashed horizontal line. It moves a little during the day, of course, but this is the value as of first thing in the morning for futures and currency pairs, and the previous day’s close for SPX. BTW, the color scheme is 10/red, 20/white, 50/blue, 100/yellow, and 200/thicker red.

  2. ChristopherEllis Avatar
    ChristopherEllis

    IMHO that may have been it…If POMO was the old gas to light the flame, now it’s buybacks. With most companies entering the buyback blackout period there probably isn’t enough juice to go higher. Shorting Jan 1 to Feb 15, Long Feb 15 to today (look at what the frontrunners did Dec 29-31), short today theough May 15 and then back long. I think you can play this buyback game the rest of the year. Or just keep doing what you’re doing, Pebble 🙂 Thanks for the hard work

    1. pebblewriter Avatar

      Thanks for your thoughts, CE. I’d like to agree with you and am completely open to a more serious drop here. Just been burned way too many times by the CBs levering things up over resistance then defending the (now) support with whatever it takes. If I were in charge of the Fed manipulation desk, this is exactly what I would have done — only would have allowed the SMA200 backtest last week to give the whole thing more legitimacy to the charting crowd. That’s the problem with the central planners: their tools are pretty much blunt force, and there’s not much ability to fine tune or force backtests when it’s obvious what their end game is.

      1. ChristopherEllis Avatar
        ChristopherEllis

        Totally understood. I’ve been following you from way back when and you’ve taught me more about the market than anyone else, but I do diverge from your philosophy just a bit when it comes to the CBs. I actually don’t think they control the market quite as much as we give them credit for, otherwise we would never get the sharp plunges we have here, in Japan, Europe and China. I look at them as the trust fund baby with a lot of money and no idea what to do with it. I actually think it is the big hedgies and prop desks that control things. To me the proof of that is the carrot and stick game they play with the CBs – Janet talks dovish she gets a pat on the head with a market run-up, Fed starts talking to hawkish we get a plunge until they panic. I don’t think that would be happening if the CBs were in control. If you think of every move in the market being a signal to the Fed for more free money I think it all makes a lot more sense. That said, even the big boys need kindling to make the market move 10-15% and buybacks are the big, dumb buyer of last resort so they essentially have no risk when the massive buybacks we have now are in play. Anyway, just my thoughts and thanks for pointing out 2065 – you saved ne quite a bit of money between 2050 and there. Cheers

        1. pebblewriter Avatar

          First, thanks for the compliment. I’ve learned a lot in writing this blog, and am every glad that it’s been valuable to you over the years. Warms my heart!

          I agree that the CBs probably don’t drive many of the moves we see every day. For instance, there are no doubt many oil companies, banks, sovereigns, etc that also influence the oil futures markets which, lately, have been so influential. Ditto for currency pairs, bond futures, etc. If I were a $20 billion prop desk or hedgie, I’d absolutely be looking at cheap, easy methods by which to protect my portfolio when the “market” starts going against me. Driving up CL with a well-timed CL purchase could easily save you 10-100X your cost of intervention.

          If you believe Zerohedge, the FOMC directs hedge funds to trade on its behalf to stabilize stocks with VIX and treasury futures, probably currencies too. Other CBs such as BoJ and the SNB openly invest directly in equities, currencies and commodities.

          As far as control, it’s illusory isn’t it? I think CBs try to influence things as best they can, but once in a while it gets out of hand. In such cases, Bullard or Yellen goes on TV and tells investors what they want to hear and everything is okay again. It has completely warped the markets and will no doubt lead to greater problems down the road. But, they’ve painted themselves into a corner and probably have no choice at this point.

          Very happy to hear I saved you some money over the past month. Please spread the word!