UPDATE:  12:40 PM PDT

The rally looks to be almost done, with SPX giving up almost all its gains and back to 1318.  We’ve completed a rounding top here, but could complete a larger one if the drop continues to 1313 — where we started the day. 

If, as I expect, it breaks out to the downside, the target is 1295.

http://thepatternsite.com/roundingtop.html

UPDATE:  10:30 AM PDT

Watching the /DX, which fell pretty hard during BB’s comments.  It seems to have been an overreaction to the possibilities of QE3.  We went down and tagged the 10, 20 and 50 SMAs, are bouncing back now.  I continue to think we’re backtesting the falling wedge breakout and will see the move up continue to at least the 77.5 area by the end of the week.

UPDATE:  8:45 AM PDT

Divergence setting up on Gold intra-day charts.  Could be topping right about here.

SPX appears to have peaked at 1331.48.  Will load more shorts here.

ORIGINAL POST:  7:00 AM PDT

Opened up this morning in what seems to be a corrective wave for the 5 fives down from last Thursday’s 1356 interim high.  We’re also likely bouncing off the 50 SMA at 1314.63.

I don’t think this is the larger bounce we’re expecting, as that would ideally start from lower levels — perhaps 1300 or so.  But, anything is possible.  If so, key resistance would be at the 78.6% Fib, also marking a TL down, at 1346.50.

But, for now, key resistance includes the channel top/trend line down from 1356 and, more importantly, the regression channel midline and 61.8% Fib level — both at about 1327.

Key Moving Averages:

3 EMA:      1321.88
10 SMA:    1329.60
20 SMA:    1304.52
50 SMA:    1314.63
200 SMA:  1275.03

The 20 is below the 50, which is bearish.  The 3 also moved below the 10, which is bearish.  The next piece of the puzzle for bears would be for the 10 to cross beneath the 20, which likely won’t happen for a few days.

I suspect all eyes will be on Bernanke’s testimony before Congress today.  Key indicator?  The sheen on his forehead and the quiver of his upper lip as he figures out how to put a positive spin on “we’re screwed” — the abbreviated version of “I took $600 billion to fix the economy and all I brought back is this lousy t-shirt.”

More later.

I’ve been watching the dollar’s patterns for months, and yesterday we broke out of a falling wedge that’s been in the works for ages.

We’ve made many attempts before, but back in late April we started forming a rising channel that’s been guiding us directly to this spot.

With the weakness in the Euro and flight to safety (ironic, no?), the “mighty” US dollar finally broke out of the wedge, spiking to 77.175 before falling back to  76.38 as of 9:30AM PDT.

While a fall back to the channel bottom is possible, I think we’re currently backtesting the falling wedge.  I expect this pullback to run out of steam by 75.97 (the circle above) and /DX to begin a strong move up.   Though, its possible the turn will come sooner.  Looking at the intra-day chart, there’s a small falling wedge that looks just about played out.

From a fundamental standpoint, the Fed finds itself locked into a tough position, unable to print money at the same pace as before.  At the same time, the Euro’s troubles are bound to get much worse.  We’re probably not far behind them (if at all); but, for the time being, there are no good alternative safe havens to the USD — currently 60% of global reserves.

I know, Gold bugs will argue otherwise.  And, I’m pooh-poohing that idea in the medium/long term.  It’s probably a good investment to hold, even as just a hedge.  But, the other strong currencies are not available in sufficient amounts to act as a global reserve at this point.

My favorite is the CHF, for instance, but there’s only 50BB of it out there — .1% of all global reserves. The Euro makes up about 26%.  The Pound Sterling and Yen are only about 4% each.  And, does anyone really believe the world is ready to embrace the Renminbi?  It may eventually happen, but not anytime soon.  Like it or not, the world is stuck with the USD…for now.

When the dollar does finish backtesting, it’ll be a sure-fire chicken/egg signal that equity markets are ready to roll over for good.   It could happen as early as this afternoon, so it bears a very close eye.

EOD COMMENT:  10:30 PM PDT

Nothing much to add at this point.  Many of the 60 minute charts look like they’re about to roll over to the bearish side — VIX, SPX, RUT, etc.   Most of the 60-minute charts also feature 10, 20 and 50 SMA’s in a bearish configuration, while the daily charts are getting there, with a 10 day still above the 20, but the 20 below the 50.  The 3 EMA crossed the 10 SMA today, and that’s an excellent bearish signal (once confirmed.)

Still looking for a bounce, possibly at the 50 SMA at 1315, but more likely the -1 std deb regression channel line, which coincides with the .382 Fib at about 1301.  We should continue to see /DX gains, as the situation in Greece, Ireland and Italy continue to concern investors.  Will this be 2011’s Lehman Bros?

UPDATE:  11:20 AM PDT

Just hit 1327, which is the channel midline AND the .618 fib level — a logical top for the day.  The /DX did a swan dive following release of the Fed minutes, but seems to have caught itself at the bottom of the falling wedge — which I’m now broadening.  Doesn’t change the bigger picture, but it buys dollar bears (and stock bulls) a little more time.

UPDATE:  7:55 AM PDT

Confusing situation.  The move I was expecting down to the -1 std dev line on the regression channel happened perfectly — but in the futures overnight (1296 on /ES).  The bounce back was supposed to be to the midline (1325 on /ES, 1326 on SPX).  But, we’re just shy of that now.  I think the algo’s are wondering if a dip in the futures “counted” or not. 

If we get back above 1325, I’ll be looking for additional short entry positions.  But, I think there is likely to be another, larger bounce on the way down — maybe at 1300 still — to take the place of the one that didn’t happen in the cash markets.   Just be aware that a bigger bounce doesn’t mean the bull market is back.

In terms of 2007 comparisons, yesterday was likely our December 11th — pretty clear cut.  But, on the 12th, SPX put in a rickshaw man, basically a doji with very long tails and a tiny body in the middle — indicating indecision.  http://thepatternsite.com/RickshawMan.html   The market opened up 10 over the 11th’s 40 pt plunge, soared 25 points in 5 minutes to recover almost all the previous day’s losses.  But, it gave them up to close down 1 point.  Talk about driving investors crazy…

The next 4 sessions it dropped 42 points, to complete a 6-day 90 pt drop from the top.  It was followed by a 5-day, 64 pt retracement that took prices to their final pattern high of 1499.  This move was incorrectly assumed by some to be the start of [iii] of 5 up.  Nine days later, the market was down to 1376, testing the previous lows.  It bounced a bit there, but hit 1270 9 days later. 

2007 TOP

ORIGINAL POST:  6:27 AM PDT 

In overnight action, the futures declined to touch the -1 std dev line in our regression channel.  This was exactly what I expected from the cash market when I wrote last night’s update — just didn’t think it would happen that fast.

REGRESSION CHANNEL ON /ES

 We’ll keep an eye on the cash market opening to see if there’s a follow-through, or if all the fun happened overnight.  If we do get a bump up, I expect it to be the last best opportunity to add more short positions.

In Harry Potter, these are the three magical objects which make their owner a master of death.

Tonight, we’ll look at three technical indicators that, while they may not grant immortality, will hopefully guide us safely through a dangerous market.

(1)  Our harmonics patterns are working out exactly as expected.  As we forecast in Patterns, Patterns and More Patterns back on June 27, SPX went on to form an extremely well-formed Bat Pattern (the big W in orange in the chart above.)  The downside targets are devised by applying Fibonacci ratios against the DA measurement. In this case, that translates to:

(2)  The regression channel has done an amazing job of defining almost all of the tops in this pattern.  Look at the number of times one of the parallel red lines served as a limiting factor on either an advance or decline.

As the chart shows, the +1 standard deviation line limited advances on no less than 17 trading days since Feb 22.  The midline was even more effective, defining tops or bottoms on about 20 trading days.  The -1 and -2 lines defined about 19, and the +2 line marked the 1370 high.

Now that we’ve dropped beneath the midline, I think there’s a good possibility the -1 channel line will mark our next bounce.  At 1299, it captures all of the Head and Shoulders downside (target is 1310) we anticipated in this past weekend’s update.  And, the -2 channel line will ultimately mark our fall from this topping pattern.

(3)  The Fan Lines have been phenomenal at guiding the action on both the upside and downside.  Combined with downward sloping channels, they allowed me to accurately forecast the highs on 2/18, 4/6, 5/2, 5/31, 7/6 and within 12 points of our latest top.  More important, they gave me the conviction to initiate or hold positions when there was tempting evidence to the contrary.

Going forward, I expect the fan lines from Aug 31 to play an important role in determining turning points and bounces on the way down.  If the regression channel midline doesn’t catch the next bounce, I expect the fan line through the Jun 15 bottom will do it.  The downward-sloping channels drawn in the above chart will also consolidate our declines into predictable patterns.

NEXT:  As we talked about last Friday, the 87-day pattern I uncovered back in May [Sure, It Works in Practice] seems to play out on an accelerated basis in market tops.  It happened in 2007, which is my model for this topping pattern, and it’s happening so far this time. Here’s my original chart from May 9.

The pattern has been remarkably effective at marking interim highs.  On average, every 87 days the market declined by an average of about 4% within 3 trading days and 11% within 30 trading days.

On 12/26/07,  a 15% drop came along after 76 days.  But, here I fudged a little.  In reality, the decline started 10 days earlier on 12/11/07.  The market dipped 88 points in 5 days, and recovered 63 of them by the 26th.

I initially thought to use the 26th as the starting point because: (1) the decline really picked up steam then, and (2) it was closer to 87 days.  If I had used the 11th, it would have been only 61 days since the previous peak.  Interestingly, the next peak came only 63 days after the 26th.  I wondered, at the time, if the cycle duration “compressed” at market tops for some reason.

In retrospect, it seems obvious that the final interim high of a topping pattern should arrive after a shorter interval.  After all, the reason it’s only an interim high is because it fails to go on and become a new pattern high.  BTW, with this latest addition to the study, the cycle average has fallen from 87 to 86 days (I need a new name for it.)  A decline that unfolds per the averages from here would reach 1290 by Wednesday and 1194 by August 18th. 

Last, the huge H&S; pattern that’s been playing out since the start of the year indicates a downside of 1150.  These targets coincide nicely with those suggested by my other indicators.

Good luck to all.

ORIGINAL POST:  8:35AM PDT

Watching the bearish Bat Pattern unfold, with Fib targets based on the DA measurement:

.618   — 1295
1.272 — 1231
1.618 — 1197

Bearish Bat Pattern

And, for those who have been following my 2011 = 2007 posts, today is putting in a bid as a candidate for December 11, 2007.  Here’s how that day unfolded on an hourly basis:

Despite SPX losing about 40 points that day, it wasn’t straight down.  For a read on the market’s vibe before, during and after the fall, check out yesterday’s post She’s Come Undone.

Very instructive to see what reactions were like back then, particularly the disbelief.

While backtesting the trend line from the Mar ’09 lows, the market did a little throw-over last week — exceeding the resistance by 14 points on Thursday, but giving it all back on Friday.  As we discussed in Confidence Fairies and Snowballs, this throw-over was a function of the government’s attempt to intervene in the oil markets.

While doing little to contain energy prices, the move threw a monkey wrench into the bulls advance, meaning the market went father and faster than it otherwise would have.

A quick look at the big picture, showing the trend line going back three years to the Mar ’09 lows.  

A close-up of the daily graph shows the relation of the trend line to the fib levels and the regression channel that stopped the most recent advance (and four others before it.)

While it’s entirely possible that the market is gathering momentum for another move higher, I don’t believe we’ll exceep May’s high of 1370.  A quick look at the 60-minute version of the above chart illustrates where we are relative to resistance.

As mentioned above, there was a throw-over on Thursday.  As shown above, the advance was stopped dead in its tracks by the one-standard deviation line of the regression channel that’s defined this top.  Friday we quickly and forcefully reversed back below that line.  Friday’s slide ultimately lost steam, but the move back up was halted by the above-mentioned trend line. 

Where to from here?  The market has a lot of momentum going, for sure.  But, the resistance shouldn’t be underestimated.  It includes:

(1)  the trend-line from Mar ’09
(2)  the regression channel
(3)  the rising wedge
(4)  a very extended bearish Crab Pattern off the 1258 lows
(5)  a perfectly formed bearish Bat Pattern since the 1370 high
(6)  the 88.6% Fibonacci level off the May 2 highs
(7)  the 87-day pattern coming up.

If we can eek out another 10 points to the downside, we will have completed a little head and shoulders pattern that should take us back to 1310.   That’s a decline of 33 points from Friday’s close.  It should be enough to kick start the next wave down.  If we complete the H&S; pattern setting up since the first of the year, we’re going much lower.

I’ve also been studying breadth, looking for comparisons to the 2007 top that, so far, is serving as a blueprint for this market.  Take a look at the following chart.

Focus on the bottom study, the McClellan Oscillator — derived from the 19 and 39-day exponential moving averages of the daily difference between Advances and Declines.  At its current level of 275, it’s an indication of a strong upside move or, more likely, a very overbought condition.

As the graph shows, this is a relatively high reading.  In 2007, the oscillator spiked up to 233 on the final high of that topping pattern.  This spike followed a long and then a short downward-sloping, divergent move from previous highs.  The same pattern has developed in today’s market.

It got me to thinking about expectations.  What were we all thinking on December 10, 2007; and, how does that compare to today?  I’ve assembled a handful of links for market commentary from a few days before until a few days after that important day.

The market had made a strong move up, and bulls were out in force — even in the face of increasingly disturbing economic news.  But, a key Fed discount rate announcement was expected on the 11th.   The market hoped for a .50% rate cut, but got .25% instead.  The DJIA shed 300 points, and the SPX nearly 40. 

Obviously, we have issues that loom at least as large as 2007’s right here in 2011.  Instead of a rate cut, we’re waiting on news of a deficit ceiling increase — so we can borrow trillions more to keep the economy afloat.  Instead of  WAMU, we’re worried about Greece, Ireland, Portugal and maybe even Italy failing.

I could go on, but I encourage you to take the time to skim through them yourself, paying particular attention to expectations and sentiment.  It’s very instructive reading. 

Oh, and for any Guess Who fans who are salivating over title of this post, enjoy:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_gxQt-bhik

December 8, 2007:
http://www.safehaven.com/article/9013/market-update-the-remedy-to-sideways-markets
http://caldaro.wordpress.com/2007/12/08/weekend-update-146/

December 9, 2007:
http://caldaro.wordpress.com/2007/12/10/monday-update-136/
http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/12/a_curious_marke.html

December 10, 2007:

http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc071210.htm
http://prudentstockinvestor.blogspot.com/2007/12/daily-market-recap.html
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Rivq0pyH2pwJ:www.credit-suisse.com/news/en/media_release.jsp%3Fns%3D40604+%22stock+market%22+%22december+10,+2007%22&cd;=19&hl;=en&ct;=clnk≷=us&client;=firefox-a&source;=www.google.com
http://caldaro.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/tuesday-morning/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address;=102×3097484
http://online.barrons.com/article/SB119707193637917765.html

December 11, 2007:

http://www.wavechart.com/2007update.htm
http://caldaro.wordpress.com/2007/12/11/tuesday-update-145/
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:dKBNFc7M4QYJ:oldprof.typepad.com/a_dash_of_insight/2007/12/alice-rivlin-on.html+stock+market+update&cd;=80&hl;=en&ct;=clnk≷=us&client;=firefox-a&source;=www.google.com
http://www.actionforex.com/archives/action-insight-archives/daily-report:-carry-trades-gain-ahead-of-fed-rate-cut-2007121133276/

December 12, 2007:

http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2007/12/a_curious_marke.html
http://caldaro.wordpress.com/2007/12/12/wednesday-update-147/
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address;=102×3099056

December 13+:

http://afterhourtrades.com/aht.htms
http://www.investmentpostcards.com/2007/12/16/words-from-the-wise-for-the-week-that-was-dec-10-%E2%80%93-16-2007/

For anyone who’s wondering what ever happened to the 87-day cycle, it’s back.  Recall that we found that many of the significant downturns since 2007 fell within 15 days of an 87 calendar day cycle [see: Sure, it Works in Practice from May 10.]  Here’s the chart and graph from that post:

The average drop was 4.16% within 3 trade days, and 11.27% within 30 trade days.  The actual average interval was 87.3 days, with a standard deviation of 11.4.

I never came up with a logical reason for the cycle to work as it has.  The best idea I’ve had is that 87.3 is about three times the lunar cycle of 29.5 days (3 * 29.5 = 88.5 days.)  I’ve always been dubious of planetary influences in markets, but many swear by them.  Who am I to argue?

Besides, the only other statistic I can find that fits 29.1 days exactly (87.3 / 3 = 29.1) is the average number of days in a woman’s menstrual cycle.  Don’t want to go there.

As always, I’ve saved the best for last.  The only “failure” I could find in the pattern was on 12/26/07, when a 15% drop came along after 76 days.  But, here I fudged a little.  In reality, the decline started 10 days earlier on 12/11/07.  The market dipped 88 points in 5 days, and recovered 63 of them by the 26th.

I initially thought to use the 26th as the starting point because: (1) the decline really picked up steam then, and (2) it was closer to 87 days.  If I had used the 11th, it would have been only 61 days since the previous peak.  Interestingly, the next peak came only 63 days after the 26th.  I wondered, at the time, if the cycle duration “compressed” at market tops for some reason.

This may be one of those nonsensical statistical oddities that works for a while, then never does again.  But, the recent May 2 top, which came 73 days after the Feb 18 top, was 67 days ago.  If the cycle does compress at tops, we could expect a peak any time, now.  And, what better time than after a moon shot like we’ve had the past two weeks?

I’ve made no secret of my conviction that this is a topping pattern that’s just about run its course. I believe today’s high of 1356.87 is as high as we’re going to go.  If so, and just doing the math, here… an average 4.16% 3-day drop from today’s close would take us to 1297.  An average 11.27% 30-day drop would mean 1200. 

Happy trading!

Anyone considering jumping on the bullish bandwagon should look carefully at the charts below.

I’ve drawn in 2-standard deviation regression channels.  You might notice that the only key difference between the 2007 and the 2011 charts is that in 2007, the final push rises to the midline, or zero channel.  At today’s top, and I think is is one, we’re right at the +1 channel.  Both are emphasized in yellow dotted lines.

Together:

The 2007 top:

The 2011 top:

One other note:

Anyone who slogged through those early posts (here, here and here), where I played around with different means of identifying these topping patterns, knows that I vacillated between regression channels and fan lines.  In the end, I went with the fan lines.

I didn’t discuss it at the time, but I was always bothered by the way the 2011’s top didn’t rotate over to properly match the slope of the obvious fan lines.  The +/- 2-standard deviation channels didn’t line up with the pattern highs and lows.  I wondered if the channel would achieve the proper slope once the pattern was a little more mature.

Today, the channel lines line up perfectly with the fan lines we’ve drawn.  The highs/lows are right at the 2-std. dev. boundaries, and the slope is very, very close to that of the 2007 and the 2001 tops.

BTW, here’s the 2001 top, for comparison purposes.  We came up 30 points shy of the mid-line.  Today, we exceeded it by 30 points.  Funny how that works.

I think we decline dramatically from here.  Between the rising wedge, the divergences, the unimpeded climb on low volume, the Crab pattern, and the Head and Shoulders pattern [details at Confidence Fairies and Snowballs] and this final piece of the similarity puzzle, it’s time to put a fork in this market.

In a Q&A; session with Reuters this morning Mohamed El-Erian remarked that:

The confidence fairy has to counter the reality of an economy that still has to de-lever, structural headwinds, concerns about Europe, etc…

The current approach of kicking the can down the road (I prefer rolling a snowball down a hill as it captures the growing size of the problem and its accelerating nature) will not last for much longer in my opinion.

Well, apparently investors everywhere are clapping their hands and shouting “I believe!”  Because the confidence fairy is rising from the palms of Bernanke’s hands, spreading her wings and granting their every wish. 

I was asked last night if the IHS pattern with potential to 1351 would outweigh the Crab Pattern that pointed to below 1300.  I thought no, since it is much smaller.  Yet, here we are at 1355; and, I have serious egg on my face.

So, where from here?  While this rise certainly inspires confidence, it takes us further into a rising wedge that I haven’t talked about much before.  It was lacking in upper TL touches, leaving a lot of white space on the left/upper side.  Although a big fan of reversals dealt by rising wedges, I try to stick to well-formed patterns.

This one is better formed now.  And, judging from both the hourly (above) and the daily (below) charts, it has just about played out.  There are perhaps two more days left before the pattern reaches its apex at — that’s right — 1370.

Will we get there?  No, I don’t think so.  From a fundamental standpoint, I believe all the “good news” is pretty much out there; and, I’m a fervent believer in buy the rumor, sell the news.  Further, the news we supposedly rallied on today is the same old crapola we’ve been fed for months, now:  falsified employment numbers (that’ll be revised next week) and impending “deals” that will make both our and Europe’s problems magically disappear.

We’re also nudging up against the next obvious turning point for this rally — the 88.6% Fib retrace of the 1370 highs at 1357.75.  And, the divergences in SPX are becoming glaring, as can be seen on the hourly chart above.  Put it all together, and it seems to me the rubber band has simply been stretched a lot tighter.  When we snap back, it’ll be bigger, faster and bloodier than would otherwise have been the case.

In my opinion the confidence fairy has a Sisyphian task on her hands.  ECB’s Trichet wants to play let’s pretend.  Let’s pretend that Portugal is okay — because they’re trying really, really hard.  Let’s pretend that Ireland and Greece will be able to someday repay the billions we’ve lent them.  Let’s pretend that Spain and Italy won’t catch the others’ cold.

Juncker says the answer is to create an in-house rating agency, so Euro-zone countries don’t have to suffer from the “irrational” actions of those mean US-based agencies.  Luc Coene chimed in, adding that the downgrades (not the credits, mind you) “are bad.”  Kind of like blaming the sword instead of the pirate using it to force you to walk the plank.

More after the close.

In the meantime, a couple voices of reason (barely audible over the clapping).  From the Fed’s Thomas Hoenig:

Hoenig — who is set to retire October 1 — maintained his argument that monetary policy is not a tool that can solve every problem.  In fact, he said he is concerned that “in working to offset the effects of this devastating crisis and to restore the economy to health, an extended zero-interest-rate policy is producing new sources of fragility that we need to be aware of and allow for in our future policy choices.


“Having seen the effects of financial crisis after financial crisis as short-term policies beget short-term policies, we should know that an ever-present short-run focus, even if well intentioned, is the road to ruin,” he said.


Hoenig warned that the longer the Fed leaves its zero interest policy in place, the more assets will be defined by these low rates and the greater the negative impact will be once rates, inevitably, begin to rise once more.  With interest rates near zero and additional massive liquidity poured into the economy, all interest rates are affected, he said. This has had a knock-on effect on asset values of every kind are also being affected, artificially boost their value. “When — not if –the adjustment occurs, we will see a dramatic drop in values.”

And, more from El-Erian:

The Euro-zone is truly a multi speed economy. Countries such as Greece are struggling mightily due to excessive debt and an inability to grow; and the current policy approach does little to deal with these issues. And who would have thought that a Euro-zone country would have a rating (CCC) that is worse that a country such as Pakistan.  


Portugal and Ireland face similar issues, though the magnitudes are different. These two peripheral countries are already in the Euro-zone’s financial ICU, having both had to resort to bailout packages. And just this week, a rating agency downgraded Portugal to junk status. Again, this was unthinkable just a year ago.

At the other extreme, Germany is doing well. In fact, it has surprised many. It is reaping the benefits of years of economic restructuring and sound liability management. Yet its well being risks being negatively impacted by repeated demands to bail out weaker members of the Euro-zone.  


The question for the Euro-zone is how to reconcile these multiple realities; how to deal with multi speeds in growth and balance sheet dynamics. And it is a question that assumes added urgency given that the political decision to address the peripheral economies’ solvency problem using a liquidity approach has contaminated other important parts of the Euro-zone – most importantly the balance sheet of the European Central Bank. Thus, the concern you cite Brian about the integrity of the Euro-zone, including the robustness of the Euro.

The current approach of kicking the can down the road (I prefer rolling a snowball down a hill as it captures the growing size of the problem and its accelerating nature) will not last for much longer in my opinion.


If it wishes to avoid a really disorderly outcome, Europe will be forced to opt for one of two corner solutions: fiscal union, or debt restructuring and, possibly, a Euro-zone sabbatical for at least one (and possibly up to three) of the 17 members of the Euro-zone.  The more Europe delays this choice — and it is a difficult one — the greater the risk that policy makers may lose control of the situation.

According to the Washington Post, Obama has thrown the sick and the elderly under the balance-the-frickin-budget bus.  At least, that’s how some will paint it.  Others will assert that Boehner has abandoned his peeps (the rich) in order to reach an unacceptable compromise.

As always, reality is somewhere in the middle (and it’s far from a done deal.)  We certainly must reduce our skyrocketing debt — especially before interest rates increase and it takes 482% of GDP to make interest payments alone.  But, we also need to increase our revenues — easier said than done in the midst of a Recession/Depression.

I don’t know what to expect of the markets tomorrow.  Futures are uniformly positive at the moment, with equities, gold and oil all positive (SPX is up 6.75 at 1342.50)  The USD is off a little, but is still trending up.  So, this is good news, right? 

My initial reaction is “so what?”  I mean, was there any doubt that some sort of accommodation would be reached?  If you buy that, then the question is “how does this accommodation compare to expectations?”  Most of us expected that each side would give some ground in order to reach a deal.  From what I’ve read, this agreement looks fairly neutral; i.e., it should piss off both sides pretty well.

Bottom line, I don’t see it having much of an impact.  The real question is “will the deal, if it is in fact reached, make enough of a difference to prevent a financial meltdown?”  The market’s recent rise has occurred in spite of obvious long-term and structural problems with our economy: our competitive disadvantages (labor costs, currency, etc.), corrupt, incompetent and ineffective financial oversight, politicians whose sole aim is serving their donors/masters, a tax system that encourages multinationals to stiff the IRS, and massive levels of unsecured debt.

These problems won’t be fixed by Obama and Boehner becoming golf buddies.  In my opinion, the only real solution to our problems is a massive marking to market of debt and equity in all markets across the board.  Debt investors will have to recognize the losses they’ve already sustained.  Equity investors will suffer even worse.  But, again, when valuations are contingent on the Fed’s continued willingness to pump hundreds of billions into worthless instruments, the losses are already there.  They just haven’t been booked, yet.

Our trading partners will kick and scream, but they won’t have a choice.  They’ll simply be booking the losses they’ve already sustained.  And, where else would they go to sell their stuff?  The dollar will get sketchy for a while but, again, what are the alternatives?  The Euro is dead currency walking, and China has its own problems. 

We’ve pumped trillions into preventing a depression.  It didn’t work.  It won’t work.  Only when the debt goes away can we get back to a sustainable growth model that doesn’t rely on financial trickery.  When/if that happens, I’ll turn bullish.  Until then, not only is this announcement isn’t really “good news.”  It’s not even news.